EX-99.1 3 d621793dex991.htm EX-99.1 EX-99.1
Table of Contents

Exhibit 99.1

Preliminary and Subject to Completion, dated May 8, 2014

 

LOGO

                    , 2014

Dear Ensign Stockholder:

We are pleased to inform you that the board of directors of The Ensign Group, Inc. (“Ensign”) has approved a plan to separate its healthcare business and its real estate business into two separate and independent publicly traded companies:

 

    Ensign, which will continue to provide healthcare services through its existing operations; and

 

    CareTrust REIT, Inc. (“CareTrust”), which will own, acquire and lease real estate serving the healthcare industry.

Ensign will accomplish the separation by distributing all of the outstanding shares of CareTrust common stock to Ensign stockholders on a pro rata basis (the “Spin-Off”). At the time of the Spin-Off, CareTrust, which is currently a wholly owned subsidiary of Ensign, will hold substantially all of the real property owned by Ensign, and will operate three independent living facilities. After the Spin-Off, all of these properties (other than the three independent living facilities that CareTrust will operate) will be leased to Ensign on a triple-net basis, under which Ensign will be responsible for all costs at the properties, including property taxes, insurance and maintenance and repair costs. CareTrust intends to elect to be taxed and intends to qualify as a real estate investment trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencing with its taxable year ending December 31, 2014.

You will receive one share of CareTrust common stock for every share of Ensign common stock that you held at the close of business on                     , 2014, the record date for the Spin-Off. Following the Spin-Off, you will own shares in both Ensign and CareTrust. The number of Ensign shares you own will not change as a result of the Spin-Off. CareTrust has applied to list its common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol “CTRE.” Ensign common stock will continue to be listed and traded on NASDAQ under the symbol “ENSG.”

No vote of Ensign stockholders is required in connection with the Spin-Off. You do not need to make any payment, surrender or exchange your shares of Ensign common stock or take any other action to receive your shares of CareTrust common stock.

The enclosed information statement, which is being made available to all Ensign stockholders, describes the Spin-Off in detail and contains important information about CareTrust and its business. We urge you to read the information statement carefully and in its entirety.

We want to thank you for your continued support for Ensign, and we look forward to your support for CareTrust in the future.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

 

Christopher R. Christensen

Chief Executive Officer


Table of Contents

 

LOGO

                    , 2014

Dear Future Stockholder of CareTrust REIT, Inc.:

It is our pleasure to welcome you as a stockholder of our company, CareTrust REIT, Inc. (“CareTrust”). Following the distribution of all of the outstanding shares of CareTrust common stock by The Ensign Group, Inc. (“Ensign”) to its stockholders, CareTrust will be a newly listed, publicly traded company that will own, acquire and lease real estate serving the healthcare industry, and will own and operate independent living facilities.

Our initial portfolio will consist of substantially all of the skilled nursing, assisted living and independent living facilities owned by Ensign. All of these properties will be leased to Ensign on a triple-net basis, except for three independent living facilities that we will operate. We expect to diversify our tenant base in the future by acquiring additional properties and leasing them to other local, regional and national healthcare providers. We also expect to grow and diversify our portfolio through the acquisition of properties in different geographic markets, and in different asset classes.

We invite you to learn more about CareTrust and its business by reviewing the enclosed information statement. We urge you to read the information statement carefully and in its entirety. We are excited by our future prospects, and look forward to your support as a holder of our common stock.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

Gregory K. Stapley

President and Chief Executive Officer


Table of Contents

Information contained herein is subject to completion or amendment. A registration statement on Form 10 relating to these securities has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Preliminary and Subject to Completion, dated May 8, 2014

INFORMATION STATEMENT

CareTrust REIT, Inc.

Common Stock

(Par Value $0.01 Per Share)

 

 

This information statement is being furnished in connection with the pro rata distribution (the “Spin-Off”) by The Ensign Group, Inc. (“Ensign”) to its stockholders of all of the outstanding shares of common stock of CareTrust REIT, Inc. (“CareTrust”), which is currently a wholly owned subsidiary of Ensign. At the time of the Spin-Off, CareTrust will hold substantially all of the real property currently owned by Ensign. On a pro forma basis as of March 31, 2014, CareTrust’s initial portfolio consists of 97 skilled nursing, assisted living and independent living facilities. After the Spin-Off, all of these properties will be leased to Ensign on a triple-net basis, except for three independent living facilities that CareTrust will operate. The Spin-Off is intended to be tax-free to Ensign stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes, except for cash paid in lieu of fractional shares.

For every share of common stock of Ensign held of record by you as of the close of business on                     , 2014 (the “record date”), you will receive one share of CareTrust common stock. You will receive cash in lieu of any fractional shares of CareTrust common stock which you would have otherwise received. The date on which the shares of CareTrust common stock will be distributed to you (the “distribution date”) is expected to be                     , 2014. After the Spin-Off is completed, CareTrust will be a separate and independent publicly traded company.

No vote of Ensign’s stockholders is required in connection with the Spin-Off. Therefore, you are not being asked for a proxy, and you are requested not to send us a proxy. You will not be required to make any payment, surrender or exchange your shares of Ensign common stock or take any other action to receive your shares of CareTrust common stock.

Ensign currently owns all of the outstanding shares of CareTrust common stock, so there is no current trading market for CareTrust common stock. We anticipate that a limited market, commonly known as a “when-issued” trading market, will develop shortly before the record date, and that “regular-way” trading in shares of CareTrust common stock will begin on the first trading day following the distribution date. If trading begins on a “when-issued” basis, you may purchase or sell CareTrust common stock up to and including the distribution date, but your transaction will not settle until after the distribution date. CareTrust has applied to list its common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol “CTRE.” As discussed under “The Spin-Off—Listing and Trading of Our Shares,” if you sell your Ensign common stock in the “due-bills” market before the distribution date, you also will be selling your right to receive shares of CareTrust common stock in connection with the Spin-Off. However, if you sell your Ensign common stock in the “ex-distribution” market before the distribution date, you will still receive shares of CareTrust common stock in the Spin-Off.

CareTrust intends to elect to be taxed and intends to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencing with its taxable year ending December 31, 2014. To assist CareTrust in qualifying as a REIT, among other purposes, CareTrust’s charter will contain certain restrictions relating to the ownership and transfer of its stock, including a provision generally restricting a stockholder from owning more than 9.8% in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of CareTrust common stock, or more than 9.8% in value of the outstanding shares of all classes or series of CareTrust stock, without the prior consent of CareTrust’s board of directors. See “Description of Our Capital Stock—Restrictions on Transfer and Ownership of CareTrust Stock.”

Following the Spin-Off, CareTrust will be an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), and, as such, is allowed to provide in this information statement more limited disclosures than an issuer that would not so qualify. In addition, for so long as we remain an emerging growth company, we may also take advantage of certain limited exceptions from investor protection laws such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), and the Investor Protection and Securities Reform Act of 2010, for limited periods. See “Summary—Emerging Growth Company Status.”

In reviewing this information statement, you should carefully consider the matters described under the caption “Risk Factors” beginning on page 18.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved these securities or determined if this information statement is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

This information statement does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities.

Ensign first mailed this information statement to its stockholders on or about                 , 2014.

 

 

The date of this information statement is                     , 2014.


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

     Page  

SUMMARY

     1   

RISK FACTORS

     18   

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

     41   

THE SPIN-OFF

     42   

DIVIDEND POLICY

     51   

FINANCING

     53   

CAPITALIZATION

     55   

CARETRUST’S UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     56   

ENSIGN’S UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     62   

SELECTED COMBINED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA

     68   

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     70   

BUSINESS

     85   

MANAGEMENT

     96   

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

     107   

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

     109   

OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH ENSIGN FOLLOWING THE SPIN-OFF

     110   

DESCRIPTION OF OUR CAPITAL STOCK

     118   

U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS

     128   

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

     148   

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     F-1   

 

i


Table of Contents

SUMMARY

The following is a summary of material information included in this information statement. This summary may not contain all of the details concerning the Spin-Off or other information that may be important to you. To better understand the Spin-Off and CareTrust’s business, you should carefully review this entire information statement.

Unless the context otherwise requires, any references in this information statement to “CareTrust” “we,” “our,” “us” and the “Company” refer to CareTrust REIT, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. References in this information statement to “Ensign” generally refer to The Ensign Group, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries (other than CareTrust REIT, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries after the Spin-Off), unless the context requires otherwise. The Ensign Group, Inc. is a holding company with no direct operating assets, employees or revenues. All of its operations are conducted by separate, wholly owned, independent subsidiaries that have their own management, employees and assets.

This information statement has been prepared on a prospective basis on the assumption that, among other things, the Spin-Off and the related transactions contemplated to occur prior to or contemporaneously with the Spin-Off will be consummated as contemplated by this information statement. There can be no assurance, however, that any or all of such transactions will occur or will occur as so contemplated.

You should not assume that the information contained in this information statement is accurate as of any date other than the date set forth on the cover. Changes to the information contained in this information statement may occur after that date, and we undertake no obligation to update the information, except in the normal course of our public disclosure obligations. In particular, a number of matters contained in this information statement relate to agreements or arrangements that have not yet been finalized and expectations of what may occur. It is possible that prior to the Spin-Off, these agreements, arrangements and expectations may change.

Our Company

At the time of the Spin-Off, CareTrust will hold substantially all of the real property currently owned by Ensign. On a pro forma basis as of March 31, 2014, CareTrust’s initial portfolio consists of 97 skilled nursing, assisted living and independent living facilities (the “CareTrust Properties”). After the Spin-Off, all of these properties will be leased to Ensign on a triple-net basis, except for three independent living facilities that CareTrust will operate. On a pro forma basis as of March 31, 2014, the 94 facilities leased to Ensign have a total of 10,121 operational beds and units and are located in Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Nebraska, Nevada, Texas, Utah and Washington, and the three independent living facilities operated by CareTrust have a total of 264 units and are located in Texas and Utah. See “Our Relationship with Ensign Following the Spin-Off—Master Leases.”

Following the Spin-Off, CareTrust will be a separate and independent publicly traded, self-administered, self-managed REIT primarily engaged in the ownership, acquisition and leasing of healthcare-related properties. We expect to generate revenues primarily by leasing healthcare facilities to healthcare operators in triple-net lease arrangements, under which the tenant is solely responsible for the costs related to the property (including property taxes, insurance, and maintenance and repair costs). We intend to conduct and manage our business as one operating segment for internal reporting and internal decision making purposes. We expect to grow our portfolio by pursuing opportunities to acquire additional properties that will be leased to a diverse group of local, regional and national healthcare providers, which may include Ensign, as well as senior housing operators and related businesses. We also anticipate diversifying our portfolio over time, including by acquiring properties in different geographic markets, and in different asset classes.

 


Table of Contents

Approximately 42 current employees of Ensign are expected to be employed by CareTrust immediately following the Spin-Off. The majority of these employees will be employed in connection with our operation of three independent living facilities.

To maintain REIT status, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we annually distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains. See “U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.”

Overview of the Spin-Off

The board of directors of Ensign has announced a plan to separate its healthcare business and its real estate business into two separate and independent publicly traded companies:

 

    Ensign, which will continue to provide healthcare services through its existing operations; and

 

    CareTrust, which will own, acquire and lease real estate serving the healthcare industry.

Ensign will accomplish the separation by contributing to CareTrust the entities that own the CareTrust Properties and the entities that operate three independent living facilities, and then distributing all of the outstanding shares of CareTrust common stock to Ensign’s stockholders. Prior to the Spin-Off, CareTrust and Ensign will enter into multiple long-term leases (each, a “Master Lease” and, collectively, the “Master Leases”), under which Ensign will lease CareTrust’s initial portfolio of healthcare facilities on a triple-net basis. Ensign and CareTrust will also enter into a number of other agreements to govern the relationship between them following the Spin-Off. See “Our Relationship with Ensign Following the Spin-Off.”

Ensign will effect the Spin-Off by distributing to Ensign’s stockholders one share of CareTrust common stock for each share of Ensign common stock that they held at the close of business on                     , 2014, the record date for the Spin-Off. Ensign’s stockholders will receive cash in lieu of any fractional shares of CareTrust common stock which they would have otherwise received. We expect the shares of CareTrust common stock to be distributed by Ensign on                     , 2014.

In order to comply with certain REIT qualification requirements, CareTrust will declare and distribute a special dividend to its stockholders equal to the amount of accumulated earnings and profits, or “E&P,” allocated to CareTrust in the Spin-Off. We refer to this special dividend as the “Purging Distribution” because it is intended to purge the company of earnings and profits attributable to the period prior to CareTrust’s first taxable year as a REIT. The amount of accumulated earnings and profits allocated to CareTrust in the Spin-Off will be based on applicable tax principles and will not correspond to retained earnings in historical financial statements because of differences between tax and book income and expenses. Ensign will allocate its accumulated earnings and profits for periods prior to the Spin-Off between Ensign and CareTrust in a manner that, in its best judgment, is in accordance with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). We expect to make the Purging Distribution by December 31, 2014. The total amount of Ensign’s E&P immediately prior to the Spin-Off is expected to be between $350.0 million and $385.0 million. The actual amount of Ensign’s E&P allocated to CareTrust will depend on the final determination of Ensign’s E&P and the relative trading value of CareTrust common stock and Ensign common stock following the Spin-Off. The Purging Distribution will be paid to CareTrust stockholders in a combination of cash and shares of CareTrust common stock with an aggregate value equal to Ensign’s E&P allocated to CareTrust. The portion that will be paid in cash will be determined by CareTrust at the time the dividend is declared, but will be at least 20% and not more than 25% of the total amount paid to all stockholders. See “The Spin-Off—The Purging Distribution” and “U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Taxation of REITs in General—Annual Distribution Requirements—Earnings and Profits Distribution Requirements.”

The Spin-Off is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of a number of conditions. See “The Spin-Off—Conditions to the Spin-Off.” In addition, Ensign’s board of directors has reserved the right, in its sole discretion, to amend, modify or abandon the Spin-Off or any related transaction at any time prior to the distribution date.

 

 

2


Table of Contents

Reasons for the Spin-Off

The strategic considerations and nature of Ensign’s healthcare business currently dictate and limit the size and scope of its real estate business. After the Spin-Off, CareTrust will be able to make decisions regarding the real estate business without regard to the Ensign healthcare business. As a result, CareTrust intends to expand into new geographic areas, acquire properties in different asset classes, diversify its tenant base and reduce its financing costs. At the same time, Ensign expects to realize benefits from being a “pure play” healthcare operator and intends to continue to pursue its historical growth practices and strategies. As such, management, regulators, market analysts and investors will be able to focus solely on Ensign’s healthcare operations.

Our Relationship with Ensign

After the Spin-Off, CareTrust will be a separate and independent publicly traded, self-administered and self-managed REIT. Ensign will be a separate and independent publicly traded company and, through its consolidated operating subsidiaries, will continue to provide healthcare services through its existing operations. It will retain ownership of a facility located in California where significant future real estate development activities are planned, and is expected to retain any additional properties it acquires before the Spin-Off. Ensign will also continue to operate the properties that it leases from parties other than CareTrust.

As of March 31, 2014, Ensign operated 120 facilities, nine home health and seven hospice operations, nine urgent care centers and a mobile x-ray and diagnostic company located in 11 western states. Prior to the Spin-Off, Ensign will separate the healthcare operations from the independent living operations at two locations, resulting in a total of 122 facilities. Giving pro forma effect to this separation and the Spin-Off, as of March 31, 2014, Ensign will operate 94 facilities under the Master Leases, and 23 facilities under long-term lease arrangements with other parties, and will retain one entity that holds a single property located in California.

To govern their relationship after the Spin-Off, Ensign and CareTrust will enter into, among others: (1) a separation and distribution agreement setting forth the mechanics of the Spin-Off, certain organizational matters and other ongoing obligations of Ensign and CareTrust (the “Separation and Distribution Agreement”), (2) the Master Leases, (3) an agreement pursuant to which Ensign and CareTrust will make certain business opportunities available to each other during the one-year period following the Spin-Off (the “Opportunities Agreement”), (4) an agreement relating to tax matters (the “Tax Matters Agreement”), (5) an agreement pursuant to which Ensign will provide certain administrative and support services to CareTrust on a transitional basis (the “Transition Services Agreement”), and (6) an agreement relating to employee matters (the “Employee Matters Agreement”). See “Our Relationship with Ensign Following the Spin-Off.”

Financing

We expect to put in place a capital structure that provides us with the flexibility to grow and a cost of debt capital that allows us to compete for investment opportunities. Our financing arrangements may include bank debt, bonds, a revolving credit facility and long-term mortgage financing. Prior to the Spin-Off, we anticipate that we will issue up to $260.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes. We also anticipate that we will enter into a credit agreement providing for a revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to $150.0 million to be provided by a syndicate of banks and other financial institutions. In connection with the Spin-Off, CareTrust will transfer to Ensign approximately $220.8 million of proceeds from the issuance of the notes in order for Ensign to repay certain indebtedness, pay trade payables and, subject to the approval of Ensign’s board of directors, pay up to eight regular quarterly dividends. The amount of proceeds to be transferred to Ensign was determined based on the desired capitalization of Ensign and CareTrust after the Spin-Off. It was not determined based on any appraisal or valuation of the CareTrust Properties. We will use a portion of the proceeds from the notes issuance to pay the cash portion of the Purging Distribution, which we expect to make by December 31, 2014. Prior to the Spin-Off, we also intend to obtain additional mortgage indebtedness of approximately $50.5 million. After the Spin-Off, the remaining proceeds from the notes issuance, the net proceeds from the additional mortgage indebtedness and borrowings under our revolving credit facility will be available for working capital purposes, to fund acquisitions and for general corporate purposes.

 

 

3


Table of Contents

The notes are expected to have terms customary for notes of this type, including customary restrictive covenants, redemption and repurchase provisions and events of default. The revolving credit facility is expected to contain customary affirmative and negative covenants, as well as customary events of default. We also anticipate that the revolving credit facility will require us to comply with specified financial maintenance covenants. We have not yet entered into any commitments with respect to our financing arrangements, and, accordingly, the terms of such financing arrangements have not yet been determined, remain under discussion and are subject to change, including as a result of market conditions. For additional information concerning this indebtedness, see “Financing.”

Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer of Our Common Stock

To assist us in complying with the limitations on the concentration of ownership of REIT stock imposed by the Code, among other purposes, our charter will provide for restrictions on ownership and transfer of our shares of stock, including, subject to certain exceptions, prohibitions on any person beneficially or constructively owning more than 9.8% in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of our common stock, or more than 9.8% in value of the outstanding shares of all classes or series of our stock. A person that did not acquire more than 9.8% of our outstanding stock may become subject to our charter restrictions if repurchases by us cause such person’s holdings to exceed 9.8% of our outstanding stock. Under certain circumstances, our board of directors may waive the ownership limits. Our charter will provide that shares of our capital stock acquired or held in excess of the ownership limit will be transferred to a trust for the benefit of a designated charitable beneficiary, and that any person who acquires shares of our capital stock in violation of the ownership limit will not be entitled to any dividends on the shares or be entitled to vote the shares or receive any proceeds from the subsequent sale of the shares in excess of the lesser of the price paid for the shares or the amount realized from the sale (net of any commissions and other expenses of sale). A transfer of shares of our capital stock in violation of the ownership limit may be void under certain circumstances. Our 9.8% ownership limitation may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets) that might provide a premium price for our stockholders. See “Description of Our Capital Stock—Restrictions on Transfer and Ownership of CareTrust Stock.”

Our Tax Status

We intend to elect to be taxed and intend to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ending December 31, 2014. Our qualification as a REIT will depend upon our ability to meet, on a continuing basis, various complex requirements under the Code relating to, among other things, the sources of our gross income, the composition and values of our assets, our distribution levels to our stockholders and the concentration of ownership of our capital stock. We believe that, commencing with our taxable year ending December 31, 2014, we will be organized in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Code, and that our intended manner of operation will enable us to meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT. In connection with the Spin-Off, we will receive an opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP to the effect that we have been organized in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Code, and that our proposed method of operation will enable us to meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT.

Emerging Growth Company Status

Following the Spin-Off, we will be an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act. For as long as we remain an emerging growth company, we may take advantage of certain limited exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies. These provisions include, but are not limited to:

 

    not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for up to five years;

 

 

4


Table of Contents
    reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports, proxy statements and registration statements; and

 

    exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.

We have elected to take advantage of some of these exemptions. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive if we decide to rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile and adversely affected.

In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), for complying with new or revised accounting standards applicable to public companies. In other words, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to take advantage of this extended transition period. As a result of this election, our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates for such new or revised standards. We may elect to comply with public company effective dates at any time, and such election would be irrevocable pursuant to Section 107(b) of the JOBS Act.

We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (1) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our total annual gross revenues exceed $1 billion, (2) the date on which we are deemed to be a “large accelerated filer,” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act or any successor statute, which would occur if the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, (3) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three-year period, and (4) the end of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the date of the first sale of our common stock pursuant to an effective registration statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).

Summary of Risks Associated with Our Business and the Spin-Off

The Spin-Off and the related transactions pose a number of risks, including:

 

    We may be unable to achieve some or all the benefits that we expect to achieve from the Spin-Off.

 

    If the Spin-Off were to fail to qualify as a tax-free transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes, Ensign, Ensign stockholders and CareTrust could be subject to significant tax liabilities and, in certain circumstances, we could be required to indemnify Ensign for material taxes pursuant to indemnification obligations under the Tax Matters Agreement that we will enter into with Ensign.

 

    Our agreements with Ensign may not reflect terms that would have resulted from arm’s-length negotiations with unaffiliated third parties.

 

    Ensign Properties’ combined historical financial data and our pro forma combined financial data included in this information statement do not purport to be indicative of the results we would have achieved as a separate and independent publicly traded company and may not be a reliable indicator of future results.

 

    The Spin-Off could give rise to disputes or other unfavorable effects, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial position or results of operations.

 

    We are currently subject to applicable requirements of Ensign’s 2013 Corporate Integrity Agreement with the Office of the Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and we will remain subject to such requirements following the Spin-Off.

 

 

5


Table of Contents
    If we do not qualify to be taxed as a REIT, or fail to remain qualified as a REIT, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax as a regular corporation and could face a substantial tax liability, which would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

 

    Complying with REIT requirements may cause us to forgo otherwise attractive acquisition opportunities or liquidate otherwise attractive investments.

 

    We will be dependent on Ensign to make payments to us under the Master Leases, and an event that materially and adversely affects Ensign’s business, financial position or results of operations could materially and adversely affect our business, financial position or results of operations.

 

    Our tenants depend on reimbursement from government and other third-party payors; reimbursement rates from such payors may be reduced, which could cause our tenants’ revenues to decline and could affect their ability to meet their obligations to us.

 

    Our level of indebtedness could materially and adversely affect our financial position, including reducing funds available for other business purposes and reducing our operational flexibility, and we may have future capital needs and may not be able to obtain additional financing on acceptable terms.

 

    Covenants in our debt agreements may limit our operational flexibility, and a covenant breach or default could materially and adversely affect our business, financial position or results of operations.

 

    The impact of healthcare reform legislation on us and our tenants cannot be accurately predicted.

These and other risks related to the Spin-Off and our business are discussed in greater detail under the heading “Risk Factors” in this information statement. You should read and consider all of these risks carefully.

Our Corporate Information

We were formed as a Maryland corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Ensign on October 29, 2013. Our principal executive offices are located at 27101 Puerta Real, Suite 400, Mission Viejo, CA 92691 and our telephone number is (949) 540-2000. We will own all of our properties, and conduct all of our operations, through our operating partnership, CTR Partnership, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”). We will maintain a website at www.CareTrustREIT.com.

 

 

6


Table of Contents

Questions and Answers about CareTrust and the Separation

 

What is CareTrust, and how will the separation of Ensign’s healthcare operating business and real estate business benefit the two companies and their stockholders?    CareTrust is currently a wholly owned subsidiary of Ensign. Prior to the Spin-Off, Ensign will transfer to CareTrust the entities that own the CareTrust Properties and the entities that operate three independent living facilities. The separation of CareTrust from Ensign and the distribution of CareTrust common stock are intended to provide you with equity investments in two separate companies, each able to focus on its particular business. Ensign will continue to provide healthcare services through its existing operations in substantially the same manner as it has done historically. CareTrust will own, acquire and lease real estate serving the healthcare industry, and will own and operate independent living facilities.
What are the reasons for the Spin-Off?    Strategic considerations and the nature of Ensign’s healthcare business currently dictate and limit the size and scope of its real estate business. After the Spin-Off, CareTrust will be able to make decisions regarding the real estate business without regard to the Ensign healthcare business. As a result, CareTrust intends to expand into new geographic areas, acquire properties in different asset classes, diversify its tenant base and reduce its financing costs. At the same time, Ensign expects to realize benefits from being a “pure play” healthcare operator and intends to continue to pursue its historical growth practices and strategies. As such, management, regulators, market analysts and investors will be able to focus solely on Ensign’s healthcare operations. See “The Spin-Off—Reasons for the Spin-Off.”
What will CareTrust’s initial portfolio consist of?   

At the time of the Spin-Off, CareTrust will hold substantially all of the real property currently owned by Ensign. On a pro forma basis as of March 31, 2014, CareTrust’s initial portfolio consists of 97 skilled nursing, assisted living and independent living facilities. After the Spin-Off, all of CareTrust’s initial portfolio will be leased to Ensign on a triple-net basis under the Master Leases, except for three independent living facilities that CareTrust will operate.

What properties will Ensign have after the Spin-Off?   

After the Spin-Off, Ensign’s operating subsidiaries will continue to provide healthcare services through their existing operations. On a pro forma basis as of March 31, 2014, Ensign’s portfolio consists of 94 facilities operated under the Master Leases with CareTrust and 23 facilities operated under long-term lease arrangements with other parties, and one property located in California where future real estate development activities are planned. Ensign also is expected to retain any additional properties it acquires before the Spin-Off.

Why is CareTrust referred to as a REIT, and what is a REIT?   

Following the Spin-Off, CareTrust intends to qualify and elect to be taxed as a real estate investment trust or “REIT” for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencing with its taxable year ending December 31, 2014.

 

A REIT is a company that derives most of its income from real property or real estate mortgages and has elected to be taxed as a REIT. If a corporation elects to be taxed and qualifies as a REIT, it will generally not be subject to U.S. federal corporate income taxes on income that it currently distributes to its stockholders. A company’s qualification as a REIT depends on its ability to meet, on

 

 

7


Table of Contents
   a continuing basis, various complex requirements under the Code relating to, among other things, the sources of its gross income, the composition and values of its assets, its distribution levels to its stockholders and the concentration of ownership of its capital stock.
Why is the separation of CareTrust structured as a distribution?    Ensign believes that a Spin-Off, or distribution, of CareTrust common stock to Ensign stockholders is an efficient way to separate CareTrust’s real estate business from Ensign’s healthcare business.
How will the separation of CareTrust work?    Ensign will distribute the shares of CareTrust common stock to the holders of Ensign common stock on a pro rata basis. Holders of Ensign common stock will receive cash in lieu of any fractional shares of CareTrust common stock which they would have otherwise received.
What is the record date for the Spin-Off?    Record ownership will be determined as of the close of business on                     , 2014.
When will the Spin-Off occur?    We expect that Ensign will distribute the shares of CareTrust common stock on                     , 2014, to holders of record of Ensign common stock as of the record date, subject to certain conditions described under “The Spin-Off—Conditions to the Spin-Off.”
What do stockholders need to do to participate in the Spin-Off?    No action is required on the part of stockholders. Stockholders who hold Ensign common stock as of the record date will not be required to take any action to receive shares of CareTrust common stock in the Spin-Off. No stockholder approval of the Spin-Off is required or sought. We are not asking you for a proxy, and you are requested not to send us a proxy.
If I sell my shares of Ensign common stock prior to the Spin-Off, will I still be entitled to receive shares of CareTrust in the Spin-Off?    If you hold shares of Ensign common stock as of the record date and decide to sell the shares prior to the distribution date, you may choose to sell such shares with or without your entitlement to receive shares of CareTrust common stock. If you sell your Ensign common stock in the “due-bills” market prior to the distribution date, you also will be selling your right to receive shares of CareTrust common stock in connection with the Spin-Off. However, if you sell your Ensign common stock in the “ex-distribution” market prior to the distribution date, you will still receive shares of CareTrust common stock in the Spin-Off.
   If you sell your Ensign common stock prior to the distribution date, you should make sure your bank or broker understands whether you want to sell your Ensign common stock or the CareTrust common stock you will receive in the Spin-Off or both. You should consult your financial advisors, such as your bank, broker or tax advisor, to discuss your options and alternatives. See “The Spin-Off—Listing and Trading of Our Shares” for additional details.
How will fractional shares be treated in the Spin-Off?    No fractional shares will be distributed in connection with the Spin-Off. Instead, holders of Ensign common stock will receive a cash payment equal to the value of such shares in lieu of fractional shares.

 

 

8


Table of Contents
Can Ensign decide to cancel the Spin-Off even if all the conditions have been satisfied?    Yes. The Spin-Off is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions. Until the Spin-Off has occurred, Ensign has the right to terminate the transaction, even if all of the conditions have been satisfied, if the board of directors of Ensign determines that the Spin-Off is not in the best interests of Ensign and its stockholders or that market conditions or other circumstances are such that the Spin-Off is no longer advisable at that time.
What are the conditions to the Spin-Off?    The Spin-Off is subject to the satisfaction of a number of conditions, including, among others:
  

•   the final approval by the board of directors of Ensign of the Spin-Off and all related transactions (and such approval not having been withdrawn) and determination of the record date;

  

•   CareTrust’s registration statement on Form 10 becoming effective under the Exchange Act, and no stop order relating to the registration statement being in effect;

  

•   the mailing by Ensign of this information statement to record holders of Ensign common stock as of the record date;

  

•   the IRS Ruling (as defined below), which provides, among other things, that the Spin-Off will qualify as a tax-free transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code, shall not have been revoked or modified in any material respect;

  

•   the receipt by Ensign of the Tax Opinion (as defined below), in form and substance satisfactory to Ensign in its sole and absolute discretion, to the effect that certain requirements for tax-free treatment, on which the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) will not rule, will be satisfied;

  

•   the receipt by CareTrust of an opinion, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to CareTrust, to the effect that, commencing with CareTrust’s taxable year ending on December 31, 2014, CareTrust has been organized in

  

conformity with the requirements for qualification as a REIT under the Code, and its proposed method of operation will enable it to meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT;

  

•   the receipt by CareTrust and Ensign of an opinion, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to CareTrust, substantially to the effect that the Master Leases will be respected as “true leases” for U.S. federal income tax purposes with respect to certain facilities;

 

 

9


Table of Contents
  

•   the approval of the listing of CareTrust’s common stock on NASDAQ, subject to official notice of issuance;

  

•   the completion by CareTrust of the financing transactions described in this information statement and contemplated to occur on or prior to the distribution date, including our Operating Partnership’s issuance of notes, our Operating Partnership’s entry into a revolving credit facility and the incurrence of additional mortgage indebtedness;

  

•   the transfer by CareTrust to Ensign of a portion of the proceeds from our Operating Partnership’s issuance of notes, and Ensign’s use of a portion of such transferred proceeds to repay certain indebtedness and trade payables;

  

•   the absence of any order, injunction or decree issued by any court of competent jurisdiction or other legal restraint or prohibition preventing consummation of the Spin-Off or any of the transactions related thereto, including the transfers of assets and liabilities contemplated by the Separation and Distribution Agreement;

  

•   the absence of any events or developments having occurred prior to the Spin-Off that, in the judgment of the board of directors of Ensign, would result in the Spin-Off having a material adverse effect on Ensign or its stockholders;

  

•   the adoption by CareTrust of its amended and restated charter and bylaws;

  

•   the execution by the parties of the Separation and Distribution Agreement and all other ancillary agreements relating to the Spin-Off, including the Master Leases; and

  

•   Ensign’s receipt of applicable regulatory approvals relating to the Spin-Off.

   We cannot assure you that any or all of the conditions will be satisfied or waived. See “The Spin-Off—Conditions to the Spin-Off” for additional details.
Does CareTrust intend to pay cash dividends?    Following the Spin-Off, CareTrust intends to make regular quarterly dividend payments of at least 90% of its REIT taxable income to holders of its common stock out of assets legally available for this purpose. Dividends will be authorized by CareTrust’s board of directors and declared by CareTrust based on a number of factors including actual results of operations, dividend restrictions under Maryland law, its liquidity and financial condition, its taxable income, the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code, its operating expenses and other factors its directors deem relevant. For more information, see “Dividend Policy.”

 

 

10


Table of Contents
What will happen to Ensign equity awards in connection with the separation?    It is expected that outstanding Ensign equity awards at the time of the Spin-Off will be treated as follows:
  

 

Restricted Stock. Awards of restricted Ensign common stock will be treated in the same manner as other shares of Ensign common stock, as described above.

   Stock Options. No changes will be made with respect to Ensign options other than adjustments in accordance with the equitable adjustment provisions set forth in the plans under which they were granted.
What will be the relationship between Ensign and CareTrust following the Spin-Off?    Ensign will not own any shares of CareTrust common stock following the Spin-Off. CareTrust and Ensign will enter into the Separation and Distribution Agreement, the Master Leases, the Opportunities Agreement, the Tax Matters Agreement, the Transition Services Agreement and the Employee Matters Agreement. Such agreements will govern CareTrust’s relationship with Ensign after the Spin-Off, including certain transition services, allocations of assets and liabilities and obligations attributable to periods prior to the Spin-Off, and indemnification arrangements for certain liabilities. See “Our Relationship with Ensign Following the Spin-Off.”
Will I receive physical certificates representing shares of CareTrust common stock following the Spin-Off?    No. Following the Spin-Off, neither Ensign nor CareTrust will be issuing physical certificates representing shares of CareTrust common stock. Instead, Ensign, with the assistance of Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions, Inc., the distribution agent, will electronically issue shares of CareTrust common stock to you or to your bank or brokerage firm on your behalf by way of direct registration in book-entry form. The distribution agent will mail you a book-entry account statement that reflects your shares of CareTrust common stock, or your bank or brokerage firm will credit your account for the shares. A benefit of issuing stock electronically in book-entry form is that there will be none of the physical handling and safekeeping responsibilities that are inherent in owning physical stock certificates. See “The Spin-Off—Manner of Effecting the Spin-Off.”
What will the price be for my shares of CareTrust common stock and when will I be able to trade such shares?    Ensign currently owns all of the outstanding shares of CareTrust common stock, so there is no current trading market for CareTrust common stock. CareTrust has applied to list its common stock on NASDAQ under the symbol “CTRE.” We anticipate that a limited market, commonly known as a “when-issued” trading market, will develop shortly before the record date, and that “regular-way” trading in shares of CareTrust common stock will begin on the first trading day following the distribution date. If trading begins on a “when-issued” basis, you may purchase or sell CareTrust common stock up to and including the distribution date, but your transaction will not settle until after the distribution date. We cannot predict the trading prices for CareTrust common stock before, on or after the distribution date.

 

 

11


Table of Contents
Will the number of shares of Ensign common stock that I own change as a result of the Spin-Off?    No. The number of shares of Ensign common stock you own will not change as a result of the Spin-Off.
Will my shares of Ensign common stock continue to trade after the Spin-Off?    Yes. Ensign common stock will continue to be listed and traded on NASDAQ under the symbol “ENSG.” See “The Spin-Off—Listing and Trading of Our Shares” for additional details.
Are there risks associated with owning CareTrust common stock?    Yes. CareTrust’s business is subject to both general and specific risks and uncertainties relating to its business, including risks specific to its industry and operations, its leverage, its relationship with Ensign and its status as a separate and independent publicly traded company. Its business is also subject to risks relating to the Spin-Off. These risks are summarized in the “Summary of Risks Associated with Our Business and the Spin-Off” section of this information statement beginning on page 5, and are described in more detail in the “Risk Factors” section of this information statement beginning on page 18. We encourage you to read those sections carefully.
Do I have appraisal rights in connection with the Spin-Off?    No. Ensign stockholders will not have any appraisal rights in connection with the Spin-Off.
What are the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Spin-Off?    Ensign has received a private letter ruling from the IRS substantially to the effect that, on the basis of certain facts presented and representations and assumptions set forth in the request submitted to the IRS, the Spin-Off will qualify as tax-free under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code (the “IRS Ruling”). The IRS Ruling does not address certain requirements for tax-free treatment of the Spin-Off under Section 355 of the Code, and Ensign expects to receive opinions from its tax advisors (collectively, the “Tax Opinion”), substantially to the effect that, with respect to such requirements on which the IRS will not rule, such requirements will be satisfied.
   The tax consequences to you of the Spin-Off depend on your individual situation. You are urged to consult with your tax advisor as to the particular tax consequences of the Spin-Off to you, including the applicability of any U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax laws. For additional details, see “The Spin-Off—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Spin-Off” and “U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.”
How will the Spin-Off affect my tax basis and holding period in Ensign common stock?    Assuming that the Spin-Off is tax-free to Ensign stockholders, your tax basis in Ensign common stock held by you immediately prior to the Spin-Off will be allocated between your Ensign common stock and CareTrust common stock that you receive in the Spin-Off in proportion to the relative fair market values of each immediately following the Spin-Off. Your holding period for such Ensign shares will not be affected by the Spin-Off. Your holding period for the shares of CareTrust common stock that you receive in the Spin-Off

 

 

12


Table of Contents
   will include the holding period of your shares of Ensign common stock, provided that such Ensign shares are held as capital assets immediately following the Spin-Off. Ensign will provide its stockholders with information to enable them to compute their tax basis in both Ensign and CareTrust common stock. This information will be posted on Ensign’s website, www.ensigngroup.net, promptly
   following the distribution date. See “The Spin-Off—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Spin-Off.” You are urged to consult with your tax advisor as to the particular tax consequences of the Spin-Off to you, including the applicability of any U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax laws.
What is the Purging Distribution?   

In order to comply with certain REIT qualification requirements, CareTrust will declare and pay a special dividend to distribute to its stockholders the portion of the accumulated earnings and profits, or “E&P,” of Ensign allocated to CareTrust in the Spin-Off. We refer to this special dividend as the “Purging Distribution” because it is intended to purge the company of earnings and profits attributable to the period prior to CareTrust’s first taxable year as a REIT. The amount of accumulated earnings and profits allocated to CareTrust in the Spin-Off will be based on applicable tax principles and will not correspond to retained earnings in historical financial statements because of differences between tax and book income and expenses. Ensign will allocate its accumulated earnings and profits for periods prior to the Spin-Off between Ensign and CareTrust in a manner that, in its best judgment, is in accordance with the provisions of the Code. We expect to make the Purging Distribution by December 31, 2014.

What will I receive in connection with the Purging Distribution?   

The total amount of Ensign’s E&P immediately prior to the Spin-Off is expected to be between $350.0 million and $385.0 million. The actual amount of Ensign’s E&P allocated to CareTrust will depend on the final determination of Ensign’s E&P and the relative trading value of CareTrust common stock and Ensign common stock following the Spin-Off. The Purging Distribution will be paid to CareTrust stockholders in a combination of cash and shares of CareTrust common stock with an aggregate value equal to Ensign’s E&P allocated to CareTrust. The portion that will be paid in cash will be determined by CareTrust at the time the dividend is declared, but will be at least 20% and not more than 25% of the total amount paid to all stockholders.

What are the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Purging Distribution?    Ensign has received the IRS Ruling, which addresses, in addition to the treatment of the Spin-Off, certain issues relevant to CareTrust’s payment of the Purging Distribution in a combination of cash and CareTrust stock. In general, the IRS Ruling provides, subject to the terms and conditions contained therein, that (1) any and all of the cash and stock distributed by CareTrust to its stockholders as part of the Purging Distribution will be treated as a distribution of property with respect to CareTrust stock, and as a dividend to the extent of CareTrust’s current and accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes) and (2) the amount of any distribution of stock received by any of CareTrust’s

 

 

13


Table of Contents
   stockholders as part of the Purging Distribution will be considered to equal the amount of the money which could have been received instead. In the Purging Distribution, a holder of CareTrust common stock will be required to report dividend income as a result of the Purging Distribution even if CareTrust distributes no cash or only nominal amounts of cash to such stockholder.
  

 

You are urged to consult with your tax advisor as to the particular tax consequences of the Purging Distribution to you, including the applicability of any U.S. federal, state and local and non-U.S. tax laws. See “The Spin-Off—The Purging Distribution.”

Who is the transfer agent for CareTrust shares?   

The transfer agent for our common stock is:

 

Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions

P.O. Box 1342

Brentwood, NY 11717

Phone: (800) 733-1121

Email: shareholder@broadridge.com

Where can I get more information?   

Before the Spin-Off, if you have any questions relating to the Spin-Off, and after the Spin-Off if you have any questions relating to Ensign or its common stock, you should contact Ensign at:

 

The Ensign Group, Inc.

27101 Puerta Real, Suite 450

Mission Viejo, CA 92691

Phone: (949) 487-9500

 

After the Spin-Off, if you have any questions relating to us or our common stock, you should contact us at:

 

CareTrust REIT, Inc.

27101 Puerta Real, Suite 400

Mission Viejo, CA 92691

Phone: (949) 540-2000

 

 

14


Table of Contents

Summary Historical and Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Data

The following table sets forth summary and selected financial data for Ensign Properties (as described below) on a historical basis, as well as for us on a pro forma basis. Prior to the Spin-Off, we will not have operated our business separate from Ensign. We use the term “Ensign Properties” to mean the carve-out business of the entities that own the skilled nursing, assisted living and independent living facilities that we will own following the Spin-Off, and the operations of the three independent living facilities that we will operate following the Spin-Off. Ensign Properties is the predecessor of CareTrust.

The summary historical financial data as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and for each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, has been derived from Ensign Properties’ audited combined financial statements included elsewhere in this information statement. The summary historical financial data as of March 31, 2014, and for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, has been derived from Ensign Properties’ unaudited condensed combined financial statements included elsewhere in this information statement. The summary historical financial data as of March 31, 2013 and as of the year ended December 31, 2011, has been derived from Ensign Properties’ unaudited condensed combined financial statements that are not included in this information statement. Our management believes the assumptions underlying Ensign Properties’ combined financial statements and accompanying notes are reasonable. However, such combined financial statements may not necessarily reflect our financial condition and results of operations in the future, or what they would have been had we been a separate, stand-alone company during the periods presented.

The unaudited pro forma combined financial data as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2014, and for the year ended December 31, 2013, has been derived from the pro forma combined financial statements included elsewhere in this information statement. This pro forma data gives effect to the Spin-Off and the related transactions, including: (i) additional rental income associated with new Master Leases between Ensign Properties and Ensign that were previously leased under intercompany lease agreements; (ii) the distribution of approximately 22.2 million shares of CareTrust common stock by Ensign to Ensign stockholders; (iii) the anticipated issuance by our Operating Partnership of up to $260.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes, and the anticipated interest expense related thereto; (iv) the transfer to Ensign of approximately $220.8 million of proceeds from the issuance of the notes in order for Ensign to repay certain indebtedness, pay trade payables and, subject to the approval of Ensign’s board of directors, pay up to eight regular quarterly dividends; (v) the incurrence of an additional $50.5 million of mortgage indebtedness, and the anticipated interest expense related thereto; and (vi) the elimination of income tax provisions in conjunction with the election of REIT status. The pro forma data does not give effect to the Purging Distribution which is expected to be made by December 31, 2014. The total amount of Ensign’s E&P immediately prior to the Spin-Off is expected to be between $350.0 million and $385.0 million. The actual amount of Ensign’s E&P allocated to CareTrust will depend on the final determination of Ensign’s E&P and the relative trading value of CareTrust common stock and Ensign common stock following the Spin-Off. The Purging Distribution will be paid in a combination of cash and CareTrust common stock with an aggregate value equal to Ensign’s E&P allocated to CareTrust. The portion that will be paid in cash will be determined by CareTrust at the time the dividend is declared, but will be at least 20% and not more than 25% of the total amount paid to all stockholders. The unaudited pro forma combined statements of income for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013 assume the Spin-Off and the related transactions occurred on January 1, 2013. The unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet assumes the Spin-Off and the related transactions occurred on March 31, 2014. The pro forma financial data is not necessarily indicative of what our actual financial condition and results of operations would have been as of the date and for the periods indicated if we had been a separate, stand-alone company during the periods presented, nor does it purport to represent our future financial condition or results of operations.

 

 

15


Table of Contents

The following should be read in conjunction with Ensign Properties’ combined financial statements and accompanying notes, our unaudited pro forma combined financial statements and accompanying notes, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” each of which are included elsewhere in this information statement.

 

     As of or For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
     As of or For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
     Pro Forma
2014
     2014     2013      Pro Forma
2013
     2013     2012      2011  
     (in thousands)  

Operating data:

                  

Total net revenues

   $ 15,849       $ 12,872      $ 11,336       $ 61,255       $ 48,796       $ 42,063          $ 31,941     
Income (loss) before
income taxes
   $ 979       $ (363   $ 592       $ 5,017       $ (272    $ 232          $ (6,514)    

Net income (loss)

   $ 979       $ (400   $ 570       $ 5,017       $ (395    $ 110          $ (5,341)    

Balance sheet data:

                  

Total assets

   $ 511,866       $ 437,303      $ 402,338       $ 505,525       $ 430,466       $ 398,978        $ 374,466   

Total liabilities

   $ 362,964       $ 264,579      $ 213,036       $ 364,730       $ 267,777       $ 214,430        $ 194,857   

Total equity

   $ 148,902       $ 172,724      $ 189,302       $ 140,795       $ 162,689       $ 184,548        $ 179,609   

Other financial data:

                  

FFO (1)

   $ 6,226       $ 5,799      $ 6,160       $ 24,484       $ 23,023       $ 21,213        $ 11,277   

FAD (1)

   $ 6,528       $ 5,978      $ 6,342       $ 25,693       $ 23,740       $ 21,933        $ 11,893   

 

(1) We believe that net income, as defined by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), is the most appropriate earnings measure. We also believe that Funds From Operations (“FFO”), as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”), and Funds Available for Distribution (“FAD”) are important non-GAAP supplemental measures of operating performance for a REIT. FFO is defined as net income computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses from real estate dispositions, plus real estate depreciation and amortization and impairment charges. FAD is defined as FFO excluding non-cash expenses such as stock-based compensation expense and amortization of deferred financing costs. We believe that the use of FFO and FAD, combined with the required GAAP presentations, improves the understanding of operating results of REITs among investors and makes comparisons of operating results among such companies more meaningful. We consider FFO and FAD to be useful measures for reviewing comparative operating and financial performance because, by excluding gains or losses from real estate dispositions, impairment charges and real estate depreciation and amortization, and, for FAD, by excluding non-cash expenses such as stock-based compensation expense and amortization of deferred financing costs, FFO and FAD can help investors compare our operating performance between periods and to other REITs. See further discussion of FFO and FAD in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Discussion of Historical Results of Operations of Ensign Properties—Non-GAAP Measurements.”

 

 

16


Table of Contents

The following table reconciles our calculations of FFO and FAD to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, and on a pro forma basis for the three months ended March 31, 2014, and the year ended December 31, 2013:

 

     For the Three Months Ended
March 31,
     For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
     Pro Forma
2014
     2014     2013      Pro Forma
2013
     2013     2012      2011  
    

(in thousands)

 
Net income (loss)    $ 979       $ (400   $ 570       $ 5,017       $ (395    $ 110        $ (5,341
Depreciation and amortization      5,247         6,199        5,590         19,467         23,418        21,103         16,618   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

FFO

     6,226         5,799        6,160         24,484         23,023        21,213         11,277   
Stock-based compensation      4         4        7         18         18        15         15   
Amortization of deferred financing costs      298         175        175         1,191         699        705         601   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 
FAD    $ 6,528       $ 5,978      $ 6,342       $ 25,693       $ 23,740       $ 21,933        $ 11,893   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Components of Our Revenues and Expenses Following the Spin-Off” for a discussion of our forecasted revenues, general and administrative expenses and interest expense amounts for the period following the Spin-Off.

 

 

17


Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the following risks and other information in this information statement in evaluating us and our common stock. Any of the following risks, as well as additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations, and could, in turn, impact the trading price of our common stock.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR SPIN-OFF FROM ENSIGN

We may be unable to achieve some or all the benefits that we expect to achieve from the Spin-Off.

The Spin-Off may not have the full or any strategic and financial benefits that we expect, or such benefits may be delayed or may not materialize at all. The anticipated benefits of the Spin-Off are based on a number of assumptions, which may prove incorrect. For example, we believe that the Spin-Off will allow us to expand into new geographic areas, acquire properties in different asset classes, diversify our tenant base and reduce our financing costs. In the event that the Spin-Off does not have these and other expected benefits for any reason, the costs associated with the transaction could have a negative effect on our financial condition and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

After the Spin-Off, we may be unable to make, on a timely or cost-effective basis, the changes necessary to operate as a separate and independent publicly traded company primarily focused on owning a portfolio of healthcare properties.

We have no historical operations as an independent company and may not, at the time of the Spin-Off, have the infrastructure and personnel necessary to operate as a separate and independent publicly traded company. As a result of the Spin-Off, immediately after the distribution date, we will be directly subject to, and responsible for, regulatory compliance, including the reporting and other obligations under the Exchange Act, the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and compliance with NASDAQ’s continued listing requirements, as well as compliance with generally applicable tax and accounting rules.

The Exchange Act requires that we file annual, quarterly, and current reports about our business and financial condition. Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we must maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, which require significant resources and management oversight. As an emerging growth company, we will be excluded from Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which otherwise would have required our auditors to formally attest to and report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. If we cannot maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures or favorably assess the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, or once we are no longer an emerging growth company, our independent registered public accounting firm cannot provide an unqualified attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, investor confidence and, in turn, the market price of our common stock could decline.

Upon the completion of the Spin-Off, Ensign will be obligated to provide certain transition services to us pursuant to the Transition Services Agreement, which will allow us time, if necessary, to build the infrastructure and retain the personnel necessary to operate as a separate and independent publicly traded company without relying on such transition services. Following the expiration of the Transition Services Agreement, Ensign will be under no obligation to provide further assistance to us. Because our business has not been operated as a separate and independent publicly traded company, we cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully implement the infrastructure or retain the personnel necessary to operate as a separate and independent publicly traded company or that we will not incur costs in excess of anticipated costs to establish such infrastructure and retain such personnel.

 

18


Table of Contents

If the Spin-Off were to fail to qualify as a tax-free transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes, Ensign, Ensign stockholders and we could be subject to significant tax liabilities and, in certain circumstances, we could be required to indemnify Ensign for material taxes pursuant to indemnification obligations under the Tax Matters Agreement that we will enter into with Ensign.

Ensign has received the IRS Ruling, which provides substantially to the effect that, on the basis of certain facts presented and representations and assumptions set forth in the request submitted to the IRS, the Spin-Off will qualify as tax-free under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code. The IRS Ruling does not address certain requirements for tax-free treatment of the Spin-Off under Section 355 of the Code, and Ensign expects to receive a Tax Opinion, substantially to the effect that, with respect to such requirements on which the IRS will not rule, such requirements will be satisfied. The IRS Ruling, and the Tax Opinion that Ensign expects to receive, rely on, among other things, certain facts, representations, assumptions and undertakings, including those relating to the past and future conduct of our and Ensign’s businesses, and the IRS Ruling and the Tax Opinion would not be valid if such facts, representations, assumptions and undertakings were incorrect in any material respect. Notwithstanding the IRS Ruling and the Tax Opinion, the IRS could determine the Spin-Off should be treated as a taxable transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes if it determines any of the facts, representations, assumptions or undertakings that will be included in the request for the IRS Ruling are false or have been violated or if it disagrees with the conclusions in the opinions that are not covered by the IRS Ruling. For more information regarding the IRS Ruling and the opinion, see “The Spin-Off—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Spin-Off.”

If the Spin-Off ultimately is determined to be taxable, then a stockholder of Ensign that received shares of our common stock in the Spin-Off would be treated as having received a distribution of property in an amount equal to the fair market value of such shares on the distribution date and could incur significant income tax liabilities. Such distribution would be taxable to such stockholder as a dividend to the extent of Ensign’s current and accumulated earnings and profits (including earnings and profits resulting from the recognition of gain by Ensign in the Spin-Off). Any amount that exceeded Ensign’s earnings and profits would be treated first as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of such stockholder’s tax basis in its shares of Ensign stock with any remaining amount being taxed as a capital gain. In addition, if the Spin-Off is determined to be taxable, Ensign would recognize taxable gain in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the shares of our common stock held by Ensign on the distribution date over Ensign’s tax basis in such shares. Such taxable gain and resulting tax liability would be substantial.

In addition, under the terms of the Tax Matters Agreement that we will enter into with Ensign, we generally will be responsible for any taxes imposed on Ensign that arise from the failure of the Spin-Off to qualify as tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes, within the meaning of Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code, to the extent such failure to qualify is attributable to certain actions, events or transactions relating to our stock, assets or business, or a breach of the relevant representations or any covenants made by us in the Tax Matters Agreement, the materials submitted to the IRS in connection with the request for the IRS Ruling or the representation letter provided in connection with the Tax Opinion relating to the Spin-Off. Our indemnification obligations to Ensign and its subsidiaries, officers and directors will not be limited by any maximum amount. If we are required to indemnify Ensign under the circumstance set forth in the Tax Matters Agreement, we may be subject to substantial tax liabilities. For more information regarding the Tax Matters Agreement, see “Our Relationship with Ensign Following the Spin-Off—Tax Matters Agreement.”

We may not be able to engage in desirable strategic transactions and equity issuances following the Spin-Off because of certain restrictions relating to requirements for tax-free distributions for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, we could be liable for adverse tax consequences resulting from engaging in significant strategic or capital-raising transactions.

Our ability to engage in significant strategic transactions and equity issuances may be limited or restricted after the Spin-Off in order to preserve, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the tax-free nature of the Spin-Off.

 

19


Table of Contents

Even if the Spin-Off otherwise qualifies for tax-free treatment under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code, it may result in corporate level taxable gain to Ensign under Section 355(e) of the Code if 50% or more, by vote or value, of shares of our stock or Ensign’s stock are acquired or issued as part of a plan or series of related transactions that includes the Spin-Off. The process for determining whether an acquisition or issuance triggering these provisions has occurred is complex, inherently factual and subject to interpretation of the facts and circumstances of a particular case. Any acquisitions or issuances of our stock or Ensign stock within a two-year period after the Spin-Off generally are presumed to be part of such a plan, although we or Ensign, as applicable, may be able to rebut that presumption.

Under the Tax Matters Agreement that we will enter into with Ensign, we also will generally be responsible for any taxes imposed on Ensign that arise from the failure of the Spin-Off to qualify as tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes, within the meaning of Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code, to the extent such failure to qualify is attributable to actions, events or transactions relating to our stock, assets or business, or a breach of the relevant representations or any covenants made by us in the Tax Matters Agreement, the materials submitted to the IRS in connection with the request for the IRS Ruling or the representation letter provided to counsel in connection with the Tax Opinion. For a more detailed description, see “Our Relationship with Ensign Following the Spin-Off—Tax Matters Agreement.”

Our agreements with Ensign may not reflect terms that would have resulted from arm’s-length negotiations with unaffiliated third parties.

The agreements related to the Spin-Off, including the Separation and Distribution Agreement, the Master Leases, the Opportunities Agreement, the Tax Matters Agreement, the Transition Services Agreement and the Employee Matters Agreement, will have been negotiated in the context of the Spin-Off while we are still a wholly owned subsidiary of Ensign. As a result, although those agreements are intended to reflect arm’s-length terms, they may not reflect terms that would have resulted from arm’s-length negotiations between unaffiliated third parties. Conversely, certain agreements related to the Spin-Off may include terms that are more favorable than those that would have resulted from arm’s-length negotiations among unaffiliated third parties. Following expiration of those agreements, we may have to enter into new agreements with unaffiliated third parties, and such agreements may include terms that are less favorable to us. The terms of the agreements being negotiated in the context of the Spin-Off concern, among other things, divisions and allocations of assets and liabilities and rights and obligations, between Ensign and us. For a more detailed description, see “Our Relationship with Ensign Following the Spin-Off.”

Until the Spin-Off occurs, Ensign has the sole discretion to change the terms of the Spin-Off in ways that may be unfavorable to us.

Until the Spin-Off occurs, Ensign’s board of directors will have the sole and absolute discretion to determine and change the terms of the Spin-Off, including the establishment of the record date and distribution date. These changes could be unfavorable to us. In addition, the Spin-Off is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of a number of conditions. For a more detailed description of these conditions, see the section entitled “The Spin-Off—Conditions to the Spin-Off.” We cannot assure you that any or all of these conditions will be met. The fulfillment of the conditions to the Spin-Off will not create any obligation on Ensign’s part to effect the Spin-Off. Ensign’s board of directors may, in its absolute and sole discretion, decide at any time prior to the Spin-Off not to proceed with the Spin-Off.

Ensign Properties’ combined historical financial data and our pro forma combined financial data included in this information statement do not purport to be indicative of the results we would have achieved as a separate and independent publicly traded company and may not be a reliable indicator of future results.

Ensign Properties’ combined historical financial data and our pro forma combined financial data included in this information statement may not reflect our business, financial position or results of operations had

 

20


Table of Contents

we been a separate and independent publicly traded company during the periods presented, or what our business, financial position or results of operations will be in the future when we are a separate and independent publicly traded company. Prior to the Spin-Off, our business will have been operated by Ensign as part of one corporate organization and not operated as a stand-alone company. Because we will not acquire ownership of the entities that own our real estate assets until immediately prior to the Spin-Off, there are no historical financial statements for us as we will exist following the Spin-Off. Significant changes will occur in our cost structure, financing and business operations as a result of our operation as a stand-alone company and the entry into transactions with Ensign that have not existed historically, including the Master Leases.

The pro forma financial data included in this information statement includes adjustments based upon available information that our management believes to be reasonable to reflect these factors. However, the assumptions may change or may be incorrect, and actual results may differ, perhaps significantly. In addition, the pro forma financial data does not include adjustments for estimated general and administrative expenses. For these reasons, our cost structure may be higher and our future financial costs and performance may be worse than the performance implied by the pro forma financial data presented in this information statement. For additional information about the basis of presentation of Ensign Properties’ combined historical financial data and our pro forma combined financial data included in this information statement, see “Financing,” “Capitalization,” “Summary—Summary Historical and Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Data,” “CareTrust’s Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements,” “Selected Combined Historical Financial Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Ensign Properties’ combined historical financial statements and accompanying notes, included elsewhere in this information statement.

The ownership by our chief executive officer, Gregory K. Stapley, and one of our directors, Christopher R. Christensen, of shares of Ensign common stock may create, or may create the appearance of, conflicts of interest.

Because of their current or former positions with Ensign, our chief executive officer, Gregory K. Stapley, and one of our directors, Christopher R. Christensen, own shares of Ensign common stock. After the Spin-Off, Mr. Stapley and Mr. Christensen will own shares of our common stock and Ensign common stock. Their individual holdings of shares of our common stock and Ensign common stock may be significant compared to their respective total assets. These equity interests may create, or appear to create, conflicts of interest when they are faced with decisions that may not benefit or affect CareTrust and Ensign in the same manner.

After the Spin-Off, Christopher R. Christensen, one of our directors, may have actual or potential conflicts of interest because of his position at Ensign.

After the Spin-Off, Christopher R. Christensen, one of our directors, will continue to serve as the chief executive officer of Ensign as well as a member of Ensign’s board of directors. As a result of Mr. Christensen’s service on our board of directors, transactions between Ensign and CareTrust in an amount in excess of $120,000 will be subject to our policy regarding related party transactions, and will require that Mr. Christensen recuse himself from consideration of such transactions. Although transactions pursuant to the agreements entered into prior to the Spin-Off, such as the Master Leases, will be pre-approved under this policy, new transactions between Ensign and CareTrust, or material changes to these agreements, will be subject to approval under the policy. However, circumstances may arise that are not subject to the policy in which Mr. Christensen will have or appear to have a potential conflict of interest, such as when our or Ensign’s management and directors pursue the same corporate opportunities or face decisions that could have different implications for us and Ensign.

 

21


Table of Contents

Ensign’s inability to obtain all material authorizations, consents, approvals and clearances of third parties including lenders and U.S. federal, state and local governmental agencies (“Third-Party Approvals”) in connection with the Spin-Off may have a material adverse effect on Ensign’s ability to consummate the Spin-Off.

Ensign may be required, or deem it desirable, to obtain certain Third-Party Approvals to consummate the Spin-Off and the restructuring of Ensign’s business in connection therewith, including consents of mortgage lenders. There is no assurance that Ensign will be able to obtain these Third-Party Approvals. Ensign may decide not to consummate the Spin-Off if it does not receive some or all of these Third-Party Approvals, unless it believes that the inability to obtain one or more Third-Party Approvals would not reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the business, financial position or results of operations of Ensign or us. However, there can be no assurance that such a material adverse effect will not occur.

The Spin-Off could give rise to disputes or other unfavorable effects, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial position or results of operations.

The Spin-Off may lead to increased operating and other expenses, of both a nonrecurring and a recurring nature, and to changes to certain operations, which expenses or changes could arise pursuant to arrangements made between Ensign and us or could trigger contractual rights of, and obligations to, third parties. Disputes with third parties could also arise out of these transactions, and we could experience unfavorable reactions to the Spin-Off from employees, lenders, ratings agencies, regulators or other interested parties. These increased expenses, changes to operations, disputes with third parties, or other effects could materially and adversely affect our business, financial position or results of operations. In addition, following the completion of the Spin-Off, disputes with Ensign could arise in connection with any of the Master Leases, the Opportunities Agreement, the Separation and Distribution Agreement, the Transition Services Agreement, the Employee Matters Agreement, the Tax Matters Agreement or other agreements.

Our potential indemnification liabilities pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement could materially and adversely affect us.

The Separation and Distribution Agreement between us and Ensign will provide for, among other things, the principal corporate transactions required to effect the Spin-Off, certain conditions to the Spin-Off and provisions governing the relationship between us and Ensign after the Spin-Off. For a description of the Separation and Distribution Agreement, see “Our Relationship with Ensign Following the Spin-Off—Separation and Distribution Agreement.” Among other things, the Separation and Distribution Agreement will provide for indemnification obligations designed to make us financially responsible for substantially all liabilities that may exist relating to or arising out of our business. If we are required to indemnify Ensign under the circumstances set forth in the Separation and Distribution Agreement, we may be subject to substantial liabilities.

In connection with the Spin-Off, Ensign will indemnify us for certain liabilities. However, there can be no assurance that these indemnities will be sufficient to insure us against the full amount of such liabilities, or that Ensign’s ability to satisfy its indemnification obligation will not be impaired in the future.

Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, the Tax Matters Agreement and other agreements we will enter into in connection with the Spin-Off, Ensign will agree to indemnify us for certain liabilities. However, third parties could seek to hold us responsible for any of the liabilities that Ensign will agree to retain pursuant to these agreements, and there can be no assurance that Ensign will be able to fully satisfy its indemnification obligations under these agreements. Moreover, even if we ultimately succeed in recovering from Ensign any amounts for which we are held liable, we may be temporarily required to bear these losses while seeking recovery from Ensign.

 

22


Table of Contents

The Spin-Off may expose us to potential liabilities arising out of state and federal fraudulent conveyance laws.

The Spin-Off and related transactions, including the Purging Distribution, are subject to review under various state and federal fraudulent conveyance laws. Under U.S. federal bankruptcy law and comparable provisions of state fraudulent transfer or conveyance laws, which vary from state to state, the Spin-Off or any of the related transactions could be voided as a fraudulent transfer or conveyance if Ensign (a) distributed property with the intent of hindering, delaying or defrauding creditors or (b) received less than reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration in return for such distribution, and one of the following is also true at the time thereof: (1) Ensign was insolvent or rendered insolvent by reason of the Spin-Off or any related transaction, (2) the Spin-Off or any related transaction left Ensign with an unreasonably small amount of capital or assets to carry on the business, or (3) Ensign intended to, or believed that, it would incur debts beyond its ability to pay as they mature.

As a general matter, value is given under U.S. law for a transfer or an obligation if, in exchange for the transfer or obligation, property is transferred or a valid antecedent debt is secured or satisfied. A debtor will generally not be considered to have received value under U.S. law in connection with a distribution to its stockholders.

We cannot be certain as to the standards a U.S. court would use to determine whether or not Ensign was insolvent at the relevant time. In general, however, a U.S. court would deem an entity insolvent if: (1) the sum of its debts, including contingent and unliquidated liabilities, was greater than the value of its assets, at a fair valuation; (2) the present fair saleable value of its assets was less than the amount that would be required to pay its probable liability on its existing debts, including contingent liabilities, as they become absolute and mature; or (3) it could not pay its debts as they became due.

If a U.S. court were to find that the Spin-Off was a fraudulent transfer or conveyance, a court could void the Spin-Off, require stockholders to return to Ensign some or all of the shares of common stock distributed in the Spin-Off or require stockholders to pay as money damages an equivalent of the value of the shares of common stock at the time of the Spin-Off. If a U.S. court were to find that the Purging Distribution was a fraudulent transfer or conveyance, a court could void the Purging Distribution, require stockholders to return to us some or all of the Purging Distribution or require stockholders to pay as money damages an equivalent of the value of the Purging Distribution. Moreover, stockholders could be required to return any dividends previously paid by us. With respect to any transfers from Ensign to us, if any such transfer was found to be a fraudulent transfer, a court could void the transaction or Ensign could be awarded monetary damages for the difference between the consideration received by Ensign and the fair market value of the transferred property at the time of the Spin-Off.

We are currently subject to applicable requirements of Ensign’s 2013 Corporate Integrity Agreement with the Office of the Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and we will remain subject to such requirements following the Spin-Off.

We are currently required to maintain a corporate compliance program pursuant to a corporate integrity agreement (the “CIA”) that Ensign entered into in October 2013 with the Office of the Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The CIA requires, among other things, that Ensign and its subsidiaries maintain such corporate compliance programs as part of compliance with various requirements of federal and private healthcare programs. After the Spin-Off, we will remain subject to certain continuing obligations as part of Ensign’s compliance program pursuant to the CIA, including training in Medicare and Medicaid laws for our employees. Failure to timely comply with the applicable terms of the CIA could result in substantial civil or criminal penalties, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

 

23


Table of Contents

RISKS RELATED TO OUR TAXATION AS A REIT

If we do not qualify to be taxed as a REIT, or fail to remain qualified as a REIT, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax as a regular corporation and could face a substantial tax liability, which would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

We intend to operate in a manner that will allow us to qualify to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which we currently expect to occur commencing with our taxable year ending December 31, 2014. References throughout this document to the “first taxable year” for which we have elected to be taxed as a REIT refer to the taxable year ending December 31, 2014. We expect to receive an opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP with respect to our qualification as a REIT in connection with this transaction. Investors should be aware, however, that opinions of advisors are not binding on the IRS or any court. The opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP represents only the view of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP based on its review and analysis of existing law and on certain representations as to factual matters and covenants made by us, including representations relating to the values of our assets and the sources of our income. The opinion is expressed as of the date issued. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP will have no obligation to advise us or the holders of our common stock of any subsequent change in the matters stated, represented or assumed or of any subsequent change in applicable law. Furthermore, both the validity of the opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP and our qualification as a REIT will depend on our satisfaction of certain asset, income, organizational, distribution, stockholder ownership and other requirements on a continuing basis, the results of which will not be monitored by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP. Our ability to satisfy the asset tests depends upon our analysis of the characterization and fair market values of our assets, some of which are not susceptible to a precise determination, and for which we will not obtain independent appraisals.

If we were to fail to qualify to be taxed as a REIT in any taxable year, we would be subject to U.S. federal income tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on our taxable income at regular corporate rates, and dividends paid to our stockholders would not be deductible by us in computing our taxable income. Any resulting corporate liability could be substantial and would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders, which in turn could have an adverse impact on the value of our common stock. Unless we were entitled to relief under certain Code provisions, we also would be disqualified from re-electing to be taxed as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which we failed to qualify to be taxed as a REIT.

Qualifying as a REIT involves highly technical and complex provisions of the Code.

Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Code provisions for which only limited judicial and administrative authorities exist. Even a technical or inadvertent violation could jeopardize our REIT qualification. Our qualification as a REIT will depend on our satisfaction of certain asset, income, organizational, distribution, stockholder ownership and other requirements on a continuing basis. In addition, our ability to satisfy the requirements to qualify to be taxed as a REIT may depend in part on the actions of third parties over which we have no control or only limited influence.

Legislative or other actions affecting REITs could have a negative effect on us.

The rules dealing with U.S. federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the U.S. Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”). Changes to the tax laws or interpretations thereof, with or without retroactive application, could materially and adversely affect our investors or us. We cannot predict how changes in the tax laws might affect our investors or us. New legislation, Treasury regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could significantly and negatively affect our ability to qualify to be taxed as a REIT or the U.S. federal income tax consequences to our investors and us of such qualification.

 

24


Table of Contents

On February 26, 2014, House Ways and Means Committee Chairman David Camp released a proposal (the “Camp Proposal”) for comprehensive tax reform. The Camp Proposal includes a number of provisions that, if enacted, would have an adverse effect on corporations seeking to make an election to be taxed as a REIT. These include the following: (i) if the stock of a corporation is distributed in a tax-free spin-off under section 355 of the Code, such corporation will not be eligible to make an election to be taxed as a REIT for the ten-year period following the taxable year in which the spin-off occurs, (ii) after the ten-year period, if the corporation elects to be taxed as a REIT, such corporation will be required to recognize certain built-in gains inherent in its property as if all its assets were sold at their fair market value immediately before the close of the taxable year immediately before the corporation became taxed as a REIT, and (iii) any dividend made to satisfy the REIT requirement that a REIT must not have any earnings and profits accumulated during non-REIT years by the end of its first tax year as a REIT must be made in cash instead of cash and stock as is permitted under current law. These provisions, if enacted in their current form, apply to any corporation making an election to be taxed as a REIT on or after February 26, 2014 and to any corporation the stock of which is distributed on or after February 26, 2014 in a tax-free spin-off under section 355 of the Code. If enacted in its current form, the Camp Proposal would materially and adversely affect our ability to make an election to be taxed as a REIT. See “If we do not qualify to be taxed as a REIT, or fail to remain qualified as a REIT, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax as a regular corporation and could face a substantial tax liability, which would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders.” It is uncertain whether the Camp Proposal, in its current form as it relates to CareTrust, or any other legislation affecting entities desiring to elect REIT status will be enacted and whether any such legislation will apply to CareTrust because of its proposed effective date or otherwise.

We could fail to qualify to be taxed as a REIT if income we receive from Ensign or its subsidiaries is not treated as qualifying income.

Under applicable provisions of the Code, we will not be treated as a REIT unless we satisfy various requirements, including requirements relating to the sources of our gross income. See “U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Taxation of REITs in General—Income Tests.” Rents received or accrued by us from Ensign or its subsidiaries will not be treated as qualifying rent for purposes of these requirements if the Master Leases are not respected as true leases for U.S. federal income tax purposes and are instead treated as service contracts, joint ventures or some other type of arrangement. If the Master Leases are not respected as true leases for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we will likely fail to qualify to be taxed as a REIT.

In addition, subject to certain exceptions, rents received or accrued by us from Ensign or its subsidiaries will not be treated as qualifying rent for purposes of these requirements if we or a beneficial or constructive owner of 10% or more of our stock beneficially or constructively owns 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of Ensign stock entitled to vote or 10% or more of the total value of all classes of Ensign stock. Our charter will provide for restrictions on ownership and transfer of our shares of stock, including restrictions on such ownership or transfer that would cause the rents received or accrued by us from Ensign or its subsidiaries to be treated as non-qualifying rent for purposes of the REIT gross income requirements. The provisions of our charter that will restrict the ownership and transfer of our stock are described in “Description of Our Capital Stock—Restrictions on Transfer and Ownership of CareTrust Stock.” Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that such restrictions will be effective in ensuring that rents received or accrued by us from Ensign or its subsidiaries will not be treated as qualifying rent for purposes of REIT qualification requirements.

Dividends payable by REITs do not qualify for the reduced tax rates available for some dividends.

The maximum U.S. federal income tax rate applicable to income from “qualified dividends” payable by U.S. corporations to U.S. stockholders that are individuals, trusts and estates is currently 20%. Dividends payable by REITs, however, generally are not eligible for the reduced rates. Although these rules do not adversely affect the taxation of REITs, the more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate qualified dividends could cause investors who are individuals, trusts and estates to perceive investments in REITs to be

 

25


Table of Contents

relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the value of the stock of REITs, including our stock.

REIT distribution requirements could adversely affect our ability to execute our business plan.

We generally must distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains, in order for us to qualify to be taxed as a REIT (assuming that certain other requirements are also satisfied) so that U.S. federal corporate income tax does not apply to earnings that we distribute. To the extent that we satisfy this distribution requirement and qualify for taxation as a REIT but distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and including any net capital gains, we will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on our undistributed net taxable income. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax if the actual amount that we distribute to our stockholders in a calendar year is less than a minimum amount specified under U.S. federal income tax laws. We intend to make distributions to our stockholders to comply with the REIT requirements of the Code.

Initially our funds from operations will be generated primarily by rents paid under the Master Leases. From time to time, we may generate taxable income greater than our cash flow as a result of differences in timing between the recognition of taxable income and the actual receipt of cash or the effect of nondeductible capital expenditures, the creation of reserves or required debt or amortization payments. If we do not have other funds available in these situations, we could be required to borrow funds on unfavorable terms, sell assets at disadvantageous prices or distribute amounts that would otherwise be invested in future acquisitions in order to make distributions sufficient to enable us to pay out enough of our taxable income to satisfy the REIT distribution requirement and to avoid being subject to corporate income tax and the 4% excise tax in a particular year. These alternatives could increase our costs or reduce our equity. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to grow, which could adversely affect the value of our common stock.

Even if we remain qualified as a REIT, we may face other tax liabilities that reduce our cash flow.

Even if we remain qualified for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain U.S. federal, state, and local taxes on our income and assets, including taxes on any undistributed income and state or local income, property and transfer taxes. See “U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Taxation of CareTrust.” For example, we may hold some of our assets or conduct certain of our activities through one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries (each, a “TRS”) or other subsidiary corporations that will be subject to U.S. federal, state, and local corporate-level income taxes as regular C corporations. In addition, we may incur a 100% excise tax on transactions with a TRS if they are not conducted on an arm’s-length basis. Any of these taxes would decrease cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Complying with REIT requirements may cause us to forgo otherwise attractive acquisition opportunities or liquidate otherwise attractive investments.

To qualify to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we must ensure that, at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and “real estate assets” (as defined in the Code). The remainder of our investments (other than government securities, qualified real estate assets and securities issued by a TRS) generally cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of our total assets (other than government securities, qualified real estate assets and securities issued by a TRS) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, and no more than 25% of the value of our total assets can be represented by securities of one or more TRSs. See “U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Taxation of CareTrust.” If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions to avoid losing our

 

26


Table of Contents

REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, we may be required to liquidate or forgo otherwise attractive investments. These actions could have the effect of reducing our income and amounts available for distribution to our stockholders.

In addition to the asset tests set forth above, to qualify to be taxed as a REIT we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders and the ownership of our stock. We may be unable to pursue investments that would be otherwise advantageous to us in order to satisfy the source-of-income or asset-diversification requirements for qualifying as a REIT. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to make certain attractive investments.

Complying with REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge effectively and may cause us to incur tax liabilities.

The REIT provisions of the Code substantially limit our ability to hedge our assets and liabilities. Income from certain hedging transactions that we may enter into to manage risk of interest rate changes with respect to borrowings made or to be made to acquire or carry real estate assets does not constitute “gross income” for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income tests that apply to REITs, provided that certain identification requirements are met. To the extent that we enter into other types of hedging transactions or fail to properly identify such transaction as a hedge, the income is likely to be treated as non-qualifying income for purposes of both of the gross income tests. See “U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Taxation of CareTrust.” As a result of these rules, we may be required to limit our use of advantageous hedging techniques or implement those hedges through a TRS. This could increase the cost of our hedging activities because the TRS may be subject to tax on gains or expose us to greater risks associated with changes in interest rates that we would otherwise want to bear. In addition, losses in the TRS will generally not provide any tax benefit, except that such losses could theoretically be carried back or forward against past or future taxable income in the TRS.

Even if we qualify to be taxed as a REIT, we could be subject to tax on any unrealized net built-in gains in our assets held before electing to be treated as a REIT.

Following our REIT election, we will own appreciated assets that were held by a C corporation and will be acquired by us in a transaction in which the adjusted tax basis of the assets in our hands will be determined by reference to the adjusted basis of the assets in the hands of the C corporation. If we dispose of any such appreciated assets during the ten-year period following our qualification as a REIT, we will be subject to tax at the highest corporate tax rates on any gain from such assets to the extent of the excess of the fair market value of the assets on the date that we became a REIT over the adjusted tax basis of such assets on such date, which are referred to as built-in gains. We would be subject to this tax liability even if we qualify and maintain our status as a REIT. Any recognized built-in gain will retain its character as ordinary income or capital gain and will be taken into account in determining REIT taxable income and our distribution requirement. Any tax on the recognized built-in gain will reduce REIT taxable income. We may choose not to sell in a taxable transaction appreciated assets we might otherwise sell during the ten-year period in which the built-in gain tax applies in order to avoid the built-in gain tax. However, there can be no assurances that such a taxable transaction will not occur. If we sell such assets in a taxable transaction, the amount of corporate tax that we will pay will vary depending on the actual amount of net built-in gain or loss present in those assets as of the time we became a REIT. The amount of tax could be significant.

 

27


Table of Contents

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

We will be dependent on Ensign to make payments to us under the Master Leases, and an event that materially and adversely affects Ensign’s business, financial position or results of operations could materially and adversely affect our business, financial position or results of operations.

Immediately following the Spin-Off, Ensign will be the lessee of substantially all of our properties pursuant to the Master Leases and, therefore, will be the source of substantially all of our revenues. Additionally, because each Master Lease is a triple-net lease, we will depend on Ensign to pay all insurance, taxes, utilities and maintenance and repair expenses in connection with these leased properties and to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless from and against various claims, litigation and liabilities arising in connection with its business. There can be no assurance that Ensign will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable it to satisfy its payment obligations under the Master Leases. The inability or unwillingness of Ensign to meet its rent obligations under the Master Leases could materially adversely affect our business, financial position or results of operations, including our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders as required to maintain our status as a REIT. The inability of Ensign to satisfy its other obligations under the Master Leases, such as the payment of insurance, taxes and utilities, could materially and adversely affect the condition of the leased properties as well as the business, financial position and results of operations of Ensign. For these reasons, if Ensign were to experience a material and adverse effect on its business, financial position or results of operations, our business, financial position or results of operations could also be materially and adversely affected.

Ensign and other healthcare operators to which we lease properties in the future are dependent on the healthcare industry and may be susceptible to the risks associated with healthcare reform, which could materially and adversely affect Ensign’s and our other tenants’ business, financial position or results of operations. In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the “Affordable Care Act”) were signed into law. Together, these two measures make the most sweeping and fundamental changes to the U.S. health care system since the creation of Medicare and Medicaid. These new laws include a large number of health-related provisions, including expanding Medicaid eligibility, requiring most individuals to have health insurance, establishing new regulations on health plans, establishing health insurance exchanges, and modifying certain payment systems to encourage more cost-effective care and a reduction of inefficiencies and waste, including through new tools to address fraud and abuse. Because substantially all of our properties will be used as healthcare properties, we will be impacted by the risks associated with the healthcare industry, including healthcare reform. While the expansion of healthcare coverage may result in some additional demand for services provided by Ensign and its subsidiaries, reimbursement may be lower than the cost required to provide such services, which could materially and adversely affect the ability of Ensign to generate profits and pay rent under the Master Leases.

Due to our dependence on rental payments from Ensign as our primary source of revenues, we may be limited in our ability to enforce our rights under, or to terminate, the Master Leases. Failure by Ensign to comply with the terms of the Master Leases or to comply with the healthcare regulations to which the leased properties are subject could require us to find another lessee for such leased property and there could be a decrease or cessation of rental payments by Ensign. In such event, we may be unable to locate a suitable lessee at similar rental rates or at all, which would have the effect of reducing our rental revenues.

Tenants that fail to comply with the requirements of, or changes to, governmental reimbursement programs such as Medicare or Medicaid, may cease to operate or be unable to meet their financial and other contractual obligations to us.

Ensign and other healthcare operators to which we lease properties in the future are subject to complex federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to governmental healthcare reimbursement programs. See “Business—Government Regulation, Licensing and Enforcement.” For the three months ended March 31, 2014

 

28


Table of Contents

and for the year ended December 31, 2013, Ensign received 71.1% and 72.2%, respectively, of its revenue from government payors, primarily Medicare and Medicaid. As a result, Ensign is, and future tenants may be, subject to the following risks, among others:

 

    statutory and regulatory changes;

 

    retroactive rate adjustments;

 

    recovery of program overpayments or set-offs;

 

    administrative rulings;

 

    policy interpretations;

 

    payment or other delays by fiscal intermediaries or carriers;

 

    government funding restrictions (at a program level or with respect to specific facilities); and

 

    interruption or delays in payments due to any ongoing governmental investigations and audits.

Healthcare reimbursement will likely continue to be of significant importance to federal and state authorities. We cannot make any assessment as to the ultimate timing or the effect that any future legislative reforms may have on our tenants’ costs of doing business and on the amount of reimbursement by government and other third-party payors. The failure of Ensign or any of our other tenants to comply with these laws, requirements and regulations could materially and adversely affect their ability to meet their financial and contractual obligations to us.

Tenants that fail to comply with federal, state and local licensure, certification and inspection laws and regulations may cease to operate our healthcare facilities or be unable to meet their financial and other contractual obligations to us.

Ensign and other healthcare operators to which we lease properties in the future are subject to extensive federal, state, local and industry-related licensure, certification and inspection laws, regulations and standards. Our tenants’ failure to comply with any of these laws, regulations or standards could result in loss of accreditation, denial of reimbursement, imposition of fines, suspension or decertification from federal and state healthcare programs, loss of license or closure of the facility. For example, operations at our properties may require a license, registration, certificate of need, provider agreement or certification. Failure of any tenant to obtain, or the loss of, any required license, registration, certificate of need, provider agreement or certification would prevent a facility from operating in the manner intended by such tenant. Additionally, failure of our tenants to generally comply with applicable laws and regulations could adversely affect facilities owned by us, and therefore could materially and adversely affect us. See “Business—Government Regulation, Licensing and Enforcement—Healthcare Licensure and Certificate of Need.”

Our tenants depend on reimbursement from government and other third-party payors; reimbursement rates from such payors may be reduced, which could cause our tenants’ revenues to decline and could affect their ability to meet their obligations to us.

The federal government and a number of states are currently managing budget deficits, which may put pressure on Congress and the states to decrease reimbursement rates for Ensign and other healthcare operators to which we lease properties in the future, with the goal of decreasing state expenditures under Medicaid programs. The need to control Medicaid expenditures may be exacerbated by the potential for increased enrollment in Medicaid due to unemployment and declines in family incomes. These potential reductions could be compounded by the potential for federal cost-cutting efforts that could lead to reductions in reimbursement to our tenants under both the Medicaid and Medicare programs. Potential reductions in Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement to our tenants could reduce the cash flow of our tenants and their ability to meet their obligations to us.

 

29


Table of Contents

The bankruptcy, insolvency or financial deterioration of our tenants could delay or prevent our ability to collect unpaid rents or require us to find new tenants.

We receive substantially all of our income as rent payments under leases of our properties. We have no control over the success or failure of the businesses of Ensign and other healthcare operators to which we may lease properties in the future and, at any time, any of our tenants may experience a downturn in its business that may weaken its financial condition. As a result, our tenants may fail to make rent payments when due or declare bankruptcy. Any tenant failures to make rent payments when due or tenant bankruptcies could result in the termination of the tenant’s lease and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. This risk is magnified in situations where we lease multiple properties to a single tenant, as a multiple property tenant failure could reduce or eliminate rental revenue from multiple properties.

If tenants are unable to comply with the terms of the leases, we may be forced to modify the leases in ways that are unfavorable to us. Alternatively, the failure of a tenant to perform under a lease could require us to declare a default, repossess the property, find a suitable replacement tenant, hire third-party managers to operate the property or sell the property. There is no assurance that we would be able to lease a property on substantially equivalent or better terms than the prior lease, or at all, find another qualified tenant, successfully reposition the property for other uses or sell the property on terms that are favorable to us. It may be more difficult to find a replacement tenant for a healthcare property than it would be to find a replacement tenant for a general commercial property due to the specialized nature of the business. Even if we are able to find a suitable replacement tenant for a property, transfers of operations of healthcare facilities are subject to regulatory approvals not required for transfers of other types of commercial operations, which may affect our ability to successfully transition a property.

If any lease expires or is terminated, we could be responsible for all of the operating expenses for that property until it is re-leased or sold. If we experience a significant number of un-leased properties, our operating expenses could increase significantly. Any significant increase in our operating costs may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

If one or more of our tenants files for bankruptcy relief, the U.S. federal Bankruptcy Code provides that a debtor has the option to assume or reject the unexpired lease within a certain period of time. Any bankruptcy filing by or relating to one of our tenants could bar all efforts by us to collect pre-bankruptcy debts from that tenant or seize its property. A tenant bankruptcy could also delay our efforts to collect past due balances under the leases and could ultimately preclude collection of all or a portion of these sums. It is possible that we may recover substantially less than the full value of any unsecured claims we hold, if any, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. Furthermore, dealing with a tenant’s bankruptcy or other default may divert management’s attention and cause us to incur substantial legal and other costs.

The geographic concentration of some of our facilities could leave us vulnerable to an economic downturn, regulatory changes or acts of nature in those areas.

Our properties are located in ten different states, with concentrations in Texas and California. The properties in these two states accounted for approximately 31% and 19%, respectively, of the total operational beds and units in our portfolio, as of March 31, 2014, and approximately 26% and 22%, respectively, of our rental income for the three months ended March 31, 2014, and approximately 26% and 22%, respectively, of our rental income for the year ended December 31, 2013. As a result of this concentration, the conditions of local economies and real estate markets, changes in governmental rules, regulations and reimbursement rates or criteria, changes in demographics, state funding, acts of nature and other factors that may result in a decrease in demand and/or reimbursement for skilled nursing services in these states could have a disproportionately adverse effect on our tenants’ revenue, costs and results of operations, which may affect their ability to meet their obligations to us. Our facilities located in Texas are especially susceptible to natural disasters such as hurricanes,

 

30


Table of Contents

tornadoes and flooding, and our facilities located in California are particularly susceptible to natural disasters such as fires, earthquakes and mudslides. These acts of nature may cause disruption to our tenants, their employees and our facilities, which could have an adverse impact on our tenants’ patients and businesses. In order to provide care for their patients, our tenants are dependent on consistent and reliable delivery of food, pharmaceuticals, utilities and other goods to our facilities, and the availability of employees to provide services at the facilities. If the delivery of goods or the ability of employees to reach our facilities were interrupted in any material respect due to a natural disaster or other reasons, it would have a significant impact on our facilities and our tenants’ businesses at those facilities. Furthermore, the impact, or impending threat, of a natural disaster may require that our tenants evacuate one or more facilities, which would be costly and would involve risks, including potentially fatal risks, for their patients. The impact of disasters and similar events is inherently uncertain. Such events could harm our tenants’ patients and employees, severely damage or destroy one or more of our facilities, harm our tenants’ business, reputation and financial performance, or otherwise cause our tenants’ businesses to suffer in ways that we currently cannot predict.

We intend to pursue acquisitions of additional properties and seek other strategic opportunities, which may result in the use of a significant amount of management resources or significant costs, and we may not fully realize the potential benefits of such transactions.

We intend to pursue acquisitions of additional properties and seek acquisitions and other strategic opportunities. Accordingly, we may often be engaged in evaluating potential transactions and other strategic alternatives. In addition, from time to time, we may engage in discussions that may result in one or more transactions. Although there is uncertainty that any of these discussions will result in definitive agreements or the completion of any transaction, we may devote a significant amount of our management resources to such a transaction, which could negatively impact our operations. We may incur significant costs in connection with seeking acquisitions or other strategic opportunities regardless of whether the transaction is completed and in combining our operations if such a transaction is completed. In the event that we consummate an acquisition or strategic alternative in the future, there is no assurance that we would fully realize the potential benefits of such a transaction.

We will operate in a highly competitive industry and face competition from other REITs, investment companies, private equity and hedge fund investors, sovereign funds, healthcare operators, lenders and other investors, some of whom are significantly larger and have greater resources and lower costs of capital. Increased competition will make it more challenging to identify and successfully capitalize on acquisition opportunities that meet our investment objectives. If we cannot identify and purchase a sufficient quantity of suitable properties at favorable prices or if we are unable to finance acquisitions on commercially favorable terms, our business, financial position or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Additionally, the fact that we must distribute 90% of our net taxable income in order to maintain our qualification as a REIT may limit our ability to rely upon rental payments from our leased properties or subsequently acquired properties in order to finance acquisitions. As a result, if debt or equity financing is not available on acceptable terms, further acquisitions might be limited or curtailed.

Acquisitions of properties we might seek to acquire entail risks associated with real estate investments generally, including that the investment’s performance will fail to meet expectations or that the tenant, operator or manager will underperform.

Required regulatory approvals can delay or prohibit transfers of our healthcare properties, which could result in periods in which we are unable to receive rent for such properties.

Some of our tenants will be operators of skilled nursing and other healthcare facilities, which operators must be licensed under applicable state law and, depending upon the type of facility, certified or approved as providers under the Medicare and/or Medicaid programs. Prior to the transfer of the operations of such healthcare properties to successor operators, the new operator generally must become licensed under state law and, in

 

31


Table of Contents

certain states, receive change of ownership approvals under certificate of need laws (which provide for a certification that the state has made a determination that a need exists for the beds located on the property) and, if applicable, Medicare and Medicaid provider approvals. If an existing lease is terminated or expires and a new tenant is found, then any delays in the new tenant receiving regulatory approvals from the applicable federal, state or local government agencies, or the inability to receive such approvals, may prolong the period during which we are unable to collect the applicable rent.

We may be required to incur substantial renovation costs to make certain of our healthcare properties suitable for other operators and tenants.

Healthcare facilities are typically highly customized and may not be easily adapted to non-healthcare-related uses. The improvements generally required to conform a property to healthcare use, such as upgrading electrical, gas and plumbing infrastructure, are costly and at times tenant-specific. A new or replacement tenant to operate one or more of our healthcare facilities may require different features in a property, depending on that tenant’s particular operations. If a current tenant is unable to pay rent and vacates a property, we may incur substantial expenditures to modify a property before we are able to secure another tenant. Also, if the property needs to be renovated to accommodate multiple tenants, we may incur substantial expenditures before we are able to release the space. These expenditures or renovations could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We may not be able to sell properties when we desire because real estate investments are relatively illiquid, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial position or results of operations.

Real estate investments generally cannot be sold quickly. In addition, some of our properties will serve as collateral for our secured debt obligations and cannot readily be sold unless the underlying mortgage indebtedness is concurrently repaid. We may not be able to vary our portfolio promptly in response to changes in the real estate market. A downturn in the real estate market could materially and adversely affect the value of our properties and our ability to sell such properties for acceptable prices or on other acceptable terms. We also cannot predict the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of a property or portfolio of properties. These factors and any others that would impede our ability to respond to adverse changes in the performance of our properties could materially and adversely affect our business, financial position or results of operations.

Our level of indebtedness could materially and adversely affect our financial position, including reducing funds available for other business purposes and reducing our operational flexibility, and we may have future capital needs and may not be able to obtain additional financing on acceptable terms.

In connection with the Spin-Off, we anticipate that our Operating Partnership will issue up to $260.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes, and will enter into a credit agreement providing for a revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to $150.0 million, although we have not yet entered into commitments with respect to such financing arrangements. We expect that approximately $220.8 million of the proceeds from the issuance of the senior unsecured notes will be transferred to Ensign in connection with the Spin-Off. In addition, at the time of the Spin-Off, we anticipate that our subsidiaries will have aggregate mortgage indebtedness to third parties of approximately $99.0 million secured by ten of the facilities to be owned by us following completion of the Spin-Off. Although it is anticipated that our debt agreements will restrict the amount of our indebtedness, we may incur additional indebtedness in the future to refinance our existing indebtedness, refinance mortgages on our properties or to finance newly-acquired properties. Any significant additional indebtedness could require a substantial portion of our cash flow to make interest and principal payments due on our indebtedness. Greater demands on our cash resources may reduce funds available to us to pay dividends, make capital expenditures and acquisitions, or carry out other aspects of

 

32


Table of Contents

our business strategy. Increased indebtedness can also limit our ability to adjust rapidly to changing market conditions, make us more vulnerable to general adverse economic and industry conditions and create competitive disadvantages for us compared to other companies with relatively lower debt levels. Increased future debt service obligations may limit our operational flexibility, including our ability to acquire properties, finance or refinance our properties, contribute properties to joint ventures or sell properties as needed.

Moreover, our ability to obtain additional financing and satisfy our financial obligations under indebtedness outstanding from time to time will depend upon our future operating performance, which is subject to then prevailing general economic and credit market conditions, including interest rate levels and the availability of credit generally, and financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. A worsening of credit market conditions could materially and adversely affect our ability to obtain financing on favorable terms, if at all.

We may be unable to obtain additional financing or financing on favorable terms or our operating cash flow may be insufficient to satisfy our financial obligations under indebtedness outstanding from time to time (if any). Among other things, the absence of an investment grade credit rating or any credit rating downgrade could increase our financing costs and could limit our access to financing sources. If financing is not available when needed, or is available on unfavorable terms, we may be unable to complete acquisitions or otherwise take advantage of business opportunities or respond to competitive pressures, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Covenants in our debt agreements may limit our operational flexibility, and a covenant breach or default could materially and adversely affect our business, financial position or results of operations.

The agreements governing our indebtedness are expected to contain customary covenants, which may limit our operational flexibility. The notes are expected to have terms customary for notes of this type, including customary restrictive covenants, redemption and repurchase provisions and events of default; and the revolving credit facility is expected to contain customary affirmative and negative covenants, as well as customary events of default. We also anticipate that the revolving credit facility will require us to comply with specified financial maintenance covenants. In addition, mortgages on certain of our properties contain customary covenants such as those that restrict our ability, without the consent of the lender, to further encumber or sell the applicable properties or replace the applicable tenant. Such consent could be difficult or expensive to obtain. Breaches of certain covenants may result in defaults under the mortgages on our properties and cross-defaults under certain of our other indebtedness, even if we satisfy our payment obligations to the respective obligee. In addition, defaults under the Master Leases, including defaults associated with the bankruptcy of the applicable tenants, may result in defaults under the mortgages on certain of our properties and cross-defaults under certain of our other indebtedness.

Covenants that limit our operational flexibility, as well as covenant breaches or defaults under our debt instruments, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial position or results of operations, or our ability to incur additional indebtedness or refinance existing indebtedness.

An increase in market interest rates could increase our interest costs on existing and future debt and could adversely affect our stock price.

If interest rates increase, so could our interest costs for any new debt and our variable rate debt obligations on the revolving credit facility. This increased cost could make the financing of any acquisition more costly, as well as lower our current period earnings. Rising interest rates could limit our ability to refinance existing debt when it matures or cause us to pay higher interest rates upon refinancing. In addition, an increase in interest rates could decrease the access third parties have to credit, thereby decreasing the amount they are willing to pay for our assets and consequently limiting our ability to reposition our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions. Further, the dividend yield on our common stock, as a percentage of the price of such common stock, will influence the price of such common stock. Thus, an increase in market

 

33


Table of Contents

interest rates may lead prospective purchasers of our common stock to expect a higher dividend yield, which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Our charter will restrict the ownership and transfer of our outstanding stock, which may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or change of control of our company.

In order for us to qualify to be taxed as a REIT, not more than 50% in value of our outstanding shares of stock may be owned, beneficially or constructively, by five or fewer individuals at any time during the last half of each taxable year after our first taxable year as a REIT. Additionally, at least 100 persons must beneficially own our stock during at least 335 days of a taxable year (other than our first taxable year as a REIT). Our charter, with certain exceptions, will authorize our board of directors to take such actions as are necessary and desirable to preserve our qualification as a REIT. Our charter will also provide that, unless exempted by the board of directors, no person may own more than 9.8% in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of our common stock, or more than 9.8% in value of the outstanding shares of all classes or series of our stock. See “Description of Our Capital Stock—Restrictions on Transfer and Ownership of CareTrust Stock” and “U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.” The constructive ownership rules are complex and may cause shares of stock owned directly or constructively by a group of related individuals or entities to be constructively owned by one individual or entity. These ownership limits could delay or prevent a transaction or a change in control of us that might involve a premium price for shares of our stock or otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders. The acquisition of less than 9.8% of our outstanding stock by an individual or entity could cause that individual or entity to own constructively in excess of 9.8% in value of our outstanding stock, and thus violate our charter’s ownership limit. Our charter will also prohibit any person from owning shares of our stock that would result in our being “closely held” under Section 856(h) of the Code or otherwise cause us to fail to qualify to be taxed as a REIT. In addition, our charter will provide that (i) no person shall beneficially or constructively own shares of stock to the extent such beneficial or constructive ownership of stock would result in us failing to qualify as a “domestically controlled qualified investment entity” within the meaning of Section 897(h) of the Code, and (ii) no person shall beneficially or constructively own shares of stock to the extent such beneficial or constructive ownership would cause us to own, beneficially or constructively, more than a 9.9% interest (as set forth in Section 856(d)(2)(B) of the Code) in a tenant of our real property. Any attempt to own or transfer shares of our stock in violation of these restrictions may result in the transfer being automatically void.

Maryland law and provisions in our charter and bylaws may delay or prevent takeover attempts by third parties and therefore inhibit our stockholders from realizing a premium on their stock.

Our charter and bylaws will contain, and Maryland law contains, provisions that are intended to deter coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids and to encourage prospective acquirors to negotiate with our board of directors rather than to attempt a hostile takeover. Our charter and bylaws will, among other things (1) contain transfer and ownership restrictions on the percentage by number and value of outstanding shares of our stock that may be owned or acquired by any stockholder; (2) provide that stockholders are not allowed to act by non-unanimous written consent; (3) permit the board of directors, without further action of the stockholders, to amend the charter to increase or decrease the aggregate number of authorized shares or the number of shares of any class or series that we have the authority to issue; (4) permit the board of directors to classify or reclassify any unissued shares of common or preferred stock and set the preferences, rights and other terms of the classified or reclassified shares; (5) permit only the board of directors to amend the bylaws; (6) establish certain advance notice procedures for stockholder proposals, and provide procedures for the nomination of candidates for our board of directors; (7) provide that special meetings of stockholders may only be called by the Company or upon written request of stockholders entitled to be at the meeting; (8) provide that a director may only be removed by stockholders for cause and upon the vote of two-thirds of the outstanding shares of common stock; (9) provide for supermajority approval requirements for amending or repealing certain provisions in our charter; and (10) provide for a classified board of directors of three separate classes with staggered terms.

 

34


Table of Contents

In addition, specific anti-takeover provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law (“MGCL”) could make it more difficult for a third party to attempt a hostile takeover. These provisions include:

 

    “business combination” provisions that, subject to limitations, prohibit certain business combinations between us and an “interested stockholder” (defined generally as any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of our shares or an affiliate thereof) for five years after the most recent date on which the stockholder becomes an interested stockholder, and thereafter impose special appraisal rights and special stockholder voting requirements on these combinations; and

 

    “control share” provisions that provide that “control shares” of our company (defined as shares which, when aggregated with other shares controlled by the stockholder, entitle the stockholder to exercise one of three increasing ranges of voting power in electing directors) acquired in a “control share acquisition” (defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of ownership or control of “control shares”) have no voting rights except to the extent approved by our stockholders by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding all interested shares.

We believe these provisions will protect our stockholders from coercive or otherwise unfair takeover tactics by requiring potential acquirors to negotiate with our board of directors and by providing our board of directors with more time to assess any acquisition proposal. These provisions are not intended to make us immune from takeovers. However, these provisions will apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by some stockholders and could delay or prevent an acquisition that our board of directors determines is not in our best interests. These provisions may also prevent or discourage attempts to remove and replace incumbent directors.

If we lose our key management personnel, we may not be able to successfully manage our business and achieve our objectives.

Our success depends in large part upon the leadership and performance of our executive management team, particularly Gregory K. Stapley and other key employees. If we lose the services of Mr. Stapley or any of our other key employees, we may not be able to successfully manage our business or achieve our business objectives.

We or our tenants may experience uninsured or underinsured losses, which could result in a significant loss of the capital we have invested in a property, decrease anticipated future revenues or cause us to incur unanticipated expense.

The Master Leases will require, and new lease agreements that we enter into are expected to require, that the tenant maintain comprehensive liability and hazard insurance, and we will maintain customary insurance for the independent living facilities that we own and operate. However, there are certain types of losses (including, but not limited to, losses arising from environmental conditions or of a catastrophic nature, such as earthquakes, hurricanes and floods) that may be uninsurable or not economically insurable. Insurance coverage may not be sufficient to pay the full current market value or current replacement cost of a loss. Inflation, changes in building codes and ordinances, environmental considerations, and other factors also might make it infeasible to use insurance proceeds to replace the property after such property has been damaged or destroyed. Under such circumstances, the insurance proceeds received might not be adequate to restore the economic position with respect to such property.

If one of our properties experiences a loss that is uninsured or that exceeds policy coverage limits, we could lose the capital invested in the damaged property as well as the anticipated future cash flows from the property. If the damaged property is subject to recourse indebtedness, we could continue to be liable for the indebtedness even if the property is irreparably damaged.

In addition, even if damage to our properties is covered by insurance, a disruption of business caused by a casualty event may result in loss of revenue for our tenants or us. Any business interruption insurance may

 

35


Table of Contents

not fully compensate them or us for such loss of revenue. If one of our tenants experiences such a loss, it may be unable to satisfy its payment obligations to us under its lease with us.

Environmental compliance costs and liabilities associated with real estate properties owned by us may materially impair the value of those investments.

Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, as a current or previous owner of real estate, we may be required to investigate and clean up certain hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum released at a property, and may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage and for investigation and cleanup costs incurred by the third parties in connection with the contamination. In addition, some environmental laws create a lien on the contaminated site in favor of the government for damages and the costs it incurs in connection with the contamination. Ensign does not carry, and following the Spin-Off we do not expect to carry, environmental insurance on our properties. Although we will generally require our tenants, as operators of our healthcare properties, to undertake to indemnify us for environmental liabilities they cause, such liabilities could exceed the financial ability of the tenant to indemnify us or the value of the contaminated property. The presence of contamination or the failure to remediate contamination may materially adversely affect our ability to sell or lease the real estate or to borrow using the real estate as collateral. As the owner of a site, we may also be held liable to third parties for damages and injuries resulting from environmental contamination emanating from the site. Although we will be generally indemnified by our tenants for contamination caused by them, these indemnities may not adequately cover all environmental costs. We may also experience environmental liabilities arising from conditions not known to us.

The impact of healthcare reform legislation on us and our tenants cannot accurately be predicted.

Legislative proposals are introduced or proposed in Congress and in some state legislatures each year that would affect major changes in the healthcare system, either nationally or at the state level. We cannot accurately predict whether any future legislative proposals will be adopted or, if adopted, what effect, if any, these proposals would have on our tenants and, thus, our business.

Notably, in March 2010, President Obama signed into law the Affordable Care Act. The passage of the Affordable Care Act has resulted in comprehensive reform legislation that is expected to expand healthcare coverage to millions of currently uninsured people beginning in 2014 and provide for significant changes to the U.S. healthcare system over the next several years. To help fund this expansion, the Affordable Care Act outlines certain reductions in Medicare reimbursements for various healthcare providers, including long-term acute care hospitals and skilled nursing facilities, as well as certain other changes to Medicare payment methodologies. This comprehensive healthcare legislation provides for extensive future rulemaking by regulatory authorities, and also may be altered or amended. While we can anticipate that some of the rulemaking that will be promulgated by regulatory authorities will affect our tenants and the manner in which they are reimbursed by the federal healthcare programs, we cannot accurately predict today the impact of those regulations on our tenants and, thus, on our business.

The Supreme Court’s decision upholding the constitutionality of the individual mandate while striking down the provisions linking federal funding of state Medicaid programs with a federally mandated expansion of those programs has not reduced the uncertain impact that the law will have on healthcare delivery systems over the next decade. We can expect that the federal authorities will continue to implement the law, but, because of the Supreme Court’s mixed ruling, the implementation will take longer than originally expected, with a commensurate increase in the period of uncertainty regarding the law’s full long term financial impact on the delivery of and payment for healthcare.

Other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted since the Affordable Care Act was enacted, which also may impact our business. For instance, on April 1, 2014, the President signed the Protecting Access to

 

36


Table of Contents

Medicare Act of 2014, which, among other things, requires the Centers for Medicare & and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) to measure, track, and publish readmission rates of skilled nursing facilities by 2017 and implement a value-based purchasing program for skilled nursing facilities (the “SNF VBP Program”) by October 1, 2018. The SNF VBP Program will increase Medicare reimbursement rates for skilled nursing facilities that achieve certain levels of quality performance measures to be developed by CMS, relative to other facilities. The value-based payments authorized by the SNF VBP Program will be funded by reducing Medicare payment for all SNFs by 2% and redistributing up to 70% of those funds to high-performing skilled nursing facilities. If Medicare reimbursement provided to our healthcare tenants is reduced under the SNF VBP Program, that reduction may have an adverse impact on the ability of our tenants to meet their obligations to us.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK

There is no existing market for our common stock and a trading market that will provide you with adequate liquidity may not develop for our common stock. In addition, once our common stock begins trading, the market price and trading volume of our common stock may fluctuate widely.

Ensign currently owns all of the outstanding shares of our common stock, so there is no current trading market for our common stock. Our common stock issued in the Spin-Off will be trading publicly for the first time. We anticipate that a limited market, commonly known as a “when-issued” trading market, will develop shortly before the record date, and that “regular-way” trading in shares of our common stock will begin on the first trading day following the distribution date. However, there can be no assurance that an active trading market for our common stock will develop as a result of the Spin-Off or be sustained in the future. The lack of an active trading market may make it more difficult for you to sell your shares and could lead to our share price being depressed or more volatile.

For many reasons, including the risks identified in this information statement, the market price of our common stock following the Spin-Off may be more volatile than the market price of Ensign common stock before the Spin-Off. These factors may result in short-term or long-term negative pressure on the value of our common stock.

We cannot predict the prices at which our common stock may trade after the Spin-Off. The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly, depending upon many factors, some of which may be beyond our control, including, but not limited to:

 

    a shift in our investor base;

 

    our quarterly or annual earnings, or those of other comparable companies;

 

    actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results;

 

    our ability to obtain financing as needed;

 

    changes in laws and regulations affecting our business;

 

    changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations or principles;

 

    announcements by us or our competitors of significant investments, acquisitions or dispositions;

 

    the failure of securities analysts to cover our common stock after the Spin-Off;

 

    changes in earnings estimates by securities analysts or our ability to meet those estimates;

 

    the operating performance and stock price of other comparable companies;

 

    overall market fluctuations; and

 

    general economic conditions and other external factors.

 

37


Table of Contents

Stock markets in general have experienced volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of a particular company. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

The combined post-Spin-Off value of Ensign common stock and our common stock may not equal or exceed the pre-Spin-Off value of Ensign common stock.

We cannot assure you that the combined trading prices of Ensign common stock and our common stock after the Spin-Off will be equal to or greater than the trading price of Ensign common stock prior to the Spin-Off. Until the market has fully evaluated the business of Ensign without our business, the price at which Ensign common stock trades may fluctuate more significantly than might otherwise be typical. Similarly, until the market has fully evaluated the stand-alone business of our company, the price at which shares of our common stock trades may fluctuate more significantly than might otherwise be typical, including volatility caused by general market conditions.

Substantial sales of our common stock may occur in connection with the Spin-Off, which could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

Our common stock that Ensign intends to distribute in the Spin-Off generally may be sold immediately in the public market. Although we have no actual knowledge of any plan or intention on the part of any holder of Ensign common stock to sell our common stock on or after the record date, it is possible that some Ensign stockholders will decide to sell some or all of the shares of our common stock that they receive in the Spin-Off.

In addition, some of the holders of Ensign common stock are index funds tied to stock or investment indices, or are institutional investors bound by various investment guidelines. Companies are generally selected for investment indices, and in some cases selected by institutional investors, based on factors such as market capitalization, industry, trading liquidity and financial condition. As an independent company, we expect to initially have a lower market capitalization than Ensign has today, and our business will differ from the business of Ensign prior to the Spin-Off. As a result, our common stock may not qualify for those investment indices. In addition, our common stock may not meet the investment guidelines of some institutional investors. Consequently, these index funds and institutional investors may have to sell some or all of our common stock they receive in the Spin-Off.

The sale of significant amounts of our common stock, the perception in the market that this will occur or the sale by holders of Ensign common stock that are index funds or institutional investors of some or all of our common stock, may cause the price of our common stock to fall. Any such decline could impair our ability to raise capital through future sales of our common stock. Further, our common stock may not qualify for other investment indices, including indices specific to REITs, and any such failure may discourage new investors from investing in our common stock.

Following the Spin-Off, we will be an emerging growth company and cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our common stock less attractive to investors.

Following the Spin-Off, we will be an emerging growth company as defined in the JOBS Act. For as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies. We have elected to take advantage of some of these exemptions and may elect to take advantage of others. If we do take advantage of all of these exemptions, we will not be required to, among other things, (1) provide an auditor’s attestation report on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our system of internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, (2) comply with any new rules that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board requiring mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report in which the auditor would be required to provide additional information about the audit and the financial statements of the issuer, (3) comply with any new

 

38


Table of Contents

audit rules adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board after April 5, 2012 unless the SEC determines otherwise, (4) comply with any new or revised financial accounting standards applicable to public companies until such standards are also applicable to private companies under Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act, (5) provide certain disclosure regarding executive compensation required of larger public companies in our periodic reports, proxy statements and registration statements, or (6) hold a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and obtain stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. Accordingly, the information that we provide stockholders in this information statement and in our other filings with the SEC may be different than what is available with respect to other public companies. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive if we decide to rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile and adversely affected.

In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards applicable to public companies. In other words, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to take advantage of this extended transition period. As a result of this election, our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates for such new or revised standards. We may elect to comply with public company effective dates at any time, and such election would be irrevocable pursuant to Section 107(b) of the JOBS Act.

We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (1) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our total annual gross revenues exceed $1 billion, (2) the date on which we are deemed to be a “large accelerated filer,” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act or any successor statute, which would occur if the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, (3) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three-year period, and (4) the end of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the date of the first sale of our common stock pursuant to an effective registration statement filed under the Securities Act.

Failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could materially and adversely affect our business and the market price of our common stock.

Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we must maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, which require significant resources and management oversight. Internal control over financial reporting is complex and may be revised over time to adapt to changes in our business, or changes in applicable accounting rules. We cannot assure you that our internal control over financial reporting will be effective in the future or that a material weakness will not be discovered with respect to a prior period for which we had previously believed that internal controls were effective. Matters impacting our internal controls may cause us to be unable to report our financial data on a timely basis, or may cause us to restate previously issued financial data, and thereby subject us to adverse regulatory consequences, including sanctions or investigations by the SEC, or violations of applicable stock exchange listing rules. There could also be a negative reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of investor confidence in us and the reliability of our financial statements. Confidence in the reliability of our financial statements is also likely to suffer if we or our independent registered public accounting firm reports a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. This could materially adversely affect us by, for example, leading to a decline in the market price for our comment stock and impairing our ability to raise capital.

As an emerging growth company, we will be excluded from Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which otherwise would have required our auditors to formally attest to and report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. If we cannot maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures or favorably assess the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, or once we are no longer an

 

39


Table of Contents

“emerging growth company,” our independent registered public accounting firm cannot provide an unqualified attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, investor confidence and, in turn, the market price of our common stock could decline.

We cannot assure you of our ability to pay dividends in the future.

We expect to make quarterly dividend payments in cash in an amount equal to approximately 80% of our FAD, but in no event will the annual dividend be less than 90% of our REIT taxable income on an annual basis, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains. Our ability to pay dividends may be adversely affected by a number of factors, including the risk factors described in this information statement. Dividends will be authorized by our board of directors and declared by us based upon a number of factors, including actual results of operations, restrictions under Maryland law or applicable debt covenants, our financial condition, our taxable income, the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code, our operating expenses and other factors our directors deem relevant. We cannot assure you that we will achieve investment results that will allow us to make a specified level of cash dividends or year-to-year increases in cash dividends in the future.

Furthermore, while we are required to pay dividends in order to maintain our REIT status (as described above under “Risks Related to Our Taxation as a REIT—REIT distribution requirements could adversely affect our ability to execute our business plan”), we may elect not to maintain our REIT status, in which case we would no longer be required to pay such dividends. Moreover, even if we do elect to maintain our REIT status, after completing various procedural steps, we may elect to comply with the applicable distribution requirements by distributing, under certain circumstances, a portion of the required amount in the form of shares of our common stock in lieu of cash. If we elect not to maintain our REIT status or to satisfy any required distributions in shares of common stock in lieu of cash, such action could negatively affect our business and financial condition as well as the market price of our common stock. No assurance can be given that we will pay any dividends on shares of our common stock in the future.

We may issue preferred stock with terms that could dilute the voting power or reduce the value of our common stock.

While we have no specific plan to issue preferred stock, our charter will authorize us to issue, without the approval of our stockholders, one or more classes or series of preferred stock having such designations, powers, privileges, preferences, including preferences over our common stock respecting dividends and distributions, terms of redemption and relative participation, optional or other rights, if any, of the shares of each such series of preferred stock and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, as our board of directors may determine. The terms of one or more classes or series of preferred stock could dilute the voting power or reduce the value of our common stock. For example, the repurchase or redemption rights or liquidation preferences we could assign to holders of preferred stock could affect the residual value of the common stock. For a more detailed description, see “Description of Our Capital Stock—Preferred Stock.”

ERISA may restrict investments by plans in our common stock.

A plan fiduciary considering an investment in our common stock should consider, among other things, whether such an investment is consistent with the fiduciary obligations under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), including whether such investment might constitute or give rise to a prohibited transaction under ERISA, the Code or any substantially similar federal, state or local law and, if so, whether an exemption from such prohibited transaction rules is available.

 

40


Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements in this information statement may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Those forward-looking statements include all statements that are not historical statements of fact and those regarding our intent, belief or expectations, including, but not limited to, statements regarding: the anticipated timing, structure, benefits and tax treatment of the Spin-Off; future financing plans, business strategies, growth prospects and operating and financial performance; expectations regarding the making of distributions and the payment of dividends; and compliance with and changes in governmental regulations.

Words such as “anticipate(s),” “expect(s),” “intend(s),” “plan(s),” “believe(s),” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “seek(s)” and similar expressions, or the negative of these terms, are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are based on management’s current expectations and beliefs and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could lead to actual results differing materially from those projected, forecasted or expected. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that our expectations will be attained. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future prospects or which could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include, but are not limited to:

 

    the ability to achieve some or all the benefits that we expect to achieve from the Spin-Off;

 

    delays or the nonoccurrence of the consummation of the Spin-Off;

 

    the ability and willingness of Ensign to meet and/or perform its obligations under any contractual arrangements that are entered into with us in connection with the Spin-Off, including the Master Leases, and any of its obligations to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless from and against various claims, litigation and liabilities;

 

    the ability of Ensign to comply with laws, rules and regulations in the operation of the properties we will lease to it following the Spin-Off;

 

    the ability and willingness of our tenants, including Ensign, to renew their leases with us upon their expiration, and the ability to reposition our properties on the same or better terms in the event of nonrenewal or in the event we replace an existing tenant, and obligations, including indemnification obligations, we may incur in connection with the replacement of an existing tenant;

 

    the availability of and the ability to identify suitable acquisition opportunities and the ability to acquire and lease the respective properties on favorable terms;

 

    the ability to generate sufficient cash flows to service our outstanding indebtedness;

 

    access to debt and equity capital markets;

 

    fluctuating interest rates;

 

    the ability to retain our key management personnel;

 

    the ability to qualify or maintain our status as a REIT;

 

    changes in the U.S. tax law and other state, federal or local laws, whether or not specific to REITs;

 

    other risks inherent in the real estate business, including potential liability relating to environmental matters and illiquidity of real estate investments; and

 

    additional factors discussed in the sections entitled “Business,” “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this information statement.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this information statement. Except in the normal course of our public disclosure obligations, we expressly disclaim any obligation to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect any change in our expectations or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any statement is based.

 

41


Table of Contents

THE SPIN-OFF

Background of the Spin-Off

On November 7, 2013, the board of directors of Ensign announced a plan to separate its healthcare business and its real estate business into two separate and independent publicly traded companies:

 

    Ensign, which will continue to provide healthcare services through its existing operations; and

 

    CareTrust, which will own, acquire and lease real estate serving the healthcare industry.

Ensign will accomplish the separation by contributing to CareTrust the entities that own the CareTrust Properties and the entities that operate three independent living facilities, and then distributing all of the outstanding shares of CareTrust to Ensign’s stockholders. Immediately prior to the Spin-Off, CareTrust and Ensign will enter into the Master Leases, under which Ensign will lease CareTrust’s healthcare facilities on a triple-net basis. Ensign and CareTrust will also enter into a number of other agreements to govern the relationship between them following the Spin-Off. See “Our Relationship with Ensign Following the Spin-Off.”

Upon the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions to the Spin-Off, which are described in more detail in “—Conditions to the Spin-Off” below, Ensign will effect the Spin-Off by distributing to Ensign’s stockholders one share of CareTrust common stock for each share of Ensign common stock that they held at the close of business on                     , 2014, the record date for the Spin-Off. We expect the shares of CareTrust common stock to be distributed by Ensign on                     , 2014.

You will not be required to make any payment, surrender or exchange your shares of Ensign common stock or take any other action to receive your shares of our common stock.

CareTrust intends to elect to be taxed and intends to qualify as a REIT for U.S. Federal income tax purposes commencing with its taxable year ending December 31, 2014. In order to comply with certain REIT qualification requirements, CareTrust will declare and distribute a special dividend to its stockholders equal to the amount of accumulated earnings and profits, or “E&P,” allocated to CareTrust in the Spin-Off. We refer to this special dividend as the “Purging Distribution” because it is intended to purge the company of earnings and profits attributable to the period prior to CareTrust’s first taxable year as a REIT. We expect to make the Purging Distribution by December 31, 2014. The total amount of Ensign’s E&P immediately prior to the Spin-Off is expected to be between $350.0 million and $385.0 million. The actual amount of Ensign’s E&P allocated to CareTrust will depend on the final determination of Ensign’s E&P and the relative trading value of CareTrust common stock and Ensign common stock following the Spin-Off. The Purging Distribution will be paid to CareTrust stockholders in a combination of cash and shares of CareTrust common stock with an aggregate value equal to Ensign’s E&P allocated to CareTrust. The portion that will be paid in cash will be determined by CareTrust at the time the dividend is declared, but will be at least 20% and not more than 25% of the total amount paid to all stockholders. See “—The Purging Distribution.”

The Spin-Off is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions. Until the Spin-Off has occurred, Ensign has the right to terminate the transaction, even if all of the conditions have been satisfied, if the board of directors of Ensign determines that the Spin-Off is not in the best interests of Ensign and its stockholders or that market conditions or other circumstances are such that the Spin-Off is no longer advisable at that time. We cannot provide any assurances that the Spin-Off will be completed. For a more detailed description of these conditions, see the section entitled “—Conditions to the Spin-Off” below.

Reasons for the Spin-Off

Strategic considerations and the nature of Ensign’s healthcare business currently dictate and limit the size and scope of its real estate business. After the Spin-Off, CareTrust will be able to make decisions regarding the real estate business without regard to the Ensign healthcare business. As a result, CareTrust intends to expand into new geographic areas, acquire properties in different asset classes, diversify its tenant base and reduce its financing costs. At the same time, Ensign expects to realize benefits from being a “pure play”

 

42


Table of Contents

healthcare operator and intends to continue to pursue its historical growth practices and strategies. As such, management, regulators, market analysts and investors will be able to focus solely on Ensign’s healthcare operations.

Geographic Expansion by CareTrust

Ensign’s business model is focused on, among other things, operating its healthcare business using a “cluster” system, pursuant to which groups of geographically-proximate operations share clinical best practices, real-time financial data, and other resources and information, in order to control costs and improve operating results. In addition, Ensign’s growth strategy into new markets may be affected by the availability of management leadership. In contrast, CareTrust will have the flexibility to enter geographic markets without facing the same operational considerations Ensign is confronted with as a healthcare operator.

Diversification of CareTrust Asset Classes

CareTrust intends to pursue opportunities with respect to both performing and nonperforming properties. Ensign primarily acquires skilled nursing and assisted living facilities that it will operate, occasionally acquiring non-healthcare independent living properties either (1) as part of a larger portfolio containing skilled nursing and/or assisted living facilities, or (2) with a view toward converting such properties to assisted living facilities. Following the Spin-Off, CareTrust, as a real estate company, will have the flexibility to choose which markets, asset classes and prospective tenants to pursue based solely on the exigencies and opportunities associated with the real estate business. CareTrust is expected to acquire not only skilled nursing and assisted living properties but also diversify into different property categories, such as medical office buildings, long-term acute care hospitals and inpatient rehabilitation facilities, and expand its portfolio of independent living properties. CareTrust may also engage in an expanded range of real estate related business activities, such as the provision of mortgage financing.

Diversification of Tenant Base

As a stand-alone company, CareTrust will be able, and intends, to take on tenants other than Ensign and divide large portfolios among numerous tenant operators, thus reducing the credit and regulatory risks associated with a single tenant. CareTrust anticipates that, as a real estate company, it will form business relationships with a diverse group of healthcare operators and that these relationships could lead to property acquisition opportunities.

Evaluation of Different Businesses Using Appropriate Operating Metrics

The Spin-Off will allow management, regulators, market analysts and investors to evaluate CareTrust as a stand-alone real estate company, and Ensign as a “pure play” healthcare operator, in each case, using appropriate industry metrics. Thus, we expect the Spin-Off will improve and simplify reporting and transparency in both businesses.

Reduced Risks and Financing Costs of the Real Estate Business

Healthcare companies are subject to unique regulatory, litigation, and reimbursement risks. As a result, healthcare companies generally have a higher cost of capital than real estate companies, and their shares typically trade at a lower earnings multiple. In contrast, CareTrust, which will enter into triple-net leases with its skilled nursing and senior housing tenants, will primarily be subject to simple premises liability risks, and the credit risks associated with its tenants. As CareTrust diversifies both its tenant base and its asset classes, we expect that its aggregate credit risk, regulatory risk and cost of capital may decline.

More Attractive Acquisition and Compensation Currency

The Spin-Off will make CareTrust and Ensign “pure plays” in their respective fields of real estate and healthcare, which should appeal to different groups of potential investors, making it easier and less costly to raise

 

43


Table of Contents

equity capital to advance their business plans. After the Spin-Off, we expect CareTrust and Ensign will be able to use their shares as consideration for acquisitions in a more effective manner with less dilution to existing stockholders. We expect the Spin-Off will also enhance the value and effectiveness of any equity incentive programs at Ensign and CareTrust because any equity (or equity based awards) will be more closely aligned with the performance of each company’s business.

Manner of Effecting the Spin-Off

The general terms and conditions relating to the Spin-Off will be set forth in the Separation and Distribution Agreement between us and Ensign. Under the Separation and Distribution Agreement, the Spin-Off is anticipated to be effective as of                     , 2014.

For each share of Ensign common stock that you owned at the close of business on                     , 2014, the record date, you will receive one share of our common stock on the distribution date. The actual total number of shares of our common stock to be distributed will depend on the number of shares of Ensign common stock outstanding on the record date. The shares of our common stock to be distributed will constitute 100% of the outstanding shares of our common stock.

Neither we nor Ensign will be issuing physical certificates representing shares of our common stock. Instead, if you own Ensign common stock as of the close of business on the record date, the shares of our common stock that you are entitled to receive in the Spin-Off will be issued electronically, as of the distribution date, to you or to your bank or brokerage firm on your behalf by way of direct registration in book-entry form. A benefit of issuing stock electronically in book-entry form is that there will be none of the physical handling and safekeeping responsibilities that are inherent in owning physical stock certificates.

If you hold physical stock certificates that represent your shares of Ensign common stock and you are the registered holder of the Ensign shares represented by those certificates, the distribution agent will mail you an account statement that reflects the number of shares of our common stock that have been registered in book-entry form in your name. If you have any questions concerning the mechanics of having shares of Ensign common stock registered in book-entry form, you are encouraged to contact The Ensign Group, Inc. c/o Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions by mail at P.O. Box 1342 Brentwood, NY 11717, by phone at (800) 733-1121 or by email at shareholder@broadridge.com.

Most Ensign stockholders hold their shares of Ensign common stock through a bank or brokerage firm. In such cases, the bank or brokerage firm would be said to hold the stock in “street name” and ownership would be recorded on the bank or brokerage firm’s books. If you hold your Ensign common stock through a bank or brokerage firm, your bank or brokerage firm will credit your account for the shares of our common stock that you are entitled to receive in the Spin-Off. If you have any questions concerning the mechanics of having shares of our common stock held in “street name,” you are encouraged to contact your bank or brokerage firm.

Results of the Spin-Off

After the Spin-Off, we will be a separate and independent publicly traded company. Immediately following the Spin-Off, we expect to have approximately 198 stockholders of record, based on the number of registered stockholders of Ensign common stock on May 6, 2014, and 22,431,318 shares of our common stock outstanding. The actual number of shares to be distributed will be determined on the record date and will reflect any changes in the number of shares of Ensign common stock between May 6, 2014 and the record date. The Spin-Off will not affect the number of outstanding shares of Ensign common stock or any rights of Ensign stockholders.

Prior to the Spin-Off, we and Ensign will enter into the Master Leases, under which Ensign will lease CareTrust’s healthcare facilities on a triple-net basis. Ensign and CareTrust will also enter into a number of other agreements to govern their relationship following the Spin-Off, and divide and allocate various assets and liabilities and rights and obligations. For a more detailed description of these agreements, see the section entitled “Our Relationship With Ensign Following the Spin-Off.”

 

44


Table of Contents

Treatment of Fractional Shares

The transfer agent will not distribute any fractional shares of our common stock in connection with the Spin-Off. Instead, the transfer agent will aggregate all fractional shares of our common stock into whole shares and sell them on the open market at the prevailing market prices on behalf of those registered holders who otherwise would be entitled to receive a fractional share. We anticipate that these sales will occur as soon as practicable after the distribution date. The transfer agent will then distribute to such registered holders the aggregate cash proceeds of such sale, in an amount equal to their pro rata share of the total proceeds of those sales. Any applicable expenses, including brokerage fees, will be paid by us. We do not expect the amount of any such fees to be material to us.

If you hold physical stock certificates that represent your shares of Ensign common stock and you are the registered holder of the Ensign shares represented by those certificates, your check for any cash that you may be entitled to receive instead of fractional shares of our common stock will be mailed to you separately. If you hold your shares of Ensign common stock through a bank or brokerage firm, your bank or brokerage firm will receive, on your behalf, your pro rata share of the aggregate net cash proceeds from the sales and will electronically credit your account for your share of such proceeds.

Neither we, nor Ensign or the transfer agent, will guarantee any minimum sale price for the fractional shares of our common stock. Neither we nor Ensign will pay any interest on the proceeds from the sale of fractional shares. The receipt of cash in lieu of fractional shares will generally be taxable to the recipient stockholders. Each stockholder entitled to receive cash proceeds from these fractional shares should consult his, her or its own tax advisor as to the stockholder’s particular circumstances. See “—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Spin-Off.”

Listing and Trading of Our Shares

Ensign currently owns all of the outstanding shares of CareTrust common stock, so there is no current trading market for CareTrust common stock. A condition to the Spin-Off is the listing of our common stock on NASDAQ. We have applied to list our common stock on NASDAQ under the symbol “CTRE.”

Beginning shortly before the record date and continuing up to and including the distribution date, we expect that there will be two markets in Ensign common stock: a “due-bills” market and an “ex-distribution” market. Shares of Ensign common stock that trade on the “due-bills” market will trade with an entitlement to shares of our common stock distributed pursuant to the Spin-Off. Shares that trade on the “ex-distribution” market will trade without an entitlement to shares of our common stock distributed pursuant to the Spin-Off. Therefore, if you own shares of Ensign common stock at the close of business on the record date and sell those shares on the “due-bills” market before the distribution date, you will be selling your right to receive shares of our common stock in connection with the Spin-Off. If you own shares of Ensign common stock at the close of business on the record date and sell those shares on the “ex-distribution” market before the distribution date, you will still receive the shares of our common stock that you would be entitled to receive pursuant to your ownership of the shares of Ensign common stock on the record date.

Furthermore, beginning shortly before the record date and continuing up to and including the distribution date, we expect that a limited market, commonly known as a “when-issued” trading market, will develop in our common stock. “When-issued” trading refers to a sale or purchase made conditionally because the security has been authorized but not yet issued. The “when-issued” trading market will be a market for shares of our common stock that will be distributed to Ensign stockholders on the distribution date. If you own shares of Ensign common stock at the close of business on the record date, you will be entitled to shares of our common stock distributed pursuant to the Spin-Off. You may trade this entitlement to shares of our common stock, without trading the shares of Ensign common stock you own, on the “when-issued” market. On the first trading day following the distribution date, “when-issued” trading with respect to our common stock will end and “regular-way” trading will begin.

 

45


Table of Contents

The Purging Distribution

In order to comply with certain REIT qualification requirements, CareTrust will declare and distribute a special dividend to its stockholders equal to the amount of accumulated earnings and profits, or “E&P,” allocated to CareTrust in the Spin-Off. We refer to this special dividend as the “Purging Distribution” because it is intended to purge the company of earnings and profits attributable to the period prior to CareTrust’s first taxable year as a REIT. The amount of accumulated earnings and profits allocated to CareTrust in the Spin-Off will be based on applicable tax principles and will not correspond to retained earnings in historical financial statements because of differences between tax and book income and expenses. Ensign will allocate its accumulated earnings and profits for periods prior to the Spin-Off between Ensign and CareTrust in a manner that, in its best judgment, is in accordance with the provisions of the Code. We expect to make the Purging Distribution by December 31, 2014.

The total amount of Ensign’s E&P immediately prior to the Spin-Off is expected to be between $350.0 million and $385.0 million. The actual amount of Ensign’s E&P allocated to CareTrust will depend on the final determination of Ensign’s E&P and the relative trading value of CareTrust common stock and Ensign common stock following the Spin-Off. The Purging Distribution will be paid to CareTrust stockholders in a combination of cash and shares of CareTrust common stock with an aggregate value equal to Ensign’s E&P allocated to CareTrust. The portion that will be paid in cash will be determined by CareTrust at the time the dividend is declared, but will be at least 20% and not more than 25% of the total amount paid to all stockholders. After the dividend is declared, each CareTrust stockholder will have an opportunity to elect to receive the entire dividend in either cash or stock. If too many stockholders elect cash, cash will be allocated among those stockholders on a pro rata basis and the balance paid to them in shares. If too many stockholders elect shares, then cash will be allocated among those stockholders on a pro rata basis. The number of shares of stock issued in the Purging Distribution will be determined based on the market price of our stock.

Ensign has received the IRS Ruling, which addresses, in addition to the treatment of the Spin-Off, certain issues relevant to CareTrust’s payment of the Purging Distribution in a combination of cash and CareTrust common stock. In general, the IRS Ruling provides, subject to the terms and conditions contained therein, that (1) any and all of the cash and stock distributed by CareTrust to its stockholders as part of the Purging Distribution will be treated as a distribution of property with respect to CareTrust stock, and as a dividend to the extent of CareTrust’s current and accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes) and (2) the amount of any distribution of stock received by any of CareTrust’s stockholders as part of the Purging Distribution will be considered to equal the amount of the money which could have been received instead. In the Purging Distribution, a holder of CareTrust common stock will be required to report dividend income as a result of the Purging Distribution even if CareTrust distributes no cash or only nominal amounts of cash to such stockholder.

You are urged to consult with your tax advisor as to the particular tax consequences of the Purging Distribution to you, including the applicability of any U.S. federal, state and local and non-U.S. tax laws.

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Spin-Off

The following is a summary of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences to Ensign and to the holders of shares of Ensign common stock in connection with the Spin-Off. This summary is based on the Code, the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, and judicial and administrative interpretations thereof, all as in effect as of the date of this information statement and all of which are subject to differing interpretations and may change at any time, possibly with retroactive effect. Any such change could affect the tax consequences described below. This summary assumes that the Spin-Off will be consummated in accordance with the Separation and Distribution Agreement and as described in this information statement.

Except as specifically described below, this summary is limited to holders of shares of Ensign common stock that are U.S. Holders, as defined immediately below. For purposes of this summary, a U.S. Holder is a beneficial owner of Ensign common stock that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:

 

    an individual who is a citizen or a resident of the U.S.;

 

46


Table of Contents
    a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, created or organized under the laws of the U.S. or any state thereof or the District of Columbia;

 

    an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or

 

    a trust, if (1) a court within the U.S. is able to exercise primary jurisdiction over its administration and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all of its substantial decisions, or (2) in the case of a trust that was treated as a domestic trust under the law in effect before 1997, a valid election is in place under applicable Treasury Regulations.

This summary also does not discuss all tax considerations that may be relevant to stockholders in light of their particular circumstances, nor does it address the consequences to stockholders subject to special treatment under the U.S. federal income tax laws, such as:

 

    dealers or traders in securities or currencies;

 

    tax-exempt entities;

 

    cooperatives;

 

    banks, trusts, financial institutions, or insurance companies;

 

    persons who acquired shares of Ensign common stock pursuant to the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation;

 

    stockholders who own, or are deemed to own, at least 10% or more, by voting power or value, of Ensign equity;

 

    holders owning Ensign common stock as part of a position in a straddle or as part of a hedging, conversion, constructive sale, synthetic security, integrated investment, or other risk reduction transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes;

 

    certain former citizens or former long-term residents of the U.S.;

 

    holders who are subject to the alternative minimum tax; or

 

    persons that own Ensign common stock through partnerships or other pass-through entities.

This summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences to Ensign stockholders who do not hold shares of Ensign common stock as a capital asset. Moreover, this summary does not address any state, local, or foreign tax consequences or any estate, gift or other non-income tax consequences.

If a partnership (or any other entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds shares of Ensign common stock, the tax treatment of a partner in that partnership will generally depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Such a partner or partnership is urged to consult its tax advisor as to the tax consequences of the Spin-Off.

YOU ARE URGED TO CONSULT WITH YOUR TAX ADVISOR AS TO THE SPECIFIC U.S. FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL, AND NON-U.S. TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE SPIN-OFF IN LIGHT OF YOUR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES AND THE EFFECT OF POSSIBLE CHANGES IN LAW THAT MIGHT AFFECT THE TAX CONSEQUENCES DESCRIBED IN THIS INFORMATION STATEMENT.

 

47


Table of Contents

Treatment of the Spin-Off

Ensign has received the IRS Ruling, which provides substantially to the effect that, on the basis of certain facts presented and representations and assumptions set forth in the request submitted to the IRS for such IRS Ruling, the Spin-Off will qualify as tax-free under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code. The IRS Ruling does not address certain requirements for tax-free treatment of the Spin-Off under Section 355 of the Code, and Ensign expects to receive the Tax Opinion on certain aspects of the tax treatment of the Spin-Off not addressed by the IRS in the IRS Ruling.

Assuming the Spin-Off qualifies under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:

 

    no gain or loss will be recognized by Ensign as a result of the Spin-Off;

 

    no gain or loss will be recognized by, or be includible in the income of, a holder of Ensign common stock solely as a result of the receipt of our common stock in the Spin-Off;

 

    the aggregate tax basis of the shares of Ensign common stock and shares of our common stock, including any fractional share deemed received, in the hands of each Ensign stockholder immediately after the Spin-Off will be the same as the aggregate tax basis of the shares of Ensign common stock held by such holder immediately before the Spin-Off, allocated between the shares of Ensign common stock and shares of our common stock, including any fractional share deemed received, in proportion to their relative fair market values immediately following the Spin-Off;

 

    the holding period with respect to shares of our common stock received by Ensign stockholders will include the holding period of their shares of Ensign common stock, provided that such shares of Ensign common stock are held as capital assets immediately following the Spin-Off;

 

    Ensign stockholders that have acquired different blocks of Ensign common stock at different times or at different prices are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the allocation of their aggregate adjusted basis among, and their holding period of, our shares distributed with respect to blocks of Ensign common stock; and

 

    a holder of Ensign common stock who receives cash in lieu of a fractional share of our common stock in the Spin-Off will recognize capital gain or loss measured by the difference between the tax basis of the fractional share deemed to be received, as determined above, and the amount of cash received.

Although the IRS Ruling generally is binding on the IRS, the IRS Ruling is based on certain facts and assumptions, and certain representations and undertakings, from Ensign and us that certain necessary conditions to obtain tax-free treatment under the Code have been satisfied. Furthermore, as a result of the IRS’s general ruling policy with respect to distributions under Section 355 of the Code, the IRS will not rule on whether a distribution satisfies certain critical requirements necessary to obtain tax-free treatment under the Code. Specifically, the IRS will not rule that a distribution was effected for a valid business purpose, that a distribution does not constitute a device for the distribution of earnings and profits, or that a distribution is not part of a plan described in Section 355(e) of the Code (as discussed below). Instead, the IRS Ruling is based on representations made to the IRS by Ensign that these requirements have been established. In connection with obtaining the ruling, Ensign expects to obtain the Tax Opinion, which is expected to include a conclusion that the Spin-Off is being effected for a valid business purpose, that the Spin-Off does not constitute a device for the distribution of earnings and profits, and that the Spin-Off is not part of a plan described in Section 355(e) of the Code (as discussed below). The Tax Opinion will be expressed as of the date issued and will not cover subsequent periods,

 

48


Table of Contents

and the Tax Opinion will rely on the IRS Ruling. As a result, the Tax Opinion is not expected to be issued until after the date of this information statement. An opinion of counsel represents counsel’s best legal judgment based on current law and is not binding on the IRS or any court. We cannot assure you that the IRS will agree with the conclusions expected to be set forth in the Tax Opinion, and it is possible that the IRS or another tax authority could adopt a position contrary to one or all of those conclusions and that a court could sustain that contrary position. If any of the facts, representations, assumptions, or undertakings described or made in connection with the IRS Ruling or the Tax Opinion are not correct, are incomplete or have been violated, the IRS Ruling could be revoked retroactively or modified by the IRS, and our ability to rely on the Tax Opinion could be jeopardized. We are not aware of any facts or circumstances, however, that would cause these facts, representations, or assumptions to be untrue or incomplete, or that would cause any of these undertakings to fail to be complied with, in any material respect.

If, notwithstanding the conclusions included in the IRS Ruling and that we expect to be included in the Tax Opinion, it is ultimately determined that the Spin-Off does not qualify as tax-free under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code for U.S. federal income tax purposes, then Ensign would recognize gain in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of our common stock distributed to Ensign stockholders on the distribution date over Ensign’s tax basis in such shares. In addition, each Ensign stockholder that receives shares of our common stock in the Spin-Off would be treated as receiving a distribution in an amount equal to the fair market value of our common stock that was distributed to the stockholder, which would generally be taxed as a dividend to the extent of the stockholder’s pro rata share of Ensign’s current and accumulated earnings and profits, including Ensign’s taxable gain, if any, on the Spin-Off, then treated as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of the stockholder’s basis in the Ensign stock and thereafter treated as capital gain from the sale or exchange of Ensign stock.

Even if the Spin-Off otherwise qualifies for tax-free treatment under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code, the Spin-Off may result in corporate level taxable gain to Ensign under Section 355(e) of the Code if 50% or more, by vote or value, of our stock or Ensign stock is treated as acquired or issued as part of a plan or series of related transactions that includes the Spin-Off. If an acquisition or issuance of our stock or Ensign stock triggers the application of Section 355(e) of the Code, Ensign would recognize taxable gain as described above, but the distribution would generally be tax-free to each Ensign stockholder, as described above.

U.S. Treasury regulations require certain U.S. Holders who are “significant distributees” and who receive common stock in the Spin-Off to attach to their U.S. federal income tax returns for the year in which the Spin-Off occurs a statement setting forth certain information with respect to the transaction. Ensign will provide stockholders who receive our common stock in the Spin-Off with the information necessary to comply with such requirement. Holders are urged to consult their tax advisors to determine whether they are significant distributees required to provide the foregoing statement.

Cash in Lieu of Fractional Shares

No fractional shares of our common stock will be distributed to Ensign stockholders in connection with the Spin-Off. All such fractional shares resulting from the Spin-Off will be aggregated and sold by the transfer agent, and the proceeds, if any, less any brokerage commissions or other fees, will be distributed to Ensign stockholders in accordance with their fractional interest in the aggregate number of shares sold. A holder that receives cash in lieu of a fractional share of our common stock as a part of the Spin-Off will generally recognize capital gain or loss measured by the difference between the cash received for such fractional share and the holder’s tax basis in the fractional share determined as described above. Any such capital gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if an Ensign stockholder held such stock for more than one year at the time of the Spin-Off. Long-term capital gains generally are subject to preferential rates of U.S. federal income tax for certain non-corporate U.S. holders (including individuals). The deductibility of capital losses is subject to significant limitations.

 

49


Table of Contents

Conditions to the Spin-Off

We expect that the Spin-Off will be effective on the distribution date, provided that the following conditions have been satisfied or waived by the board of directors of Ensign:

 

    the final approval by the board of directors of Ensign of the Spin-Off and all related transactions (and such approval not having been withdrawn) and determination of the record date;

 

    the SEC declaring effective our registration statement on Form 10 under the Exchange Act, and no stop order relating to the registration statement being in effect;

 

    the mailing by Ensign of this information statement to record holders of Ensign common stock as of the record date;

 

    the IRS Ruling, which provides among other things, that the Spin-Off will qualify as a tax-free transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code, shall not have been revoked or modified in any material respect;

 

    the receipt by Ensign of the Tax Opinion, in form and substance satisfactory to Ensign in its sole and absolute discretion, to the effect that certain requirements for tax-free treatment, on which the IRS will not rule, will be satisfied;

 

    the receipt by CareTrust of an opinion, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to CareTrust, to the effect that, commencing with CareTrust’s taxable year ending on December 31, 2014, CareTrust has been organized in conformity with the requirements for qualification as a REIT under the Code, and its proposed method of operation will enable it to meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT;

 

    the receipt by CareTrust and Ensign of an opinion, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to CareTrust, substantially to the effect that the Master Leases will be respected as “true leases” for U.S. federal income tax purposes with respect to certain facilities;

 

    the approval of the listing of our common stock on NASDAQ, subject to official notice of issuance;

 

    the completion by CareTrust of the financing transactions described in this information statement and contemplated to occur on or prior to the distribution date, including our Operating Partnership’s issuance of notes, our Operating Partnership’s entry into a revolving credit facility and the incurrence of additional mortgage indebtedness;

 

    the transfer by CareTrust to Ensign of a portion of the proceeds from our Operating Partnership’s issuance of notes, and Ensign’s use of a portion of such transferred proceeds to repay certain indebtedness and trade payables;

 

    the absence of any order, injunction or decree issued by any court of competent jurisdiction or other legal restraint or prohibition preventing consummation of the Spin-Off or any of the transactions related thereto, including the transfers of assets and liabilities contemplated by the Separation and Distribution Agreement;

 

    the absence of any events or developments having occurred prior to the Spin-Off that, in the judgment of the board of directors of Ensign, would result in the Spin-Off having a material adverse effect on Ensign or its stockholders;

 

50


Table of Contents
    the adoption by CareTrust of its amended and restated charter and bylaws;

 

    the execution by the parties of the Separation and Distribution Agreement and all other ancillary agreements relating to the Spin-Off, including the Master Leases; and

 

    Ensign’s receipt of applicable regulatory approvals relating to the Spin-Off.

The fulfillment of the above conditions will not create any obligation on behalf of Ensign to effect the Spin-Off. Until the Spin-Off has occurred, Ensign has the right to terminate the Spin-Off, even if all the conditions have been satisfied, if the board of directors of Ensign determines that the Spin-Off is not in the best interests of Ensign and its stockholders or that market conditions or other circumstances are such that the separation of CareTrust and Ensign is no longer advisable at that time.

Regulatory Approvals

We must complete the necessary registration under U.S. federal securities laws of our common stock, as well as satisfy the applicable NASDAQ listing requirements for such shares. See “—Conditions to the Spin-Off.”

No Appraisal Rights

Ensign stockholders will not have any appraisal rights in connection with the Spin-Off.

Accounting Treatment

At the time of the Spin-Off, the balance sheet of CareTrust will include substantially all of the assets and liabilities associated with Ensign’s real estate business, as well as the assets and liabilities of the three independent living facilities that will be owned and operated by CareTrust. The assets and liabilities of CareTrust will be recorded at their respective historical carrying values at the time of the Spin-Off in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 505-60, “Spinoffs and Reverse Spinoffs.”

Financial Advisors

Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC are providing financial advice in connection with the Spin-Off. Each was retained in connection with the transaction because of the firm’s familiarity with Ensign’s assets and operations, and the firm’s qualifications and reputation.

Reasons for Furnishing this Information Statement

We are furnishing this information statement solely to provide information to Ensign stockholders who will receive shares of our common stock in the Spin-Off. You should not construe this information statement as an inducement or encouragement to buy, hold or sell any of our securities or any securities of Ensign. We believe that the information contained in this information statement is accurate as of the date set forth on the cover. Changes to the information contained in this information statement may occur after that date, and neither we nor Ensign undertake any obligation to update the information except in the normal course of Ensign’s business and our public disclosure obligations and practices.

DIVIDEND POLICY

We intend to elect to be taxed and intend to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ending December 31, 2014. Commencing with our taxable year ending December 31, 2014, we expect to pay dividends in cash in an amount equal to approximately 80% of our FAD for each quarterly period, but in no event will the annual dividend be less than 90% of our REIT taxable income on an annual basis, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains. U.S. federal income tax law generally requires that a REIT distribute annually at least 90% of its REIT

 

51


Table of Contents

taxable income, without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains, and that it pay regular corporate rates to the extent that it annually distributes less than 100% of its taxable income. For purposes of determining our cash dividends, our FAD will be calculated by starting with the NAREIT definition of funds from operations, which is net income (computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property, plus real estate depreciation. The NAREIT definition will then be adjusted to exclude non-cash expenses such as stock-based compensation expense and amortization of deferred financing costs, resulting in our FAD.

Initially, cash available for distribution to our stockholders will be derived solely from the rental payments under the Master Leases and the income, if any, from operations of our three independent living facilities. All dividends will be made by us at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on the financial position, results of operations, cash flows, capital requirements, debt covenants (which are expected to include limits on dividends by us), applicable law and other factors as our board of directors deems relevant. Our board of directors has not yet determined when any dividends or distributions will be declared or paid. We cannot guarantee, and there can be no assurance, that we will declare or pay any dividends or distributions.

We currently intend to pay quarterly dividends in cash. For purposes of satisfying the minimum distribution requirement to qualify for and maintain REIT status, our taxable income will be calculated without reference to our cash flow. Consequently, under certain circumstances, we may not have available cash to pay our required distributions and a portion of our distributions may consist of our stock or our debt instruments. In either event, a stockholder of ours will be required to report dividend income as a result of such distributions even though we distributed no cash or only nominal amounts of cash to such stockholder. The IRS has issued private letter rulings to other REITs treating certain distributions that are paid partly in cash and partly in stock as taxable dividends that would satisfy the REIT annual distribution requirement and qualify for the dividends paid deduction for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Those rulings may be relied upon only by taxpayers to whom they were issued, but we could request a similar ruling from the IRS. We cannot rely on the IRS Ruling with respect to the payment of dividends other than the Purging Distribution. Accordingly, it is unclear whether and to what extent we will be able to make taxable dividends (other than the Purging Distribution) payable in-kind. For more information, see “U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Taxation of REITs in General—Annual Distribution Requirements.” We currently believe that we will have sufficient available cash to pay our required distribution for 2014 in cash, but there can be no assurance that this will be the case.

Our dividend policy enables us to review from time to time alternative funding sources to pay our required distributions. We presently anticipate that any future property acquisitions will be financed through the debt we expect to incur in connection with the Spin-Off, other debt financing or the issuance of equity securities. To the extent those funding sources are insufficient to meet our cash needs, or the cost of such financing exceeds the cash flow generated by the acquired properties for any period, cash available for distribution could be reduced. To the extent that our cash available for distribution is less than the amount required to be distributed under the REIT provisions of the Code, we may consider various funding sources to cover any such shortfall, including borrowing under available debt facilities, selling certain of our assets or using a portion of the net proceeds we receive in future offerings. However, the sale of any properties acquired from Ensign in connection with the Spin-Off within the ten-year period following the Spin-Off may subject us to adverse consequences. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Taxation as a REIT.”

We anticipate that our dividends will generally be taxable as ordinary income to our stockholders, although a portion of the dividends may be designated by us as qualified dividend income or capital gain or may constitute a return of capital. We will furnish annually to each of our stockholders a statement setting forth dividends paid during the preceding year and their characterization as ordinary income, return of capital, qualified dividend income or capital gain. For a more complete discussion of the U.S. federal income tax treatment of distributions to our stockholders, see “U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Taxation of Stockholders—Taxation of Taxable U.S. Stockholders.”

 

52


Table of Contents

FINANCING

The following summary sets forth information based on our current expectations about the financing arrangements anticipated to be entered into prior to the Spin-Off. However, we have not yet entered into any commitments with respect to such financing arrangements, and, accordingly, the terms of such financing arrangements have not yet been determined, remain under discussion and are subject to change, including as a result of market conditions.

Senior Unsecured Notes Issuance

Prior to the Spin-Off, we anticipate that our Operating Partnership will issue up to $260.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes with a term of seven or eight years. In connection with the Spin-Off, CareTrust will transfer to Ensign approximately $220.8 million of proceeds from the issuance of the notes in order for Ensign to repay certain indebtedness, pay trade payables and, subject to the approval of Ensign’s board of directors, pay up to eight regular quarterly dividends. The amount of proceeds to be transferred to Ensign was determined based on the desired capitalization of Ensign and CareTrust after the Spin-Off. It was not determined based on any appraisal or valuation of the CareTrust Properties. We will use a portion of the proceeds from the notes issuance to pay the Purging Distribution, which we expect to make by December 31, 2014. The remaining proceeds will be available for working capital purposes, to fund acquisitions and for general corporate purposes.

We anticipate that the notes will be guaranteed, jointly and severally, by us, CareTrust GP, LLC and by certain of our Operating Partnership’s subsidiaries. The notes are expected to have terms customary for high yield senior notes of this type, including: customary covenants relating to debt incurrence, maintenance of unencumbered assets, restricted payments, asset sales, transactions with affiliates and merger or sale of all or substantially all of CareTrust’s assets; and customary redemption and repurchase provisions and events of default.

The foregoing summarizes some of the currently expected terms of our notes. However, the foregoing summary does not purport to be complete, and the terms of the notes have not yet been finalized. There may be changes to the expected principal amount and terms of the notes, some of which may be material. Nothing in this summary or otherwise herein shall constitute or be deemed to constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy the notes.

Revolving Credit Facility

We anticipate that our Operating Partnership will enter into a credit agreement providing for a revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to $150.0 million to be provided by a syndicate of banks and other financial institutions. We expect to use borrowings under the revolving credit facility after the Spin-Off for working capital purposes, to fund acquisitions and for general corporate purposes.

We anticipate that, subject to customary conditions, including obtaining commitments and pro forma compliance with the financial maintenance covenants, the Operating Partnership will be able to obtain incremental revolving or term loans under the revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount not to exceed $75.0 million. We do not anticipate there being any commitments to provide such incremental loans upon entering into the revolving credit facility or at the time of the Spin-Off.

We anticipate the interest rates per annum applicable to loans under the revolving credit facility to be, at the Operating Partnership’s option, equal to either a base rate plus a margin ranging from 1.00% to 1.50% per annum or LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 2.00% to 2.50% per annum, based on the debt to asset value ratio of the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries. In addition, we expect that the Operating Partnership will pay a commitment fee on the unused portion of the commitments under the revolving credit facility that will vary depending on the amount of such unused commitments, and is expected to range from 0.35% to 0.50% per annum.

We anticipate that the revolving credit facility will not be subject to interim amortization. We expect that the Operating Partnership will not be required to repay any loans under the revolving credit facility prior to maturity, other than to the extent the outstanding borrowings exceed the outstanding commitments under the

 

53


Table of Contents

revolving credit facility or to the extent the outstanding borrowings exceed the sum of the borrowing base values attributable to the eligible properties we mortgage as security under the revolving credit facility. We expect that the Operating Partnership will be permitted to prepay all or any portion of the loans under the revolving credit facility prior to maturity without premium or penalty, subject to reimbursement of any LIBOR breakage costs of the lenders.

We anticipate that the revolving credit facility will be guaranteed, jointly and severally, by us and by certain of our Operating Partnership’s wholly owned subsidiaries. The revolving credit facility is expected to contain customary covenants that, among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, the ability of the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries to grant liens on their assets, incur indebtedness, sell assets, make investments, engage in acquisitions, mergers or consolidations and pay certain dividends and other restricted payments. We also anticipate that the revolving credit facility will require us to comply with financial maintenance covenants to be tested quarterly, consisting of a maximum debt to asset value ratio, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and minimum net worth. We anticipate that the revolving credit facility will also contain certain customary events of default. We anticipate that CareTrust will be required to maintain its status as a REIT on and after the effective date of its election to be treated as a REIT.

The revolving credit facility is expected to be secured by certain of our properties, and the amount available to be drawn under the revolving credit facility will be based on the borrowing base values attributed to such mortgaged properties. As of the effective date of the revolving credit facility, we expect the amount available to be drawn thereunder to be approximately $84 million. The revolving credit facility will also be secured by certain personal property of our subsidiaries that have provided mortgages, partnership interests in the Operating Partnership that we own and equity interests in our subsidiaries that guarantee the revolving credit facility.

The foregoing summarizes some of the currently expected terms of our revolving credit facility. However, the foregoing summary does not purport to be complete, and the terms of the revolving credit facility have not yet been finalized. There may be changes to the expected size and other terms of the revolving credit facility, some of which may be material.

Additional Mortgage Indebtedness

Ten of our properties will be subject to existing mortgage indebtedness to General Electric Capital Corporation (“GECC”), which we will assume in connection with the Spin-Off. The outstanding amount of this existing mortgage indebtedness was approximately $48.5 million as of March 31, 2014. Prior to the Spin-Off, we intend to increase the amount of mortgage indebtedness on these same 10 properties with an additional advance from GECC in an amount of approximately $50.5 million. The additional advance is expected to bear interest at a floating rate equal to the 90 day LIBOR plus 3.35%, reset monthly and subject to a LIBOR floor of 0.50%, with monthly principal and interest payments based on a 25 year amortization. The existing mortgage indebtedness will continue to bear interest at the existing interest rates until June 29, 2016, and then will convert to the floating rate described above. The GECC loan, as modified, is expected to have a term of 36 months from the date of the new advance, plus two 12-month extension options, the exercise of which will be conditioned, in each case, on the absence of any then-existing default and the payment of an extension fee equal to 0.25% of the then-outstanding principal balance of the GECC loan. The GECC loan will be prepayable without penalty, in whole or in part, after January 31, 2016.

We anticipate that the GECC mortgage indebtedness will be guaranteed, jointly and severally, by us and by our Operating Partnership, and that the existing guaranty by Ensign will be released in connection with the Spin-Off. The additional mortgage indebtedness is expected to contain customary affirmative and negative covenants, as well as customary events of default. We also anticipate that the mortgage indebtedness will require us to comply with specified financial maintenance covenants.

The foregoing summarizes some of the currently expected terms of the additional mortgage indebtedness. However, the foregoing summary does not purport to be complete, and the terms of the additional mortgage indebtedness have not yet been finalized. There may be changes to the expected principal amount and terms of the indebtedness, some of which may be material.

 

54


Table of Contents

CAPITALIZATION

The following table sets forth our cash and cash equivalents and capitalization as of March 31, 2014, on a historical basis and on a pro forma basis to give effect to the Spin-Off and the transactions related thereto, including the financing transactions described in this information statement and contemplated to occur on or prior to the distribution date, as if they occurred on March 31, 2014. Explanation of the pro forma adjustments made to Ensign Properties’ combined historical financial statements can be found under “CareTrust’s Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements.” The following table should be reviewed in conjunction with “CareTrust’s Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Ensign Properties’ combined historical financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this information statement.

 

     Historical
March 31, 2014
     Pro Forma
March 31, 2014
 
     (in thousands)  

Cash and cash equivalents

    $ 927        $ 84,109(1)   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Long-term debt, including amounts due within one year(2):

     

Senior secured term loan

   $ 64,688       $   

Senior secured revolving credit facility

     78,700           

Senior unsecured notes payable

             260,000   

Mortgage notes payable, net of discount

     114,100         99,000   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total debt

     257,488         359,000   

Total equity

     172,724         148,902   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total capitalization

    $ 430,212        $ 507,902   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) Does not reflect reduction to cash attributable to the payment of the cash portion of the Purging Distribution, which is expected to be made by December 31, 2014. The total amount of Ensign’s E&P immediately prior to the Spin-Off is expected to be between $350.0 million and $385.0 million. The actual amount of Ensign’s E&P allocated to CareTrust will depend on the final determination of Ensign’s E&P and the relative trading value of CareTrust common stock and Ensign common stock following the Spin-Off. The Purging Distribution will be paid to CareTrust stockholders in a combination of cash and shares of CareTrust common stock with an aggregate value equal to Ensign’s E&P allocated to CareTrust. The portion that will be paid in cash will be determined by CareTrust at the time the dividend is declared, but will be at least 20% and not more than 25% of the total amount paid to all stockholders.
(2) Prior to the Spin-Off, we anticipate that our Operating Partnership will issue up to $260.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes, and that a portion of the proceeds from such issuance will be transferred to Ensign to repay $64.7 million of outstanding borrowings under the term loan portion of Ensign’s existing senior secured credit facility, $78.7 million of outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility portion of Ensign’s existing senior secured credit facility, and $66.2 million of mortgage notes payable. We also anticipate that our Operating Partnership will enter into a credit agreement providing for a revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to $150.0 million. Prior to the Spin-Off, we intend to increase the amount of mortgage indebtedness on 10 of our properties by approximately $50.5 million. However, we have not yet entered into any commitments with respect to such financing arrangements, and, accordingly, the terms of such financing arrangements have not yet been determined, remain under discussion and are subject to change, including as a result of market conditions. See “Financing.”

 

55


Table of Contents

CARETRUST’S UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following unaudited pro forma combined financial statements present our unaudited pro forma combined income statements for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and for the year ended December 31, 2013, and our unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet as of March 31, 2014, which have been derived from Ensign Properties’ combined historical financial statements included elsewhere in this information statement.

The following unaudited pro forma combined financial statements give effect to the Spin-Off and the related transactions, including: (i) additional rental income associated with new Master Leases between CareTrust and Ensign for the properties that were previously leased under intercompany lease agreements; (ii) the distribution of approximately 22.2 million shares of CareTrust common stock by Ensign to Ensign stockholders; (iii) the anticipated issuance by our Operating Partnership of up to $260.0 million aggregate principal amount of unsecured notes, and the anticipated interest expense related thereto; (iv) the transfer to Ensign of approximately $220.8 million of proceeds from the issuance of the notes in order for Ensign to repay certain indebtedness, pay trade payables and, subject to the approval of Ensign’s board of directors, pay up to eight regular quarterly dividends; (v) the incurrence of an additional $50.5 million of mortgage indebtedness, and the anticipated interest expense related thereto; and (vi) the elimination of income tax provisions in conjunction with the election of REIT status. The unaudited pro forma combined income statements for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013 assume the Spin-Off and the related transactions occurred on January 1, 2013. The unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet assumes the Spin-Off and the related transactions occurred on March 31, 2014. The pro forma adjustments are based on currently available information and assumptions we believe are reasonable, factually supportable, directly attributable to our separation from Ensign, and for purposes of the income statement, are expected to have a continuing impact on us.

The historical financial data has been adjusted to give pro forma effect to events that are directly attributable to the transactions described above, have an ongoing effect on our statement of operations and are factually supportable. Our unaudited pro forma combined financial statements and explanatory notes present how our financial statements may have appeared had our capital structure reflected the above transactions as of the dates noted above.

The pro forma adjustments do not reflect the payment of the Purging Distribution, which is expected to be made by December 31, 2014. The total amount of Ensign’s E&P immediately prior to the Spin-Off is expected to be between $350.0 million and $385.0 million. The actual amount of Ensign’s E&P allocated to CareTrust will depend on the final determination of Ensign’s E&P and the relative trading value of CareTrust common stock and Ensign common stock following the Spin-Off. The Purging Distribution will be paid to CareTrust stockholders in a combination of cash and shares of CareTrust common stock with an aggregate value equal to Ensign’s E&P allocated to CareTrust. The portion that will be paid in cash will be determined by CareTrust at the time the dividend is declared, but will be at least 20% and not more than 25% of the total amount distributed to all stockholders.

The pro forma financial results assume that 100% of taxable income has been distributed and that all relevant REIT qualifying tests, as dictated by the Code and IRS rules and interpretations, were met for the entire year.

Our unaudited pro forma combined financial statements were prepared in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation S-X, using the assumptions set forth in the notes to our unaudited pro forma combined financial statements. The following unaudited pro forma combined financial statements are presented for illustrative purposes only and do not purport to reflect the results we may achieve in future periods or the historical results that would have been obtained had the above transactions been completed on January 1, 2013 or as of March 31, 2014, as the case may be. Our unaudited pro forma combined financial statements also do not give effect to the potential impact of current financial conditions, any anticipated synergies, operating efficiencies or cost savings that may result from the transactions described above.

Our unaudited pro forma combined financial statements are derived from and should be read in conjunction with Ensign Properties’ combined historical financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this information statement.

 

56


Table of Contents

CARETRUST REIT, INC.

PRO FORMA COMBINED BALANCE SHEET

(Unaudited)

 

     March 31, 2014  
       Historical       Pro Forma
  Adjustments  
        Note          Pro Forma
  Combined  
 
     (in thousands)  

Assets:

         

Real estate investments, net of accumulated depreciation of $104,171 as of March 31, 2014

   $ 431,484      $ (11,316     (1)       $ 420,168   

Cash and cash equivalents

     927        303,934        (2)      
       (220,752     (3)         84,109   

Accounts receivable

     13             13   

Prepaid expenses and other assets

     1,069        (285     (3)         784   

Deferred tax assets

     1,184        (1,184     (6)         —     

Deferred financing costs, net

     2,626        6,530        (2)      
       (2,364     (5)         6,792   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 437,303      $ 74,563         $ 511,866   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Liabilities and Invested Equity:

         

Senior unsecured notes payable

   $ —        $ 260,000        (2)       $ 260,000   

Mortgage notes payable

     114,100        (66,234     (3)      
       50,464        (2)      
       670        (7)         99,000   

Senior secured term loan

     64,688        (64,688     (3)         —     

Senior secured revolving credit facility

     78,700        (78,700     (3)         —     

Fair value of interest rate swap

     1,631        (1,631     (3)         —     

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

     4,276        (312     (3)         3,964   

Deferred tax liabilities

     1,184        (1,184     (6)         —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     264,579        98,385           362,964   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

         

Equity

         

Invested capital

     174,355        (11,316     (1)      
       (11,103     (3)      
       (2,364     (5)      
       (670     (7)         148,902   

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

     (1,631     1,631        (4)         —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total equity

     172,724        (23,822        148,902   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

   $ 437,303      $ 74,563         $ 511,866   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma combined financial statements.

 

57


Table of Contents

CARETRUST REIT, INC.

PRO FORMA COMBINED INCOME STATEMENT

(Unaudited)

 

     Three Months Ended March 31, 2014  
       Historical       Pro Forma
  Adjustments  
        Note          Pro Forma
  Combined  
 
    

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

Revenues:

         

Rental income from Parent

   $ 11,023      $ 2,977              (8)             $ 14,000   

Tenant reimbursement from Parent

     1,262             1,262   

Other revenue

     587             587   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total revenue

     12,872        2,977           15,849   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Expenses:

         

Depreciation and amortization

     6,199        (952           (9)               5,247   

Interest expense

     3,152        2,464              (10)               5,616   

Amortization of deferred financing costs

     175        123              (11)               298   

Property taxes

     1,262             1,262   

Acquisition costs

     —               —     

Operating expenses

     543             543   

General and administrative

     1,904             1,904   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total expenses

     13,235        1,635           14,870   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

(Loss) income before provision for income taxes

     (363     1,342           979   

Provision for income taxes

     37        (37           (12)                 
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

   $ (400   $ 1,379         $ 979   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share

          $ 0.04   
         

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per share

          $ 0.04   
         

 

 

 

Weighted average number of shares outstanding:

         

Basic

       22,168              (13)               22,168   
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Diluted

       22,227              (13)               22,227   
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma combined financial statements.

 

58


Table of Contents

CARETRUST REIT, INC.

PRO FORMA COMBINED INCOME STATEMENT

(Unaudited)

 

     Year Ended December 31, 2013  
       Historical       Pro Forma
  Adjustments  
        Note          Pro Forma
  Combined  
 
    

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

Revenues:

         

Rental income from Parent

   $ 41,242      $ 12,459              (8)             $ 53,701   

Tenant reimbursement from Parent

     5,168             5,168   

Other revenue

     2,386             2,386   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total revenue

     48,796        12,459           61,255   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Expenses:

         

Depreciation and amortization

     23,418        (3,951           (9)               19,467   

Interest expense

     11,948        10,629              (10)               22,577   

Amortization of deferred financing costs

     699        492              (11)               1,191   

Property taxes

     5,168             5,168   

Acquisition costs

     255             255   

Operating expenses

     2,138             2,138   

General and administrative

     5,442             5,442   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total expenses

     49,068        7,170           56,238   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

(Loss) income before provision for income taxes

     (272     5,289           5,017   

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

     123        (123           (12)                 
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

   $ (395   $ 5,412         $ 5,017   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share

          $ 0.23   
         

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per share

          $ 0.23   
         

 

 

 

Weighted average number of shares outstanding:

         

Basic

       21,900              (13)               21,900   
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Diluted

       21,955              (13)               21,955   
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma combined financial statements.

 

59


Table of Contents

CARETRUST REIT, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in thousands)

Pro Forma Adjustments—Balance Sheet

 

(1) Reflects certain land, equipment, furniture and fixtures that will not be transferred to CareTrust.

 

(2) Reflects the issuance of senior unsecured notes and additional mortgage indebtedness and the issuance costs associated with the notes and mortgage indebtedness and a new $150,000 revolving credit facility:

 

Issuance of senior unsecured notes

   $ 260,000   

Issuance of additional mortgage indebtedness

     50,464   

Issuance costs of indebtedness and the $150,000 revolving credit facility

     (6,530
  

 

 

 

Net cash proceeds

   $ 303,934   
  

 

 

 

A  18% change in the annual interest rate would change our interest expense by approximately $400 annually.

 

(3) Reflects the repayment of $210,000 of indebtedness that is included on the balance sheet of the carved-out financial statements of Ensign Properties and the related $3,712 of prepayment penalties and the swap settlement fee associated with the repayment as well as the elimination of related accounts and accrued charges.

 

Mortgage notes payable

   $ 66,234   

Senior secured term loan

     64,688   

Senior secured revolving credit facility

     78,700   

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     (285

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

     312   

Invested capital

     11,103   
  

 

 

 

Net cash outflow

   $ 220,752   
  

 

 

 

The invested capital adjustment includes the following:

 

Funds transferred to Ensign in order for Ensign to pay trade payables and up to eight quarterly dividends

   $ 7,391   

Prepayment penalties associated with the repayment of debt

     2,081   

Cash settlement of the interest rate swap

     1,631   
  

 

 

 
   $ 11,103   
  

 

 

 

 

(4) Reflects the non-cash write-off of certain accounts resulting from the cash settlement of the interest rate swap.

 

(5) Reflects the non-cash write-off of deferred financing costs, net associated with the prepayment of certain indebtedness.

 

(6) Reflects the elimination of deferred tax assets and liabilities due to our election to be taxed as a REIT.

 

(7) Reflects the elimination of the debt discount.

 

60


Table of Contents

CARETRUST REIT, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in thousands)

Pro Forma Adjustments—Income Statement

 

         Three Months
Ended
March 31,
2014
    Year Ended
December 31,

2013
 
(8)   Reflects additional rental income from subsidiaries of Ensign due to the new Master Leases for properties of Ensign Properties that were previously leased under intercompany lease agreements.     
(9)   Represents the adjustment to depreciation expense for certain equipment, furniture and fixtures that will not be transferred to CareTrust.     
(10)   Represents the adjustments to interest expense due to the following:     
  Senior unsecured notes    $ 4,062      $ 16,250   
  Additional mortgage debt      486        1,943   
  Unused revolving credit facility fee      186        750  
  Repayment of certain indebtednesses      (2,270     (8,314
    

 

 

   

 

 

 
  Net increase to interest expense    $ 2,464      $ 10,629   
    

 

 

   

 

 

 
(11)   Represents the adjustments to amortization of deferred financing costs due to the following:     
 

Issuance costs of debt and revolving credit facility

   $ 269      $ 1,076   
  Repayment of certain indebtednesses      (146     (584
    

 

 

   

 

 

 
  Net increase to amortization of deferred financing costs    $ 123      $ 492   
    

 

 

   

 

 

 
(12)   Reflects the elimination of the provision (benefit) for income taxes due to election to be taxed as a REIT.     
(13)   Reflects the distribution of CareTrust shares by Ensign to Ensign’s stockholders based on a distribution ratio of one for one. The pro forma diluted weighted average shares outstanding take into account the dilutive effect of restricted stock awards.     

 

61


Table of Contents

ENSIGN’S UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements present Ensign’s unaudited pro forma consolidated income statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 and the three months ended March 31, 2014, and Ensign’s unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2014, which have been derived from Ensign’s consolidated historical financial statements that are not included in this information statement.

The following unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements give effect to the Spin-Off and the related transactions, including: (i) the transfer to us of Ensign’s assets and liabilities that are specifically identifiable or otherwise allocable to us; (ii) the elimination of Ensign’s equity interest in us; and (iii) the removal of certain non-recurring transaction expenses directly related to the Spin-Off. The unaudited pro forma consolidated income statements for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013 assume the Spin-Off and the related transactions occurred on January 1, 2013. The unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet assumes the Spin-Off and the related transactions occurred on March 31, 2014. The pro forma adjustments are based on currently available information and assumptions we believe are reasonable, factually supportable, directly attributable to our separation from Ensign, and for purposes of the income statement, are expected to have a continuing impact on Ensign.

The historical financial data has been adjusted to give pro forma effect to events that are directly attributable to the transactions described above, have an ongoing effect on Ensign’s statement of operations and are factually supportable. Ensign’s unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements and explanatory notes present how Ensign’s financial statements may have appeared had its capital structure reflected the above transactions as of the dates noted above.

Ensign’s unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation S-X, using the assumptions set forth in the notes to the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements. The following unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements are presented for illustrative purposes only and do not purport to reflect the results Ensign may achieve in future periods or the historical results that would have been obtained had the above transactions been completed on January 1, 2013 or as of March 31, 2014, as the case may be. Ensign’s unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements also do not give effect to the potential impact of current financial conditions, any anticipated synergies, operating efficiencies or cost savings that may result from the transactions described above.

Ensign’s unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements are derived from and should be read in conjunction with Ensign’s historical financial statements and accompanying notes that are incorporated by reference into this information statement.

 

62


Table of Contents

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

 

     March 31, 2014  
     Historical     Pro Forma
Adjustments
    Note    Pro Forma
Consolidated
 
     (in thousands)  

Assets:

         

Current assets:

         

Cash and cash equivalents

    $ 57,469      $ (927   (1)   
       7,391      (4)    $ 63,933   

Accounts receivable

     120,569        (13   (1)      120,556   

Investments – current

     4,521             4,521   

Prepaid income taxes

     2,665             2,665   

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     9,023        (1,069   (1)      7,954   

Deferred tax assets – current

     9,221        (1,173   (1)      8,048   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total current assets

     203,468        4,209           207,677   

Property and equipment, net

     496,618        (420,168   (1)      76,450   

Insurance subsidiary deposits and investment

     17,728             17,728   

Escrow deposits

     3,252             3,252   

Deferred tax asset

     4,380        (10   (1)      4,370   

Restricted and other assets

     8,676        (2,626   (1)   
       825      (5)      6,875   

Intangible assets, net

     5,650             5,650   

Goodwill

     23,966             23,966   

Other indefinite-lived intangibles

     7,740             7,740   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total assets

    $ 771,478       $ (417,770       $ 353,708   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Liabilities and Equity:

         

Current liabilities

         

Accounts payable

    $ 26,722      $ (2,004   (1)    $ 24,718   

Accrued wages and related liabilities

     40,744        (247   (1)      40,497   

Accrued self-insurance liabilities – current

     13,335             13,335   

Other accrued liabilities

     23,584        (2,036   (1)      21,548   

Current maturities of long-term debt

     7,469        (7,469   (1)      —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

     111,854        (11,756        100,098   

Long-term debt – less current maturities

     250,019        (250,019   (1)      —     

Accrued self insurance liabilities – less current portion

     32,944             32,944   

Fair value of interest rate swap

     1,631        (1,631   (1)      —     

Deferred rent and other long-term liabilities

     3,222        (1,174   (1)      2,048   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     399,670        (264,580        135,090   

Equity:

         

Common stock

     22             22   

Additional paid-in capital

     104,229             104,229   

Retained earnings

     269,459        (154,183   (2)      115,276   

Treasury stock

     (1,585          (1,585

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

     (993     993      (3)      —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total Ensign stockholders’ equity

     371,132        (153,190        217,942   

Noncontrolling interests

     676             676   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total equity

     371,808        (153,190        218,618   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

    $ 771,478       $ (417,770       $ 353,708   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements.

 

63


Table of Contents

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA

CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT

 

     Three Months Ended March 31, 2014  
         Historical         Pro Forma
    Adjustments    
    Note    Pro Forma
    Consolidated    
 
     (in thousands, except per share amounts)  

Revenue

    $ 239,653       $ (587   (11)     $ 239,066   

Expense:

         

Cost of services

     189,738        (543   (11)      189,195   

Facility rent – cost of services

     3,549        14,000      (6)      17,549   

General and administrative expense

     13,157        (1,590   (7)      11,567   

Depreciation and amortization

     8,862        (5,247   (8)      3,615   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total Expenses

     215,306        6,620           221,926   

Income from operations

     24,347        (7,207        17,140   

Other income (expense):

         

Interest expense

     (3,363     3,098      (9)      (265

Interest income

     159             159   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Other expense, net

     (3,204 )       3,098           (106
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Income from operations before provision for income taxes

     21,143        (4,109        17,034   

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

     8,102        (1,635   (10)      6,467   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Net income from continuing operations

     13,041        (2,474        10,567   

Less: net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

     (485          (485
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Net income from continuing operations attributable to Ensign

    $ 13,526       $ (2,474       $ 11,052   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Basic earnings from continuing operations attributable to Ensign per share:

    $ 0.61            $ 0.50   
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

Diluted earnings from continuing operations attributable to Ensign per share:

    $ 0.60            $ 0.49   
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

Weighted average number of shares outstanding:

         

Basic

     22,168             22,168   
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

Diluted

     22,582             22,582   
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements.

 

64


Table of Contents

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA

CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT

 

     Year Ended December 31, 2013  
         Historical         Pro Forma
    Adjustments    
    Note    Pro Forma
    Consolidated    
 
     (in thousands, except per share amounts)  

Revenue

    $ 904,556       $ (2,386   (11)     $ 902,170   

Expense:

         

Cost of services

     725,989        (2,138   (11)      723,851   

U.S. Government inquiry settlement

     33,000             33,000   

Facility rent – cost of services

     13,613        53,701      (6)      67,314   

General and administrative expense

     40,103        (4,049   (7)      36,054   

Depreciation and amortization

     33,909        (19,467   (8)      14,442   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total Expenses

     846,614        28,047           874,661   

Income from operations

     57,942        (30,433        27,509   

Other income (expense):

         

Interest expense

     (12,787     11,732      (9)      (1,055

Interest income

     506             506   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Other expense, net

     (12,281     11,732           (549
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Income from operations before provision for income taxes

     45,661        (18,701        26,960   

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

     20,003        (7,443   (10)      12,560   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Net income from continuing operations

     25,658        (11,258        14,400   

Less: net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

     (186          (186
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Net income from continuing operations attributable to Ensign

    $ 25,844       $ (11,258       $ 14,586   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

 

Basic earnings from continuing operations attributable to Ensign per share:

    $ 1.18            $ 0.67   
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

Diluted earnings from continuing operations attributable to Ensign per share:

    $ 1.16            $ 0.65   
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

Weighted average number of shares outstanding:

         

Basic

     21,900             21,900   
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

Diluted

     22,364             22,364   
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements.

 

65


Table of Contents

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in thousands)

Basis of Presentation

Immediately following the Spin-Off, Ensign will continue to provide healthcare services through its existing operations. The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements give effect to the Spin-Off and related transactions as discussed above.

Pro Forma Adjustments

 

(1) Removal of assets and liabilities attributable to the entities that own the Ensign Properties and the entities that operate three independent living facilities. These adjustments include:

 

Assets:

  

Property and equipment balances, net of certain land, equipment, furniture and fixtures that will not be transferred to CareTrust

   $ 420,168   

Cash

     927   

Accounts receivable

     13   

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     1,069   

Deferred tax assets – current

     1,173   

Deferred tax assets

     10   

Restricted and other assets

     2,626   

Liabilities:

  

Accounts payable

     2,004   

Accrued wages and related liabilities

     247   

Other accrued liabilities

     2,036   

Current maturities of long-term, debt

     7,469   

Debt, net of debt discount

     250,019   

Interest rate swap liability

     1,631   

Deferred rent and other long-term liabilities

     1,174   

 

(2) Elimination of Ensign’s net equity interest in Ensign Properties resulting from the Spin-Off of assets and liabilities and related transactions.

 

(3) To remove the accumulated other comprehensive loss related to the interest rate swap that has been attributed to Ensign Properties debt.

 

(4) Reflects cash transferred from CareTrust to Ensign.

 

(5) Reflects the issuance cost associated with the new $150,000 revolving credit facility.

 

(6) Reflects changes in rent charges resulting from the removal of intercompany rental charges and replacement of such in accordance with the Master Leases.

 

(7) Removal of Spin-Off transactional related expenses of $1,590 incurred for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and $4,049 incurred through December 31, 2013, attributable to the entities that own the CareTrust Properties as these amounts have been included in the historical combined income statement of CareTrust.

 

(8) To adjust depreciation expense for the property and equipment transferred from Ensign to Ensign Properties, net of certain equipment, furniture and fixtures that will not be transferred.

 

66


Table of Contents

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(dollars in thousands)

 

 

(9) Represents the adjustments to interest expense due to the following:

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,

2014
    Year Ended
December 31,

2013
 

Indebtedness attributed to the Ensign Properties

   $ (3,327   $ (12,647

New revolving credit facility

     229        915   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net decrease to interest expense

   $ (3,098   $ (11,732
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(10) The pro forma adjustments were tax effected using the statutory tax rate of 39.8%.

 

(11) Removal of operations attributed and contributed to Ensign Properties consisting of the operations of the three independent living facilities that Ensign Properties will own and operate following the Spin-Off.

 

67


Table of Contents

SELECTED COMBINED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA

The following table sets forth the combined historical financial data for Ensign Properties (as described below) on a historical basis. Prior to the Spin-Off, we will not have operated our business separate from Ensign. We use the term “Ensign Properties” to mean the carve-out business of the entities that own the skilled nursing, assisted living and independent living facilities that we will own following the Spin-Off, and the operations of the three independent living facilities that we will operate following the Spin-Off.

The combined historical financial data as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and for each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, has been derived from Ensign Properties’ audited combined financial statements included elsewhere in this information statement. The combined historical financial data as of March 31, 2014, and for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, has been derived from Ensign Properties’ unaudited condensed combined financial statements included elsewhere in this information statement. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the annual combined financial statements have been condensed or omitted, as permitted under applicable rules and regulations. Our management believes the assumptions underlying Ensign Properties’ combined financial statements and accompanying notes are reasonable. However, such combined financial statements may not necessarily reflect our financial condition and results of operations in the future, or what they would have been had we been a separate, stand-alone company during the periods presented. The results of operations presented in the combined financial statements are not necessarily representative of operations for the entire year.

The following should be read in conjunction with Ensign Properties’ combined financial statements and accompanying notes and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” each of which are included elsewhere in this information statement.

 

    As of or For the Three
Months Ended March 31,
    As of or For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
              2014                         2013                         2013                         2012                         2011            
   

(in thousands)

 

Operating data:

         

Total net revenues

  $ 12,872      $ 11,336      $ 48,796      $ 42,063      $ 31,941   

(Loss) income before income taxes

  $ (363   $ 590      $ (272   $ 232      $ (6,514

Net (loss) income

  $ (400   $ 568      $ (395   $ 110      $ (5,341

Balance sheet data:

         

Total assets

  $ 437,303      $ 402,338      $ 430,466      $   398,978      $   374,466   

Mortgage notes payable

  $ 114,100      $ 117,491      $ 114,982      $ 118,317      $ 99,745   

Senior secured term loan

  $ 64,688      $ 68,438      $ 65,624      $ 69,375      $ 73,125   

Senior secured revolving credit facility

  $ 78,700      $ 20,000      $ 78,701      $ 20,000      $ 15,000   

Total equity

  $ 172,724      $ 189,302      $ 162,689      $ 184,548      $ 179,609   

Other financial data:

         

FFO

  $ 5,799      $ 6,160      $ 23,023      $ 21,213      $ 11,277   

FAD

  $ 5,978      $ 6,342      $ 23,740      $ 21,933      $ 11,893   

 

 

(1)

We believe that net income, as defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure. We also believe that FFO, as defined by NAREIT, and FAD are important non-GAAP supplemental measures of operating performance for a REIT. FFO is defined as net income computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses from real estate dispositions, plus real estate depreciation and amortization and impairment charges. FAD is defined as FFO excluding non-cash expenses such as stock-based compensation expense and amortization of deferred financing costs. We believe that the use of FFO and FAD, combined with the

 

68


Table of Contents
  required GAAP presentations, improves the understanding of operating results of REITs among investors and makes comparisons of operating results among such companies more meaningful. We consider FFO and FAD to be useful measures for reviewing comparative operating and financial performance because, by excluding gains or losses from real estate dispositions, impairment charges and real estate depreciation and amortization, and, for FAD, by excluding non-cash expenses such as stock-based compensation expense and amortization of deferred financing costs, FFO and FAD can help investors compare our operating performance between periods and to other REITs. See further discussion of FFO and FAD in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Discussion of Historical Results of Operations of Ensign Properties—Non-GAAP Measurements.”

 

69


Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following is a discussion and analysis of (i) our anticipated financial condition immediately following the Spin-Off and (ii) Ensign Properties’ historical results of operations, consisting of the carve-out business of the entities that own the skilled nursing, assisted living and independent living facilities that we will own following the Spin-Off, and the operations of the three independent living facilities that we will operate following the Spin-Off. The following should be read in conjunction with Ensign Properties’ combined financial statements and accompanying notes, as well as our unaudited pro forma combined financial statements and accompanying notes, each of which are included elsewhere in this information statement. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those projected, forecasted or expected in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those which are discussed below and elsewhere in this information statement. See also “Risk Factors” and “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” Prior to the Spin-Off, we will not have operated our business separate from Ensign. Ensign Properties’ historical results of operations include the results of operations of the entities that own and operate, as applicable, the properties that Ensign will contribute to us prior to the Spin-Off, and our management believes the assumptions underlying Ensign Properties’ combined financial statements and accompanying notes are reasonable. However, such combined financial statements may not necessarily reflect our financial condition and results of operations in the future, or what they would have been had we been a separate, stand-alone company during the periods presented.

OVERVIEW

At the time of the Spin-Off, CareTrust will hold substantially all of the real property currently owned by Ensign. On a pro forma basis as of March 31, 2014, CareTrust’s initial portfolio consists of 97 skilled nursing, assisted living and independent living facilities. After the Spin-Off, all of these properties will be leased to Ensign on a triple-net basis, except for three independent living facilities that CareTrust will operate. On a pro forma basis as of March 31, 2014, the 94 facilities leased to Ensign have a total of 10,121 operational beds and units and are located in Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Nebraska, Nevada, Texas, Utah and Washington, and the three independent living facilities operated by CareTrust have a total of 264 units and are located in Texas and Utah.

Following the Spin-Off, we will be a publicly traded, self-administered, self-managed REIT primarily engaged in the ownership, acquisition and leasing of healthcare-related properties. We expect to generate revenues primarily by leasing healthcare facilities to healthcare operators in triple-net lease arrangements, under which the tenant is solely responsible for the costs related to the property (including property taxes, insurance, and maintenance and repair costs). We intend to conduct and manage our business as one operating segment for internal reporting and internal decision making purposes. We expect to grow our portfolio by pursuing opportunities to acquire additional properties that will be leased to a diverse group of local, regional and national healthcare providers, which may include Ensign, as well as senior housing operators and related businesses. We also anticipate diversifying our portfolio over time, including by acquiring properties in different geographic markets, and in different asset classes.

We intend to elect to be taxed and intend to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ending December 31, 2014. We intend to operate through an umbrella partnership, commonly referred to as an UPREIT structure, in which substantially all of our properties and assets will be held through the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership is managed by our wholly owned subsidiary, CareTrust GP, LLC, which is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. To maintain REIT status, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we annually distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains. See “U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.”

 

70


Table of Contents

COMPONENTS OF OUR REVENUES AND EXPENSES FOLLOWING THE SPIN-OFF

Revenues

Following the Spin-Off, our earnings will primarily be attributable to the rental revenue from the lease of our properties to Ensign pursuant to the Master Leases. The Master Leases consist of multiple triple-net leases pursuant to which Ensign is responsible for all facility maintenance and repair, insurance required in connection with the leased properties and the business conducted on the leased properties, taxes levied on or with respect to the leased properties and all utilities and other services necessary or appropriate for the leased properties and the business conducted on the leased properties. The rent will be a fixed component that will be initially set near the time of the Spin-Off. We currently anticipate that the annual revenues from the Master Leases will be approximately $56.0 million during each of the first two years of the Master Leases, which results in a lease coverage ratio of approximately 1.85 based on the aggregate adjusted net operating income (“ANOI”) from the leased properties for the 12 months ended March 31, 2014. We define ANOI as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, and rent. A management fee equal to five percent of gross revenues is included as a reduction to ANOI. Commencing in the third year under the Master Leases, we anticipate that the annual revenues from the Master Leases will be escalated annually by an amount equal to the product of (1) the lesser of the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index (but not less than zero) or 2.5%, and (2) the prior year’s rent.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative costs are expected for items such as compensation costs (including stock based compensation awards), professional services, office costs and other costs associated with administrative activities. To the extent requested by us, Ensign will provide us with certain administrative and support services on a transitional basis pursuant to the Transition Services Agreement. We expect that the fees charged to us for transition services furnished pursuant to the Transition Services Agreement will approximate the actual cost incurred by Ensign in providing such transition services to us for the relevant period.

General and administrative expenses are anticipated to be approximately $4.5 million to $5.0 million in the first year after the Spin-Off, consisting of cash compensation, professional services, administration and other costs and transitional services costs. These amounts were determined based on the experience of management and discussions with outside service providers, consultants and advisors. Non-cash stock-based compensation, incentive-based cash compensation and acquisition costs are not included in these amounts. The details of our future anticipated equity grants and compensation have not yet been determined for our executive officers. The amount of compensation-related expense, including incentive-based cash compensation and non-cash stock compensation expense, actually incurred by us in the first year after the Spin-Off will be based on determinations by our compensation committee following the Spin-Off.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense

We will incur depreciation and amortization expense for the property and equipment transferred to us from Ensign, which is expected to be between $19.0 million and $22.0 million in the first year after the Spin-Off. This amount was determined based on annualizing the depreciation and amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2014.

Revenues and Operating Expenses of Our Independent Living Operations

We will own and operate three independent living facilities. We anticipate these three independent living facilities will generate annual net revenues of approximately $2.3 million and incur annual operating expenses of approximately $2.2 million in the first year after the Spin-Off. These amounts were determined based on annualizing the net revenues and operating expenses of these facilities for the three months ended March 31, 2014.

 

71


Table of Contents

Interest Expense

We will incur interest expense from our borrowing obligations and the amortization of our debt issuance costs related to our indebtedness. Our current estimate of debt outstanding following the Spin-Off is approximately $359.0 million in outstanding borrowings, and annual interest costs of approximately $22.6 million based on a weighted average interest rate of 6.30%. This estimate will vary depending on the actual number of properties that we will own at the time of the Spin-Off and other factors. See “—Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for more information.

DISCUSSION OF HISTORICAL RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF ENSIGN PROPERTIES

Basis of Presentation

Ensign Properties’ combined financial statements were prepared on a stand-alone basis and were derived from the combined financial statements and accounting records of Ensign. These statements reflect the combined historical financial condition and results of operations of the carve-out business of the entities that own the skilled nursing, assisted living and independent living facilities that we will own following the Spin-Off, and the operations of the three independent living facilities that we will operate following the Spin-Off, in accordance with GAAP. The various entities comprising Ensign Properties are wholly owned subsidiaries of Ensign, and we use the term “Parent” in the tables below to mean Ensign in such capacity.

These financial statements are presented as if such properties had been combined for all periods presented. All intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated.

Operating Results

Our primary business following the Spin-Off will consist of acquiring, financing and owning real property to be leased to third party tenants in the healthcare sector. As of March 31, 2014, after giving pro forma effect to the separation of the healthcare operations from the independent living operations at two locations, the 94 facilities leased to Ensign have a total of 10,121 operational beds and units and are located in Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Nebraska, Nevada, Texas, Utah and Washington, and the three independent living facilities operated by CareTrust have a total of 264 units and are located in Texas and Utah.

Non-GAAP Measurements

We believe that net income, as defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure. We also believe that FFO, as defined by NAREIT, and FAD are important non-GAAP supplemental measures of operating performance for a REIT. Because the historical cost accounting convention used for real estate assets requires straight-line depreciation except on land, such accounting presentation implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. However, since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market and other conditions, presentations of operating results for a REIT that uses historical cost accounting for depreciation could be less informative. Thus, NAREIT created FFO as a supplemental measure of operating performance for REITs that excludes historical cost depreciation and amortization, among other items, from net income, as defined by GAAP. FFO is defined by NAREIT as net income computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses from real estate dispositions, plus real estate depreciation and amortization and impairment charges. We compute FFO in accordance with NAREIT’s definition. FAD is defined as FFO excluding non-cash expenses such as stock-based compensation expense and amortization of deferred financing costs. We believe that the use of FFO and FAD, combined with the required GAAP presentations, improves the understanding of operating results of REITs among investors and makes comparisons of operating results among such companies more meaningful. We consider FFO and FAD to be useful measures for reviewing comparative operating and financial performance because, by excluding gains or losses from real estate dispositions, impairment charges and real estate depreciation and amortization, and, for FAD, by excluding non-cash expenses

 

72


Table of Contents

such as stock-based compensation expense and amortization of deferred financing costs, FFO and FAD can help investors compare our operating performance between periods and to other REITs. While FFO and FAD are relevant and widely used measures of operating performance of REITs, they do not represent cash flows from operations or net income as defined by GAAP and should not be considered an alternative to those measures in evaluating our liquidity or operating performance. FFO and FAD do not purport to be indicative of cash available to fund our future cash requirements. Further, our computation of FFO and FAD may not be comparable to FFO and FAD reported by other REITs that do not define FFO in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition or define FAD differently than we do.

The following table reconciles our calculations of FFO and FAD to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 and on a pro forma basis for the three months ended March 31, 2014, and the year ended December 31, 2013:

 

                                                                                                               
    For the Three Months
Ended March 31,
    For the Year
Ended December 31,
 
    Pro Forma
      2014      
          2014                 2013           Pro Forma
      2013      
          2013                 2012                 2011        
   

(in thousands)

 

Net income (loss)

   $ 979      $ (400)      $ 570       $ 5,017      $ (395)       $ 110        $ (5,341)    

Depreciation and amortization

   
  5,247
  
      6,199        5,590        19,467        23,418          21,103           16,618    
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

FFO

    6,226        5,799        6,160        24,484        23,023        21,213         11,277    

Stock-based compensation

    4        4        7        18        18        15         15    

Amortization of deferred financing costs

    298        175        175        1,191        699        705         601    
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

FAD

   $ 6,528      $ 5,978      $   6,342       $ 25,693      $ 23,740       $ 21,933        $ 11,893    
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

See “—Components of Our Revenues and Expenses Following the Spin-Off” for a discussion of our forecasted revenues, general and administrative expenses and interest expense amounts.

Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2013

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,
     Increase
(Decrease)
    Percentage
Difference
 
         2014              2013           
     (dollars in thousands)  

Revenues:

          

Rental income from Parent

     11,023         9,505         1,518        16

Tenant reimbursement

     1,262         1,219         43        4

Other revenue

     587         612         (25     -4

Expenses:

          

Depreciation and amortization

     6,199         5,590         609        11

Interest expense

     3,152         2,892         260        9

Interest – amortization of deferred financing cost

     175         175                0

Property taxes

     1,262         1,219         43        4

Acquisition costs

             67         (67     *nm   

Operating expenses

     543         463         80        17

General and administrative

     1,904         338         1,566        463

Provision for income taxes

     37         22         15        68

 

*not meaningful

Rental income from Parent. Rental income was $11.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $9.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The $1.5 million increase in rental income is primarily due to an increase of $1.0 million from 10 properties acquired after January 1, 2013.

 

73


Table of Contents

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.6 million or 11% for the three months ended March 31, 2014 to $6.2 million compared to $5.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The $0.6 million increase in depreciation and amortization was primarily due to an increase of $0.4 million from 10 properties acquired after January 1, 2013.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $0.3 million or 9% for the three months ended March 31, 2014 to $3.2 million compared to $2.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The increase was due to higher borrowings under our senior secured revolving credit facility, slightly offset by lower interest expense on our mortgage notes payable and senior secured term loan.

General and administrative expense. General and administrative expense increased $1.6 million or 463% for the three months ended March 31, 2014 to $1.9 million compared to $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The $1.6 million net increase is primarily related to legal and other costs related to the Spin-Off.

Year Ended December 31, 2013 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2012

 

                                                                                       
     Year Ended
December 31,
             
    

        2013        

   

        2012        

   

Increase
    (Decrease)    

   

Percentage
    Difference    

 
     (dollars in thousands)  

Revenues:

  

Rental income from Parent

   $ 41,242      $ 35,048      $ 6,194        18%   

Tenant reimbursement

     5,168        4,470        698        16%   

Other revenue

     2,386        2,545        (159)        (6%)   

Expenses:

        

Depreciation and amortization

     23,418        21,103        2,315        11%   

Interest expense

     11,948        11,502        446        4%   

Interest - amortization of deferred financing costs

     699        705        (6)        (1%)   

Property taxes

     5,168        4,470        698        16%   

Acquisition costs

     255        189        66       
35%
  

Operating expenses

     2,138        2,074        64        3%   

General and administrative

     5,442        1,788        3,654        204%   

Provision for income taxes

     123        122        1        1%   

Rental income from Parent. Rental income was $41.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $35.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The $6.2 million increase in rental income is primarily due to an increase of $4.5 million from 19 properties acquired after January 1, 2012.

Other revenue. Other revenue was $2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. These revenues primarily relate to the three independent living facilities we will operate. The decrease in revenue was due to a decline in occupancy and a slight decline in average daily rate.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $2.3 million or 11% for the year ended December 31, 2013 to $23.4 million compared to $21.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The $2.3 million increase in depreciation and amortization was primarily due to an increase of $1.4 million from 19 properties acquired after January 1, 2012.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $0.4 million or 4% for the year ended December 31, 2013 to $11.9 million compared to $11.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase was due to higher borrowings under our senior secured revolving credit facility slightly offset by lower interest expense on our mortgage notes payable and senior secured term loan.

 

74


Table of Contents

Interest – amortization of deferred financing costs. We incur interest amortization of deferred financing costs related to our indebtedness. During the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we incurred approximately $0.7 million of such amortization.

General and administrative expense. General and administrative expense increased $3.7 million or 204% for the year ended December 31, 2013 to $5.4 million compared to $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The $3.7 million net increase is primarily related to legal and other costs related to the Spin-Off of $4.0 million, slightly offset by a decline in other expenses.

Provision for income taxes. Provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $0.1 million.

Year Ended December 31, 2012 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2011

 

                                                                           
     Year Ended
December 31,
             
    

        2012        

   

        2011        

   

Increase
    (Decrease)    

   

Percentage
    Difference    

 
     (dollars in thousands)  

Revenues:

        

Rental income from Parent

   $     35,048          $     26,213        $     8,835          34%       

Tenant reimbursement

     4,470            3,912          558          14%       

Other revenue

     2,545            1,816          729          40%       

Expenses:

        

Depreciation and amortization

     21,103            16,618          4,485          27%       

Interest expense

     11,502            10,505          997          9%       

Interest - amortization of deferred financing costs

     705            601          104          17%       

Loss on extinguishment of debt

     —            2,542          (2,542)         *nm           

Property taxes

     4,470            3,912          558          14%       

Acquisition costs

     189            467          (278)         -60%       

Operating expenses

     2,074            1,433          641          45%       

General and administrative

     1,788            2,377          (589)         -25%       

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

     122            (1,173)         1,295          *nm           

 

 

*not meaningful

Rental income from Parent. Rental income was $35.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $26.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The $8.8 million increase in rental income is primarily due to an increase of $6.4 million from 30 properties acquired after January 1, 2011. Amounts due under the terms do not have contingent rental income that may be derived from our properties.

Other revenue. Other revenue was $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase in revenue primarily relates to the acquisition of an independent living facility in December 2011.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $4.5 million or 27% for the year ended December 31, 2012 to $21.1 million compared to $16.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase in depreciation and amortization was primarily due to an increase of $2.4 million from 30 properties acquired after January 1, 2011.

Interest expense. We incur interest expense comprised of costs of borrowings. During the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we incurred approximately $11.5 million and $10.5 million of interest expense, respectively. The increase in interest is primarily related to an increase in debt of approximately $20 million which was offset by lower effective interest rates.

 

75


Table of Contents

Interest – amortization of deferred financing costs. We incur interest amortization of deferred financing costs related to our indebtedness. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we expensed approximately $0.7 million compared to $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Loss on extinguishment of debt. The loss on extinguishment of debt for the year ended December 31, 2011 related to an exit fee and related extinguishment fee of $2.5 million which was paid in connection with the termination of a revolving credit facility and prepayment of indebtedness under the Fourth Amended and Restated Loan Agreement by and among specified subsidiaries of Ensign as borrowers thereunder, General Electric Capital Corporation, and the other lenders thereunder, dated as of November 6, 2009 (the “Six Project Note”).

General and administrative expense. General and administrative expense decreased $0.6 million or 25% for the year ended December 31, 2012 to $1.8 million, compared to $2.4 million for the year December 31, 2011. The $0.6 million net decrease is primarily related to decreases in executive compensation.

Provision for income taxes. Provision for income taxes was $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to benefit from income taxes of $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. This change resulted from the change in income before income taxes and change in the effective tax rate.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash Flows

The following table presents selected data from our combined statements of cash flows for the periods presented:

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,
    Year Ended
December 31,
 
     2014     2013     2013     2012     2011  
     (in thousands)  

Net cash provided by operating activities

   $
4,317
  
  $ 6,797      $ 26,632      $ 24,136      $ 14,012   

Net cash used in investing activities

     (12,675     (8,169     (54,733     (49,505     (143,757

Net cash provided by financing activities

     8,390        1,404        28,261        25,008        129,863   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     32        32        160        (361     118   

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

     895        735        735        1,096        978   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

   $ 927      $ 767      $ 895      $        735      $     1,096   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2013

Net cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $4.3 million compared to $6.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, a decrease of $2.5 million. The decrease was primarily due to a $1.9 million change in accounts payable and a $1.0 million change in net income offset by a $0.6 million increase in depreciation expense.

Net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $12.7 million compared to $8.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, an increase of $4.5 million. The increase was primarily the result of $12.7 million paid for equipment, furniture and fixtures in the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $4.3 million paid for equipment, furniture and fixtures in the three months ended March 31, 2013, partly offset by a property acquisition of $4.3 million in the first quarter of 2013.

 

76


Table of Contents

Net cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $8.4 million compared to $1.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, an increase of $7.0 million. This increase was primarily due to a net contribution from Parent.

Year Ended December 31, 2013 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2012

Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $26.6 million compared to $24.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $2.5 million. The increase was primarily due to our improved operating results, which contributed $24.1 million in 2013 after adding back depreciation and amortization, deferred income taxes, and loss on disposition of equipment, furniture, and fixtures (non-cash charges), as compared to $22.2 million for 2012, an increase of $1.9 million.

Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $54.7 million compared to $49.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $5.2 million. The increase was primarily the result of $55.6 million in cash paid for acquisitions of real estate and purchased equipment, furniture and fixtures in the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $49.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2012.

Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $28.3 million compared to $25.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $3.3 million. This increase was due to the following: issuance of debt totaling $58.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $36.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $22.2 million; principal payments on long-term debt totaling $7.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $16.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, a decrease of $9.6 million; payments of deferred financing costs totaling $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $0.5 million; and net distribution to Parent totaling $22.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to a net contribution from Parent of $5.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, a change of $28.1 million.

Year Ended December 31, 2012 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2011

Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $24.1 million compared to $14.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, an increase of $10.1 million. The increase was primarily due to our improved operating results, which contributed $22.2 million in 2012 after adding back depreciation and amortization, deferred income taxes, loss on extinguishment of debt, and loss on disposition of equipment, furniture, and fixtures (non-cash charges), as compared to $13.4 million for 2011, an increase of $8.8 million.

Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $49.5 million compared to $143.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, a decrease of $94.3 million. The decrease was primarily the result of $49.8 million in cash paid for acquisitions of real estate and purchased equipment, furniture and fixtures in the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $144.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2011.

Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $25.0 million as compared to $129.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, a decrease of $104.9 million. This decrease was primarily due to a net contribution of $5.6 million from Parent during the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to a net contribution of $88.7 million from Parent during the year ended December 31, 2011, as well as a decrease in proceeds received from issuance of debt from $90.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 to $36.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. These decreases were partially offset by a reduction in long-term debt principal repayments from $44.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 to $16.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The remaining decrease is offset by cash paid for extinguishment of debt and reduction in payments of deferred financing costs.

 

77


Table of Contents

Senior Unsecured Notes Issuance

Prior to the Spin-Off, we anticipate that our Operating Partnership will issue up to $260.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes. In connection with the Spin-Off, CareTrust will transfer to Ensign approximately $220.8 million of proceeds from the issuance of the notes in order for Ensign to repay certain indebtedness, pay trade payables and, subject to the approval of Ensign’s board of directors, pay up to eight regular quarterly dividends. The amount of proceeds to be transferred to Ensign was determined based on the desired capitalization of Ensign and CareTrust after the Spin-Off. It was not determined based on any appraisal or valuation of the CareTrust Properties. We will use a portion of the proceeds from the notes issuance to pay the Purging Distribution, which we expect to make by December 31, 2014. The remaining proceeds will be available for working capital purposes, to fund acquisitions and for general corporate purposes.

We anticipate that the notes will be guaranteed, jointly and severally, by us, CareTrust GP, LLC and by certain of our Operating Partnership’s subsidiaries. The notes are expected to have terms customary for high yield senior notes of this type, including: customary covenants relating to debt incurrence, maintenance of unencumbered assets, restricted payments, asset sales, transactions with affiliates and merger or sale of all or substantially all of CareTrust’s assets; and customary redemption and repurchase provisions and events of default.

The foregoing summarizes some of the currently expected terms of our notes. However, the foregoing summary does not purport to be complete, and the terms of the notes have not yet been finalized. There may be changes to the expected principal amount and terms of the notes, some of which may be material. Nothing in this summary or otherwise herein shall constitute or be deemed to constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy the notes.

Revolving Credit Facility

We anticipate that our Operating Partnership will enter into a credit agreement providing for a revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to $150.0 million to be provided by a syndicate of banks and other financial institutions. We expect to use borrowings under the revolving credit facility after the Spin-Off for working capital purposes, to fund acquisitions and for general corporate purposes.

We anticipate that, subject to customary conditions, including obtaining commitments and pro forma compliance with the financial maintenance covenants, the Operating Partnership will be able to obtain incremental revolving or term loans under the revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount not to exceed $75.0 million. We do not anticipate there being any commitments to provide such incremental loans upon entering into the revolving credit facility or at the time of the Spin-Off.

We anticipate the interest rates per annum applicable to loans under the revolving credit facility to be, at the Operating Partnership’s option, equal to either a base rate plus a margin ranging from 1.00% to 1.50% per annum or LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 2.00% to 2.50% per annum, based on the debt to asset value ratio of the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries. In addition, we expect that the Operating Partnership will pay a commitment fee on the unused portion of the commitments under the revolving credit facility that will vary depending on the amount of such unused commitments, and is expected to range from 0.35% to 0.50% per annum.

We anticipate that the revolving credit facility will not be subject to interim amortization. We expect that the Operating Partnership will not be required to repay any loans under the revolving credit facility prior to maturity, other than to the extent the outstanding borrowings exceed the outstanding commitments under the revolving credit facility or to the extent the outstanding borrowings exceed the sum of the borrowing base values attributable to the eligible properties we mortgage as security under the revolving credit facility. We expect that the Operating Partnership will be permitted to prepay all or any portion of the loans under the revolving credit facility prior to maturity without premium or penalty, subject to reimbursement of any LIBOR breakage costs of the lenders.

 

78


Table of Contents

We anticipate that the revolving credit facility will be guaranteed, jointly and severally, by us and by certain of our Operating Partnership’s wholly owned subsidiaries. The revolving credit facility is expected to contain customary covenants that, among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, the ability of the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries to grant liens on their assets, incur indebtedness, sell assets, make investments, engage in acquisitions, mergers or consolidations and pay certain dividends and other restricted payments. We also anticipate that the revolving credit facility will require us to comply with financial maintenance covenants to be tested quarterly, consisting of a maximum debt to asset value ratio, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and minimum net worth. We anticipate that the revolving credit facility will also contain certain customary events of default. We anticipate that CareTrust will be required to maintain its status as a REIT on and after the effective date of its election to be treated as a REIT.

The revolving credit facility is expected to be secured by certain of our properties, and the amount available to be drawn under the revolving credit facility will be based on the borrowing base values attributed to such mortgaged properties. As of the effective date of the revolving credit facility, we expect the amount available to be drawn thereunder to be approximately $84 million. The revolving credit facility will also be secured by certain personal property of our subsidiaries that have provided mortgages, partnership interests in the Operating Partnership that we own and equity interests in our subsidiaries that guarantee the revolving credit facility.

The foregoing summarizes some of the currently expected terms of our revolving credit facility. However, the foregoing summary does not purport to be complete, and the terms of the revolving credit facility have not yet been finalized. There may be changes to the expected size and other terms of the revolving credit facility, some of which may be material.

Mortgage Indebtedness

At the time of the Spin-Off, we anticipate that our subsidiaries will have aggregate mortgage indebtedness to third parties of approximately $99.0 million secured by ten of the facilities to be owned by us following completion of the Spin-Off. This amount reflects existing mortgage indebtedness that totaled approximately $48.5 million as of March 31, 2014 (less required principal payments), and an additional mortgage loan of approximately $50.5 million that we expect to obtain prior to the Spin-Off.

We believe that our available cash at the time of the Spin-Off, expected operating cash flows and the revolving credit facility will provide sufficient funds for our operations, anticipated scheduled debt service payments and dividend requirements for the twelve-month period following the Spin-Off.

We intend to invest in additional healthcare properties as suitable opportunities arise and adequate sources of financing are available. We expect that future investments in properties, including any improvements or renovations of current or newly-acquired properties, will depend on and will be financed by, in whole or in part, our existing cash, borrowings available to us pursuant to the revolving credit facility we expect to enter into in connection with the Spin-Off, future borrowings or the proceeds from additional issuances of common stock or other securities. In addition, we may seek financing from U.S. government agencies, including through Fannie Mae and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, in appropriate circumstances in connection with acquisitions and refinancings of existing mortgage loans.

Although we expect, pursuant to indebtedness we expect to incur in connection with the Spin-Off, to be subject to restrictions on our ability to incur indebtedness, we expect that we will be able to refinance existing indebtedness or incur additional indebtedness for acquisitions or other purposes, if needed. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to refinance our indebtedness, incur additional indebtedness or access additional sources of capital, such as by issuing common stock or other debt or equity securities, on terms that are acceptable to us or at all.

 

79


Table of Contents

OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and commitments at December 31, 2013 as if the Ensign secured credit facility and secured mortgage indebtedness had been attributed to Ensign Properties.

 

     Payments Due by Period  
         Total          Less than 1
Year
     1 Year to
Less than 3
Years
     3 Years to less
    than 5 Years    
     More than
    5 years    
 
    

 

(in thousands)

 

Senior secured term loan(1)

   $ 73,520       $ 5,532       $ 11,365       $ 56,623       $ —     

Senior secured revolving credit facility(2)

     87,674         2,555         4,199         80,920         —     

Mortgage notes payable(3)

     142,488         10,998         65,300         36,330         29,860   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 303,682       $ 19,085       $ 80,864       $ 173,873       $ 29,860   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

(1)  Represents the term loan portion of Ensign’s existing senior secured credit facility that is attributable to Ensign Properties. Amounts include interest payments of $7.9 million.
(2)  Represents the revolving credit facility portion of Ensign’s existing senior secured credit facility that is attributable to Ensign Properties. Amounts include interest payments of $9.0 million.
(3)  Represents Ensign mortgage notes payable attributable to Ensign Properties. Amounts include interest payments of $26.8 million.

We will assume Ensign’s existing mortgage indebtedness ($48.5 million as of March 31, 2014) on ten of the properties that we will own following the Spin-Off. We expect to increase our mortgage indebtedness on these ten properties by approximately $50.5 million prior to the Spin-Off. In addition, prior to the Spin-Off, we anticipate issuing up to $260.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes. We also anticipate entering into a $150.0 million revolving credit facility to be provided by a syndicate of banks and other financial institutions. However, we have not yet entered into any commitments with respect to such financing arrangements, and, accordingly, the terms of such financing arrangements have not yet been determined, remain under discussion and are subject to change, including as a result of market conditions. See “—Liquidity and Capital Resources” above for a further description of our expected indebtedness after the Spin-Off.

The following pro forma table summarizes our contractual obligations and commitments, including our mortgage indebtedness, at December 31, 2013, as if the following had occurred on December 31, 2013: the Spin-Off; the issuance of up to $260.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes; the additional mortgage loan of approximately $50.5 million; the repayment of certain obligations attributable to Ensign Properties; and the entrance into a new $150.0 million revolving credit facility.

 

                                                                                              
     Payments Due by Period  
         Total          Less than 1
Year
     1 Year to
Less than 3
Years
     3 years to Less
    than 5 Years    
     More than
    5 Years    
 
    

 

(in thousands)

 

Senior unsecured notes(1)

    $ 373,750        $ 16,250        $ 32,500        $ 32,500        $ 292,500   

Revolving credit facility(2)

     3,750         750         1,500         1,500           

Mortgage note payable(3)

     117,424         8,042         62,741         46,641           
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

    $ 494,924        $ 25,042        $ 96,741        $ 80,641        $ 292,500   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

(1)  Amounts include interest payments of $113.8 million. We anticipate the notes will bear interest at an annual rate of 6.25% with a term of seven or eight years.
(2)  Represents the unused revolving credit facility fee.
(3)  We will assume Ensign’s mortgage indebtedness associated with ten of the properties that we will own following the Spin-Off. We expect to increase our mortgage indebtedness on these ten properties by approximately $50.5 million prior to the Spin-Off. Amounts include interest payments of $18.1 million.

 

80


Table of Contents

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES

We anticipate incurring average annual capital expenditures of $400 to $500 per unit in connection with the operations of our three independent living facilities. Capital expenditures for each property leased under the Master Leases are generally the responsibility of the tenant, except that the tenant will have an option to require us to finance certain capital expenditures up to an aggregate of 20% of our initial investment in such property.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

We make certain judgments and use certain estimates and assumptions when applying accounting principles in the preparation of our combined financial statements. The nature of the estimates and assumptions are material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain factors or the susceptibility of such factors to change. We have identified the accounting for income taxes, real estate properties, impairment of long-lived assets, fair value of financial instruments, revenue recognition and derivatives and hedging activities as critical accounting estimates, as they are the most important to our financial statement presentation and require difficult, subjective and complex judgments.

We believe the current assumptions and other considerations used to estimate amounts reflected in our combined financial statements are appropriate. However, if actual experience differs from the assumptions and other considerations used in estimating amounts reflected in our combined financial statements, the resulting changes could have a material adverse effect on our combined results of operations and, in certain situations, could have a material adverse effect on our combined financial condition.

Emerging Growth Company

Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act, for complying with new or revised accounting standards applicable to public companies. In other words, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to take advantage of this extended transition period. As a result of this election, our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates for such new or revised standards. We may elect to comply with public company effective dates at any time, and such election would be irrevocable pursuant to Section 107(b) of the JOBS Act.

Income Taxes

We anticipate that we will qualify to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencing with the taxable year ending December 31, 2014, and we intend to continue to be organized and to operate in a manner that will permit us to qualify as a REIT. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income to stockholders. As a REIT, we will generally not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on income that we distribute as dividends to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on our taxable income at regular corporate income tax rates, and dividends paid to our stockholders would not be deductible by us in computing taxable income. Any resulting corporate liability could be substantial and could materially and adversely affect our net income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders. Unless we were entitled to relief under certain Code provisions, we also would be disqualified from re-electing to be taxed as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which we failed to qualify to be taxed as a REIT.

Historically, our operations have been included in Ensign’s U.S. federal and state income tax returns and all income taxes have been paid by Ensign. Income tax expense and other income tax related information contained in these combined financial statements are presented on a separate tax return basis as if we filed our

 

81


Table of Contents

own tax returns. Management believes that the assumptions and estimates used to determine these tax amounts are reasonable. However, our combined financial statements may not necessarily reflect our income tax expense or tax payments in the future, or what our tax amounts would have been if we had been a stand-alone company during the periods presented.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are established for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of our assets and liabilities at tax rates in effect when such temporary differences are expected to reverse. We generally expect to fully utilize our deferred tax assets; however, when necessary, we record a valuation allowance to reduce our net deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.

When we take uncertain income tax positions that do not meet the recognition criteria, we record a liability for underpayment of income taxes and related interest and penalties, if any. In considering the need for and magnitude of a liability for such positions, we must consider the potential outcomes from a review of the positions by the taxing authorities.

In determining the need for a valuation allowance or the need for and magnitude of liabilities for uncertain tax positions, we make certain estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions are based on, among other things, knowledge of operations, markets, historical trends and likely future changes and, when appropriate, the opinions of advisors with knowledge and expertise in relevant fields. Due to certain risks associated with our estimates and assumptions, actual results could differ.

Real Estate Properties

Real estate properties consist of land, buildings and improvements, integral equipment, furniture and fixtures, and are stated at historical cost. Real estate costs related to the acquisition and improvement of properties are capitalized over the expected useful life of the asset. Repair and maintenance costs are charged to expense as incurred, and significant replacements and betterments are capitalized.

In accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations, we allocate the purchase price of acquisitions to the various components of the acquisition using estimates based upon the relative fair value of each component. In determining fair value, we use current appraisals or other third party opinions of value. The most significant components of our allocations are typically the allocation of value to land and buildings. In the case of the value of buildings and the allocation of value to land and other intangibles, the estimates of the value of these components will affect the depreciation and amortization we record over the estimated useful life of the property acquired. Transaction costs related to acquisitions are expensed as incurred.

We consider the period of future benefit of an asset to determine its appropriate useful life. Depreciation on our buildings and improvements is computed using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of from 5 years up to 40 years. If we use a shorter or longer estimated useful life, it could have a material impact on our results of operations. We believe that 5 to 40 years is an appropriate estimate of useful life. We continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amount of our property and equipment may not be recoverable or realized.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Management periodically evaluates our real estate investments for impairment indicators, including the evaluation of our assets’ useful lives. Management also assesses the carrying value of our real estate investments whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. The judgment regarding the existence of impairment indicators is based on factors such as, but not limited to, market conditions, operator performance and legal structure. If indicators of impairment are present, management evaluates the carrying value of the related real estate investments in relation to the future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying facilities. Provisions for impairment losses related to long-lived assets

 

82


Table of Contents

are recognized when expected future undiscounted cash flows are determined to be less than the carrying values of the assets. An adjustment is made to the net carrying value of the real estate investments for the excess of carrying value over fair value. All impairments are taken as a period cost at that time, and depreciation is adjusted going forward to reflect the new value assigned to the asset.

If we decide to sell real estate properties, we evaluate the recoverability of the carrying amounts of the assets. If the evaluation indicates that the carrying value is not recoverable from estimated net sales proceeds, the property is written down to estimated fair value less costs to sell.

In the event of impairment, the fair value of the real estate investment is determined by market research, which includes valuing the property in its current use as well as other alternative uses, and involves significant judgment. Our estimates of cash flows and fair values of the properties are based on current market conditions and consider matters such as rental rates and occupancies for comparable properties, recent sales data for comparable properties, and, where applicable, contracts or the results of negotiations with purchasers or prospective purchasers. Our ability to accurately estimate future cash flows and estimate and allocate fair values impacts the timing and recognition of impairments. While we believe our assumptions are reasonable, changes in these assumptions may have a material impact on financial results.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Our financial instruments consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, an interest rate swap agreement, accounts receivable, and borrowings. We believe all of the financial instruments’ recorded values approximate fair values because of their nature or respective short durations. Our interest rate swap is carried at fair value on the balance sheet.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize rental revenue, including rental abatements, lease incentives and contractual fixed increases attributable to operating leases, from tenants under lease arrangements with minimum fixed and determinable increases on a straight-line basis over the non-cancellable term of the related leases when collectability is reasonably assured. Tenant recoveries related to the reimbursement of real estate taxes, insurance, repairs and maintenance, and other operating expenses are recognized as revenue in the period the expenses are incurred. The reimbursements are recognized and presented gross, as we are generally the primary obligor, and, with respect to purchasing goods and services from third-party suppliers, we have discretion in selecting the supplier and bear the associated credit risk. The authoritative guidance does not provide for the recognition of contingent revenue until all possible contingencies have been eliminated.

Derivatives and Hedging Activities

We evaluate variable and fixed interest rate risk exposure on a routine basis, and to the extent we believe that it is appropriate, we will offset most of our variable risk exposure by entering into interest rate swap agreements. It is our policy to only utilize derivative instruments for hedging purposes (i.e., not for speculation). We formally designate our interest rate swap agreements as hedges and document all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items. We formally assess effectiveness of our hedging relationships, both at the hedge inception and on an ongoing basis, then measure and record ineffectiveness. We would discontinue hedge accounting prospectively (i) if it is determined that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting change in the cash flows of a hedged item, (ii) when the derivative expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, (iii) if it is no longer probable that the forecasted transaction will occur, or (iv) if management determines that designation of the derivative as a hedge instrument is no longer appropriate. Our sole derivative is recorded on the balance sheet at its fair value.

 

83


Table of Contents

DIVIDENDS

We intend to elect to be taxed and intend to conduct our operations to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. We intend to make regular quarterly dividend payments to holders of our common stock. U.S. federal income tax law generally requires that a REIT distribute annually at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains, and that it pay tax at regular corporate rates to the extent that it annually distributes less than 100% of its taxable income. We intend to make regular quarterly dividend payments of all or substantially all of our taxable income to holders of our common stock out of assets legally available for this purpose, if and to the extent authorized by our board of directors. Before we make any dividend payments, whether for U.S. federal income tax purposes or otherwise, we must first meet both our operating requirements and debt service on our debt payable. If our cash available for distribution is less than our taxable income, we could be required to sell assets or borrow funds to make cash dividends or we may make a portion of the required dividend in the form of a taxable distribution of stock or debt securities.

We will make dividend payments based on our estimate of taxable earnings per share of common stock, but not earnings calculated pursuant to GAAP. Our dividends and taxable and GAAP earnings will typically differ due to items such as fair value adjustments, differences in premium amortization and discount accretion, and non-deductible general and administrative expenses. Our quarterly dividends per share may be substantially different than our quarterly taxable earnings and GAAP earnings per share.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

As of the date of this information statement, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our primary market risk exposure will be interest rate risk with respect to our expected indebtedness after the Spin-Off. This indebtedness will include existing mortgage indebtedness ($48.5 million as of March 31, 2014) that we will assume prior to the Spin-Off and indebtedness that we expect to incur prior to the Spin-Off, including approximately $50.5 million of additional mortgage indebtedness. Prior to the Spin-Off, we anticipate that our Operating Partnership will issue up to $260.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes that will have a fixed interest rate and a fixed maturity date. We also anticipate that our Operating Partnership will enter into a credit agreement providing for a revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to $150.0 million. See “—Liquidity and Capital Resources” above for further description of our expected indebtedness after the Spin-Off.

An increase in interest rates could make the financing of any acquisition by us more costly. Rising interest rates could also limit our ability to refinance our debt when it matures or cause us to pay higher interest rates upon refinancing and increase interest expense on refinanced indebtedness. We may manage, or hedge, interest rate risks related to our borrowings by means of interest rate swap agreements. We also expect to manage our exposure to interest rate risk by maintaining a mix of fixed and variable rates for our indebtedness. However, the REIT provisions of the Code substantially limit our ability to hedge our assets and liabilities. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Taxation as a REIT—Complying with REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge effectively and may cause us to incur tax liabilities.”

 

84


Table of Contents

BUSINESS

Overview

We were formed as a Maryland corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Ensign on October 29, 2013. Ensign is a provider of healthcare and independent living services which, as of March 31, 2014, operated 120 facilities, nine home health and seven hospice operations, nine urgent care centers and a mobile x-ray and diagnostic company located in 11 western states. Ensign provides a broad spectrum of skilled nursing, assisted living, home health and hospice services, mobile x-ray and diagnostic, and urgent care services, including physical, occupational and speech therapies, and other rehabilitative and healthcare services, for both long-term residents and short-stay rehabilitation patients.

On November 7, 2013, Ensign announced a plan to separate its healthcare business and its real estate business into two separate and independent publicly traded companies through the Spin-Off, in which Ensign will distribute all of the outstanding shares of our common stock to Ensign stockholders on a pro rata basis. Prior to the Spin-Off, Ensign will separate the healthcare operations from the independent living operations at two locations. At the time of the Spin-Off, CareTrust will hold substantially all of the real property currently owned by Ensign. On a pro forma basis as of March 31, 2014, CareTrust’s initial portfolio consists of 97 skilled nursing, assisted living and independent living facilities. After the Spin-Off, all of these properties will be leased to Ensign on a triple-net basis, except for three independent living facilities that CareTrust will operate.

Following the Spin-Off, we will be a separate and independent publicly traded, self-administered, self-managed REIT primarily engaged in the ownership, acquisition and leasing of healthcare-related properties. We expect to generate revenues primarily by leasing healthcare properties to healthcare operators in triple-net lease arrangements, under which the tenant is solely responsible for the costs related to the property (including property taxes, insurance, and maintenance and repair costs). We intend to conduct and manage our business as one operating segment for internal reporting and internal decision making purposes. We expect to grow our portfolio by pursuing opportunities to acquire additional facilities that will be leased to a diverse group of local, regional and national healthcare providers, which may include Ensign, as well as senior housing operators and related businesses. We also anticipate diversifying our portfolio over time, including by acquiring properties in different geographic markets, and in different asset classes.

Portfolio Summary

We will have a geographically diverse portfolio of properties, consisting of the following types:

 

    Skilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”) are licensed healthcare facilities that provide restorative, rehabilitative and nursing care for people not requiring the more extensive and sophisticated treatment available at acute care hospitals. Treatment programs include physical, occupational, speech, respiratory and other therapies, including sub-acute clinical protocols such as wound care and intravenous drug treatment. Charges for these services are generally paid from a combination of government reimbursement and private sources. As of March 31, 2014, our initial portfolio includes 82 SNFs, ten of which include assisted or independent living operations. All of these SNFs will be operated by Ensign under the Master Leases.

 

   

Assisted living facilities (“ALFs”) are licensed healthcare facilities that provide personal care services, support and housing for those who need help with activities of daily living, such as bathing, eating and dressing, yet require limited medical care. The programs and services may include transportation, social activities, exercise and fitness programs, beauty or barber shop access, hobby and craft activities, community excursions, meals in a dining room setting and other activities sought by residents. These facilities are often in apartment-like buildings with private residences ranging from single rooms to large apartments. Certain ALFs may offer higher levels of personal assistance for residents requiring memory care as a result of Alzheimer’s disease or other forms of dementia. Levels of personal assistance are based in part on local regulations. As of

 

85


Table of Contents
 

March 31, 2014, our initial portfolio includes 11 ALFs, some of which also contain independent living units. All of these ALFs will be operated by Ensign under the Master Leases.

 

    Independent living facilities (“ILFs”), also known as retirement communities or senior apartments, are not healthcare facilities. The facilities typically consist of entirely self-contained apartments, complete with their own kitchens, baths and individual living spaces, as well as parking for tenant vehicles. They are most often rented unfurnished, and generally can be personalized by the tenants, typically an individual or a couple over the age of 55. These facilities offer various services and amenities such as laundry, housekeeping, dining options/meal plans, exercise and wellness programs, transportation, social, cultural and recreational activities, on-site security and emergency response programs. As of March 31, 2014, our initial portfolio of four ILFs includes one that will be operated by Ensign and three that will be operated by us.

Our portfolio of SNFs, ALFs and ILFs is broadly diversified by geographic location throughout the western United States, with concentrations in Texas and California. The following tables display the geographic distribution of our properties and the related operational beds and units by asset class. Revenue and income information in the following tables is based on the historical financial information of Ensign Properties. Our properties are grouped into four categories: (i) Skilled Nursing Facilities—these are properties that are comprised exclusively of skilled nursing facilities; (ii) Skilled Nursing Campuses—these are properties that include a combination of skilled nursing facilities and assisted living or independent living facilities or both; (iii) Assisted Living and Independent Living Facilities—these are properties that include assisted living or independent living facilities, or a combination of the two; and (iv) Independent Living Facilities Operated by CareTrust—these are independent living facilities operated by CareTrust, unlike the other properties which are leased to a third party operator. The tables show the number of operational beds and units, which is the number available for occupancy as of the specified date. The number of beds or units that are operational may be less than the official licensed capacity. The information below is presented as of and for the periods indicated, after giving pro forma effect to the separation of the healthcare operations from the independent living operations at two locations.

Occupancy by Property Type:

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,

2014
    Year Ended  

Property Type

     2013     2012     2011  

Facilities Leased to Ensign:

        

Skilled Nursing Facilities

     75     75     78     78

Skilled Nursing Campuses

     78     76     77     78

Assisted Living and Independent Living Facilities

     84     83     78     82

Facilities Operated by CareTrust:

        

Independent Living Facilities

     72     73     77     83 %

Skilled Nursing Facilities:

 

     As of March 31, 2014  

State

   Facilities      Beds  

CA

                 14        1,465   

TX

     22        2,699   

AZ

     7        799  

UT

     9        907  

CO

     3        210  

ID

     5        408  

WA

     5        453  

NV

     1        92  

NE

     3        220  

IA

     3        185  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     72         7,438   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

86


Table of Contents

Skilled Nursing Campuses:

 

     As of March 31, 2014  

State

   Campuses      SNF
Beds
     ALF
Units
     ILF
Units
 

CA

                 2         158        121        24  

TX

     1         123        77        20  

AZ

     1         162        100          

UT

     1         235        37          

ID

     1         45        24          

NE

     2         105        41          

IA

     2         109        62          
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     10         937         462         44   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Assisted Living and Independent Living Facilities:

 

     As of March 31, 2014  

State

   Facilities      Units  

CA

                 2         223  

TX

     2         115  

AZ

     2         266  

UT

     1         69  

CO

     2         253  

WA

     1         102  

NV

     2         212  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     12         1,240   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Property Type - Rental Income:

 

     For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014  

Property Type

   Rental
Income

(in thousands)
     Percent
of Total
    Total
Beds/
Units
     Average
Monthly
Rental
Income Per
Bed/Unit(1)
 

Skilled Nursing Facilities

   $ 8,264         75     7,438       $ 370   

Skilled Nursing Campuses

     1,599         14     1,443         369   

Assisted Living and Independent Living Facilities

     1,160         11     1,240         312   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

Total

   $ 11,023         100     10,121        363  
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

     For the Year Ended December 31, 2013  

Property Type

   Rental
Income

(in thousands)
     Percent
of Total
    Total
Beds/
Units
     Average
Monthly
Rental
Income Per
Bed/Unit(1)
 

Skilled Nursing Facilities

   $ 31,005         75     7,438      $ 357   

Skilled Nursing Campuses

     6,192        15     1,443        358  

Assisted Living and Independent Living Facilities

     4,045        10     1,240        304  
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

Total

   $ 41,242         100     10,121        351  
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

  (1) Average monthly rental income per bed/unit is equivalent to average effective rent per bed/unit.

 

87


Table of Contents

Geographic Concentration - Rental Income:

(dollars in thousands)

 

         For the Three Months Ended    
March 31, 2014
    For the Year Ended
December 31, 2013
 

State

   Rental
Income
     Percent
of Total
    Rental
Income
     Percent
of Total
 

CA

   $ 2,370         22   $ 9,022         22

TX

     2,914         26     11,108        26

AZ

     1,443         13     5,262        13

UT

     1,580         14     5,942        14

CO

     387         3     1,512        4

ID

     480         4     1,837        4

WA

     634         6     1,903        5

NV

     393         4     1,540        4

NE

     409         4     1,492        4

IA

     413         4     1,624        4
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 11,023         100   $ 41,242         100 %
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Independent Living Facilities Operated by CareTrust:

 

                   For the Three Months Ended
March 31, 2014
     For the Year Ended
December 31, 2013
 

State

   Facilities      Units      Average Monthly
Revenue Per
Occupied Unit(1)
     Average Monthly
Revenue Per
Occupied Unit(1)
 

TX

                 2         207       $ 1,189       $ 1,187   

UT

     1         57         1,205         1,204   
  

 

 

    

 

 

       
     3         264         1,194         1,192   
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

(1)    Average monthly revenue per occupied unit is equivalent to average effective rent per unit, as the operator does not offer tenants free rent or other concessions.

        

Although Ensign or its subsidiaries have operated ILF units since 1999, ILFs are not generally healthcare facilities per se, and historically have neither been a focus, nor a significant part, of Ensign’s healthcare businesses. Over time, Ensign has acquired a relatively small number of ILFs and ILF units, either as part of larger transactions that included desirable SNF and/or ALF operations, or because Ensign believed that the target ILF assets could be economically converted to ALF operations. In structuring the Spin-Off, Ensign determined that its ILF businesses more closely match CareTrust’s real estate business and, to the extent they are economically separable from existing healthcare operations, are more appropriately included with the assets contributed to CareTrust in the Spin-Off. The ILF units which are not being contributed to CareTrust are part of larger campuses operated by Ensign subsidiaries, which are principally SNF or ALF operations with an ILF component that cannot be economically decoupled from the neighboring healthcare operations.

We view our ownership and operation of the three ILFs included in the Spin-Off as complementary to our real estate business. Our goal is to provide enhanced focus on their operations to improve their financial and operating performance. The three ILFs that we will own and operate are:

 

    Lakeland Hills Independent Living, located in Dallas, Texas with 168 units;

 

    The Cottages at Golden Acres, located in Dallas, Texas with 39 units; and

 

    The Apartments at St. Joseph Villa, located in Salt Lake City, Utah with 57 units.

Ten of our properties will be subject to existing mortgage indebtedness to GECC, which we will assume in connection with the Spin-Off. This mortgage indebtedness currently bears interest at rates of 6.95% to 7.50% and matures in June 2016. The amount outstanding as of March 31, 2014 was approximately $48.5 million. Based on the 25 year amortization, the principal amount due at maturity will be $45.4 million. Prior to the Spin-Off, we intend to increase the amount of mortgage indebtedness on these same 10 properties with an

 

88


Table of Contents

additional advance from GECC in an amount of approximately $50.5 million. The additional advance is expected to bear interest at a floating rate equal to the 90 day LIBOR plus 3.35%, reset monthly and subject to a LIBOR floor of 0.50%, with monthly principal and interest payments based on a 25 year amortization. The existing mortgage indebtedness will continue to bear interest at the existing interest rates until June 29, 2016, and then will convert to the floating rate described above. The GECC loan, as modified, is expected to have a term of 36 months from the date of the new advance, plus two 12-month extension options, the exercise of which will be conditioned, in each case, on the absence of any then-existing default and the payment of an extension fee equal to 0.25% of the then-outstanding principal balance of the GECC loan. The GECC loan will be prepayable without penalty, in whole or in part, after January 31, 2016.

Master Leases with Ensign

At the time of the Spin-Off, all of our properties (except for three ILFs) will be leased to Ensign pursuant to the Master Leases, which consist of multiple triple-net leases, each with its own pool of properties, that will have varying maturities and diversity in property geography. The Master Leases will provide for initial terms in excess of ten years with staggered expiration dates and no purchase options. At the option of Ensign, each Master Lease may be extended for up to either two or three five-year renewal terms beyond the initial term and, if elected, the renewal will be effective for all of the leased property then subject to the Master Lease. The rent will be a fixed component that will be initially set near the time of the Spin-Off. We currently anticipate that the annual revenues from the Master Leases will be approximately $56.0 million during each of the first two years of the Master Leases, which results in a lease coverage ratio of approximately 1.85 based on the ANOI from the leased properties for the 12 months ended March 31, 2014. Commencing in the third year, under the Master Leases, there is an annual rent escalator equal to the product of (1) the lesser of the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index (but not less than zero) or 2.5%, and (2) the prior year’s rent. The Master Leases will be guaranteed by Ensign. See “Our Relationship with Ensign Following the Spin-Off” for further description of the Master Leases.

Because we will lease substantially all of our properties to Ensign under the Master Leases, Ensign initially will be the source of substantially all of our revenues, and Ensign’s financial condition and ability and willingness to satisfy its obligations under the Master Leases and its willingness to renew those leases upon expiration of the initial base terms thereof will significantly impact our revenues and our ability to service our indebtedness and to make distributions to our stockholders. There can be no assurance that Ensign will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable it to satisfy its obligations under the Master Leases, and any inability or unwillingness on its part to do so would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity, on our ability to service our indebtedness and other obligations and on our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders, as required for us to qualify, and maintain our status, as a REIT. We also cannot assure you that Ensign will elect to renew its lease arrangements with us upon expiration of the initial base terms or any renewal terms thereof or, if such leases are not renewed, that we can reposition the affected properties on the same or better terms. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—We will be dependent on Ensign to make payments to us under the Master Leases, and an event that materially and adversely affects Ensign’s business, financial position or results of operations could materially and adversely affect our business, financial position or results of operations.”

Our Competitive Strengths

We believe that our ability to acquire, integrate and improve the facilities we will own will be a direct result of the following key competitive strengths:

Geographically Diverse Property Portfolio. Our properties are located in ten different states, with concentrations in Texas and California. The properties in any one state do not account for more than 31% of our total operational beds and units as of March 31, 2014. We believe this geographic diversification will limit the effect of changes in any one market on our overall performance.

Long-Term, Triple-Net Lease Structure. At the time of the Spin-Off, all of our properties (except for three ILFs) will be leased to Ensign under the Master Leases, pursuant to which Ensign is responsible for all

 

89


Table of Contents

facility maintenance and repair, insurance required in connection with the leased properties and the business conducted on the leased properties, taxes levied on or with respect to the leased properties and all utilities and other services necessary or appropriate for the leased properties and the business conducted on the leased properties. The Master Leases consist of multiple leases, each with its own pool of properties, with initial terms in excess of ten years with staggered expiration dates and no purchase options. At the option of Ensign, each Master Lease may be extended for up to either two or three five-year renewal terms beyond the initial term and, if elected, the renewal will be effective for all of the leased property then subject to the Master Lease.

Financially Secure Tenant. Ensign is an established provider of healthcare services with strong financial performance. For more information about Ensign, see “Where You Can Find More Information.”

Ability to Identify Talented Operators. As a result of our management team’s operating experience and network of relationships and insight, we anticipate that we will be able to identify and pursue working relationships with qualified local, regional and national healthcare providers and seniors housing operators. We expect to continue our disciplined focus on pursuing investment opportunities, primarily with respect to stabilized assets but also some strategic investment in improving properties, while seeking dedicated and engaged operators who possess local market knowledge, have solid operating records and emphasize quality services and outcomes. We intend to support these operators by providing strategic capital for facility acquisition, upkeep and modernization. Our management team’s experience gives us a key competitive advantage in objectively evaluating an operator’s financial position, care and service programs, operating efficiencies and likely business prospects.

Experienced Management Team. Gregory K. Stapley, our President and Chief Executive Officer, has extensive experience in the real estate and healthcare industries. Mr. Stapley has more than 27 years of experience in the acquisition, development and disposition of real estate including healthcare facilities and office, retail and industrial properties, including 14 years at Ensign. Our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), Mr. William M. Wagner, has more than 22 years of accounting and finance experience, primarily in real estate, including 11 years of experience working extensively for REITs. Most notably he worked for both Nationwide Health Properties, Inc., a healthcare REIT, and Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc., a lodging REIT, serving as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of each company. David M. Sedgwick, our Vice President of Operations, is a licensed nursing home administrator with more than 12 years of experience in skilled nursing operations, including turnaround operations, and trained over 100 Ensign nursing home administrators while he was Ensign’s Chief Human Capital Officer. Our executives have years of public company experience, including experience accessing both debt and equity capital markets to fund growth and maintain a flexible capital structure.

Flexible UPREIT Structure. We intend to operate through an umbrella partnership, commonly referred to as an UPREIT structure, in which substantially all of our properties and assets will be held through the Operating Partnership. Conducting business through the Operating Partnership will allow us flexibility in the manner in which we structure the acquisition of properties. In particular, an UPREIT structure will enable us to acquire additional properties from sellers in exchange for limited partnership units, which provides property owners the opportunity to defer the tax consequences that would otherwise arise from a sale of their real properties and other assets to us. As a result, this structure will allow us to acquire assets in a more efficient manner and may allow us to acquire assets that the owner would otherwise be unwilling to sell because of tax considerations.

Investment and Financing Policies

Our investment objectives will be to increase cash flow, provide quarterly cash dividends, maximize the value of our properties and acquire properties with cash flow growth potential. We intend to invest primarily in SNFs and senior housing, including ALFs and ILFs, as well as medical office buildings, long-term acute care hospitals and inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Our current properties are located in ten western states, but we intend to acquire properties in other geographic areas throughout the United States. Although our initial portfolio consists of owned real property, future investments may include first mortgages, mezzanine debt and other securities issued by, or joint ventures with, REITs or other entities that own real estate consistent with our investment objectives.

 

90


Table of Contents

There are no limitations on the percentage of total assets that may be invested in any particular type of property or investment. We expect that future investments in properties, including any improvements or renovations of current or newly-acquired properties, will be financed, in whole or in part, with cash flow from our operations, borrowings under our revolving credit facility, mortgage indebtedness or the proceeds from issuances of common stock, preferred stock, debt or other securities. There are no limitations on the number or amount of mortgages that may be placed on any property. At the time of the Spin-Off, all of our properties will be leased to Ensign pursuant to the Master Leases (except for three ILFs). As we acquire additional healthcare properties, we expect to enter into triple-net leases with other healthcare operators. We will be responsible for the management and operation of our ILFs. Our investment and financing policies and objectives are subject to change from time to time at the discretion of our board of directors without a vote of stockholders.

Business Strategies

Our primary goal is to create long-term stockholder value through the payment of consistent cash dividends and the growth of our asset base. To achieve this goal, we intend to pursue a business strategy focused on opportunistic acquisitions and property diversification. We also intend to further develop our relationships with tenants and healthcare providers with a goal to progressively expand the mixture of tenants managing and operating our properties.

The key components of our business strategies include:

Diversify Asset Portfolio. We expect to diversify through the acquisition of new and existing facilities from third parties and the expansion and upgrade of current facilities. We will employ what we believe to be a disciplined, opportunistic acquisition strategy with a focus on the acquisition of skilled nursing, assisted living and independent living properties, as well as medical office buildings, long-term acute care hospitals and inpatient rehabilitation facilities. As we acquire additional properties, we expect to further diversify by geography, asset class and tenant within the healthcare and healthcare-related sectors.

Maintain Balance Sheet Strength and Liquidity. We plan to maintain a capital structure that provides the resources and flexibility to support the growth of our business. We intend to maintain a mix of credit facility debt, mortgage debt and unsecured debt which, together with our anticipated ability to complete future equity financings, we expect will fund the growth of our property portfolio.

Develop New Tenant Relationships. We plan to cultivate new relationships with tenants and healthcare providers in order to expand the mix of tenants operating our properties and, in doing so, to reduce our dependence on Ensign. We expect that this objective will be achieved over time as part of our overall strategy to acquire new properties and further diversify our overall portfolio of healthcare properties.

Provide Capital to Underserved Operators. We believe that there is a significant opportunity to be a capital source to healthcare operators through the acquisition and leasing of healthcare properties that are consistent with our investment and financing strategy at appropriate risk-adjusted rates of returns, but that, due to size and other considerations, are not a focus for larger healthcare REITs. We intend to pursue acquisitions and strategic opportunities that meet our investing and financing strategy and that are attractively priced, including funding development of properties through construction loans and thereafter entering into sale and leaseback arrangements with such developers as well as other secured term financing and mezzanine lending. We will utilize our management team’s operating experience, network of relationships and industry insight to identify both large and small quality operators in need of capital funding for future growth. In appropriate circumstances, we may negotiate with operators to acquire individual healthcare properties from those operators and then lease those properties back to the operators pursuant to long-term triple-net leases.

Find Strategic Capital Improvements. We intend to support operators by providing capital to them for a variety of purposes, including capital expenditures and facility modernization. We expect to structure these

 

91


Table of Contents

investments as either lease amendments that produce additional rents or as loans that are repaid by operators during the applicable lease term.

Pursue Strategic Development Opportunities. We intend to work with operators and developers to identify strategic development opportunities. These opportunities may involve replacing or renovating facilities that may have become less competitive. We also intend to identify new development opportunities that present attractive risk-adjusted returns. We may provide funding to the developer of a property in conjunction with entering into a sale and leaseback transaction or an option to enter into a sale leaseback transaction for the property.

Government Regulation, Licensing and Enforcement

Overview

As operators of healthcare facilities, Ensign and any future tenants of our healthcare properties are typically subject to extensive and complex federal, state and local healthcare laws and regulations relating to fraud and abuse practices, government reimbursement, licensure and certificate of need and similar laws governing the operation of healthcare facilities, and we expect that the healthcare industry, in general, will continue to face increased regulation and pressure in the areas of fraud, waste and abuse, cost control, healthcare management and provision of services, among others. These regulations are wide-ranging and can subject our tenants to civil, criminal and administrative sanctions. Affected tenants may find it increasingly difficult to comply with this complex and evolving regulatory environment because of a relative lack of guidance in many areas as certain of our healthcare properties are subject to oversight from several government agencies and the laws may vary from one jurisdiction to another. Changes in laws and regulations and reimbursement enforcement activity and regulatory non-compliance by our tenants could have a significant effect on their operations and financial condition, which in turn may adversely affect us, as detailed below and set forth under “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business.”

The following is a discussion of certain laws and regulations generally applicable to operators of our healthcare facilities, and in certain cases, to us.

Fraud and Abuse Enforcement

There are various extremely complex federal and state laws and regulations governing healthcare providers’ relationships and arrangements and prohibiting fraudulent and abusive practices by such providers. These laws include, but are not limited to, (i) federal and state false claims acts, which, among other things, prohibit providers from filing false claims or making false statements to receive payment from Medicare, Medicaid or other federal or state healthcare programs, (ii) federal and state anti-kickback and fee-splitting statutes, including the Medicare and Medicaid anti-kickback statute, which prohibit the payment or receipt of remuneration to induce referrals or recommendations of healthcare items or services, (iii) federal and state physician self-referral laws (commonly referred to as the “Stark Law”), which generally prohibit referrals by physicians to entities with which the physician or an immediate family member has a financial relationship, (iv) the federal Civil Monetary Penalties Law, which prohibits, among other things, the knowing presentation of a false or fraudulent claim for certain healthcare services and (v) federal and state privacy laws, including the privacy and security rules contained in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, which provide for the privacy and security of personal health information. Violations of healthcare fraud and abuse laws carry civil, criminal and administrative sanctions, including punitive sanctions, monetary penalties, imprisonment, denial of Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement and potential exclusion from Medicare, Medicaid or other federal or state healthcare programs. These laws are enforced by a variety of federal, state and local agencies and can also be enforced by private litigants through, among other things, federal and state false claims acts, which allow private litigants to bring qui tam or “whistleblower” actions. Ensign is, and many of our future tenants are expected to be, subject to these laws, and some of them may in the future become the subject of governmental enforcement actions if they fail to comply with applicable laws.

Reimbursement

Sources of revenue for Ensign include (and for our future tenants is expected to include), among other sources, governmental healthcare programs, such as the federal Medicare program and state Medicaid programs,

 

92


Table of Contents

and non-governmental payors, such as insurance carriers and health maintenance organizations. For the three months ended March 31, 2014, and the year ended December 31, 2013, Ensign derived 71.1% and 72.2%, respectively, of its revenues from governmental payors. As federal and state governments focus on healthcare reform initiatives, and as the federal government and many states face significant budget deficits, efforts to reduce costs by these payors will likely continue, which may result in reduced or slower growth in reimbursement for certain services provided by Ensign and some of our other future tenants.

Healthcare Licensure and Certificate of Need

Our healthcare facilities are subject to extensive federal, state and local licensure, certification and inspection laws and regulations. In addition, various licenses and permits are required to dispense narcotics, operate pharmacies, handle radioactive materials and operate equipment. Many states require certain healthcare providers to obtain a certificate of need, which requires prior approval for the construction, expansion and closure of certain healthcare facilities. The approval process related to state certificate of need laws may impact some of our tenants’ abilities to expand or change their businesses.

Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”)

Although most of our properties are not required to comply with the ADA because of certain “grandfather” provisions in the law, some of our properties must comply with the ADA and similar state or local laws to the extent that such properties are “public accommodations,” as defined in those statutes. These laws may require removal of barriers to access by persons with disabilities in certain public areas of our properties where such removal is readily achievable. Under our triple-net lease structure, our tenants would generally be responsible for additional costs that may be required to make our facilities ADA-compliant. Noncompliance with the ADA could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants.

Environmental Matters

A wide variety of federal, state and local environmental and occupational health and safety laws and regulations affect healthcare facility operations. These complex federal and state statutes, and their enforcement, involve a myriad of regulations, many of which involve strict liability on the part of the potential offender. Some of these federal and state statutes may directly impact us. Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, an owner of real property, such as us, may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances at, under or disposed of in connection with such property, as well as other potential costs relating to hazardous or toxic substances (including government fines and damages for injuries to persons and adjacent property). The cost of any required remediation, removal, fines or personal or property damages and the owner’s liability therefore could exceed or impair the value of the property and/or the assets of the owner. In addition, the presence of such substances, or the failure to properly dispose of or remediate such substances, may adversely affect the owner’s ability to sell or rent such property or to borrow using such property as collateral which, in turn, could reduce our revenues. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Environmental compliance costs and liabilities associated with real estate properties owned by us may materially impair the value of those investments.”

Compliance Process

As an operator of healthcare facilities, Ensign has a program to help it comply with various requirements of federal and private healthcare programs. In October 2013, Ensign entered into a corporate integrity agreement, or CIA, with the Office of the Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The CIA requires, among other things, that Ensign and its subsidiaries maintain a corporate compliance program to help comply with various requirements of federal and private healthcare programs. After the Spin-Off, we have agreed to certain continuing obligations under Ensign’s compliance program, including certain training in Medicare and Medicaid laws for our employees as required by the CIA.

 

93


Table of Contents

REIT Qualification

We intend to elect to be taxed and intend to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ending December 31, 2014. Our qualification as a REIT will depend upon our ability to meet, on a continuing basis, various complex requirements under the Code relating to, among other things, the sources of our gross income, the composition and values of our assets, our distribution levels to our stockholders and the concentration of ownership of our capital stock. We believe that, commencing with our taxable year ending December 31, 2014, we will be organized in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Code, and that our intended manner of operation will enable us to meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT.

Competition

We will compete for real property investments with other REITs, investment companies, private equity and hedge fund investors, sovereign funds, pension funds, healthcare operators, lenders and other institutional investors. Some of these competitors are significantly larger and have greater financial resources and lower costs of capital than us. Increased competition will make it more challenging to identify and successfully capitalize on acquisition opportunities that meet our investment objectives. Our ability to compete is also impacted by national and local economic trends, availability of investment alternatives, availability and cost of capital, construction and renovation costs, existing laws and regulations, new legislation and population trends.

In addition, revenues from our properties will be dependent on the ability of our tenants and operators to compete with other healthcare operators. These operators compete on a local and regional basis for residents and patients and their ability to successfully attract and retain residents and patients depends on key factors such as the number of facilities in the local market, the types of services available, the quality of care, reputation, age and appearance of each facility and the cost of care in each locality. Private, federal and state payment programs and the effect of other laws and regulations may also have a significant impact on the ability of our tenants and operators to compete successfully for residents and patients at the properties.

Employees

Following the Spin-Off, we expect to employ approximately 42 employees (including our executive officers), none of whom is expected to be subject to a collective bargaining agreement. None of our employees will continue to be employees of Ensign or an affiliate of Ensign. However, immediately following the Spin-Off, we will rely on Ensign to provide certain services to us under the Transition Services Agreement. Within 12 months following the Spin-Off, we plan to hire additional employees in the areas of accounting, finance and asset management, as we intend to reduce our reliance on Ensign for these services under the Transition Services Agreement.

Legal Proceedings

It is expected that, pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, any liability arising from or relating to legal proceedings involving the assets to be owned by us will be assumed by us and that we will indemnify Ensign (and its subsidiaries, directors, officers, employees and agents and certain other related parties) against any losses arising from or relating to such legal proceedings. In addition, pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, Ensign has agreed to indemnify us (including our subsidiaries, directors, officers, employees and agents and certain other related parties) for any liability arising from or relating to legal proceedings involving Ensign’s healthcare business prior to the Spin-Off, and, pursuant to the Master Leases, Ensign or its subsidiaries will agree to indemnify us for any liability arising from operations at the real property leased from us. Ensign is currently a party to various legal actions and administrative proceedings, including various claims arising in the ordinary course of its healthcare business, which will be subject to the indemnities to be provided by Ensign to us. While these actions and proceedings are not believed by Ensign to be material, individually or in the aggregate, the ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be predicted. The resolution of any such legal proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on Ensign’s business, financial position

 

94


Table of Contents

or results of operations, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations if Ensign or its subsidiaries are unable to meet their indemnification obligations.

The Operating Partnership

We intend to own substantially all of our assets and properties and conduct our operations through our Operating Partnership. We believe that conducting business through the Operating Partnership will provide flexibility with respect to the manner in which we structure the acquisition of properties. In particular, an UPREIT structure could enable us to acquire additional properties from sellers in tax deferred transactions. In these transactions, the seller would typically contribute its assets to the Operating Partnership in exchange for units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership (“OP Units”). Holders of OP Units will have the right, after a 12 month holding period, to require the Operating Partnership to redeem any or all of such OP Units for cash based upon the fair market value of an equivalent number of shares of our common stock at the time of the redemption. Alternatively, we may elect to acquire those OP Units in exchange for shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis. The number of shares of common stock used to determine the redemption value of OP Units, and the number of shares issuable in exchange for OP Units, is subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends, distributions of warrants or stock rights, specified extraordinary distributions and similar events. The Operating Partnership is managed by our wholly owned subsidiary, CareTrust GP, LLC, which is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership.

The benefits of our UPREIT structure include the following:

 

    Access to capital. We believe the UPREIT structure will provide us with access to capital for refinancing and growth. Because an UPREIT structure includes a partnership as well as a corporation, we can access the markets through the Operating Partnership issuing equity or debt as well as the corporation issuing capital stock or debt securities. Sources of capital include possible future issuances of debt or equity through public offerings or private placements.

 

    Growth. The UPREIT structure will allow stockholders, through their ownership of common stock, and the limited partners, through their ownership of OP Units, an opportunity to participate in the growth of the real estate market through an ongoing business enterprise. In addition to the initial real property portfolio, we will provide stockholders an interest in all future investments in additional properties.

 

    Tax deferral. The UPREIT structure will provide property owners who transfer their real properties to the Operating Partnership in exchange for OP Units the opportunity to defer the tax consequences that otherwise would arise from a sale of their real properties and other assets to us or to a third party. As a result, this structure will allow us to acquire assets in a more efficient manner and may allow it to acquire assets that the owner would otherwise be unwilling to sell because of tax considerations.

Insurance

We will maintain, or require in our leases, including the Master Leases, that our tenants maintain, all applicable lines of insurance on our properties and their operations. We anticipate that the amount and scope of insurance coverage provided by our policies and the policies maintained by our tenants will be customary for similarly situated companies in our industry. However, we cannot assure you that our tenants will maintain the required insurance coverages, and the failure by any of them to do so could have a material adverse effect on us. We also cannot assure you that we will continue to require the same levels of insurance coverage under our leases, including the Master Leases, that such insurance will be available at a reasonable cost in the future or that the insurance coverage provided will fully cover all losses on our properties upon the occurrence of a catastrophic event, nor can we assure you of the future financial viability of the insurers.

 

95


Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT

Directors

Set forth below is certain biographical information and ages, as of March 31, 2014, for individuals who are expected to serve as our directors following the Spin-Off. Each director will hold office until his or her successor is duly elected or appointed and qualified or until his or her earlier death, retirement, disqualification, resignation or removal.

Our bylaws will provide that our board of directors shall consist of not less than three and not more than nine directors as the board of directors may from time to time determine. Our board of directors will initially consist of five directors, and will be divided into three classes that are, as nearly as possible, of equal size. Each class of directors will be elected for a three-year term of office, but the terms will be staggered so that the term of only one class of directors expires at each annual meeting. The initial terms of the Class I, Class II and Class III directors will expire in 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively. Following the Spin-Off, Christopher R. Christensen will serve as a Class I director, David G. Lindahl and Jon D. Kline will each serve as a Class II director, and Gregory K. Stapley and Gary B. Sabin will each serve as a Class III director. All officers will serve at the discretion of the board of directors.

Upon completion of the Spin-Off, we will have five directors, three of whom we believe will be determined to be independent, as defined under the NASDAQ listing requirements. We believe our board of directors will determine that David G. Lindahl, Gary B. Sabin and Jon D. Kline are independent directors.

Our charter will not provide for cumulative voting in the election of directors, which means that the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock will be able to elect all of the directors standing for election, and the holders of the remaining shares will not be able to elect any directors.

 

Name

   Age     

Position

Gregory K. Stapley

     54       Director, President and Chief Executive Officer

Christopher R. Christensen

     45       Director

David G. Lindahl

     54       Director

Gary B. Sabin

     59       Director

Jon D. Kline

     47       Director

Gregory K. Stapley. Mr. Stapley is the President and Chief Executive Officer of CareTrust. He has served in this position since our inception in 2013. Prior to joining CareTrust, he served as Executive Vice President and Secretary of Ensign, where he was instrumental in assembling the real estate portfolio that will be transferred to CareTrust in the Spin-Off. A co-founder of Ensign, he also served as Ensign’s Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary beginning shortly after Ensign’s founding in 1999. Mr. Stapley previously served as General Counsel for the Sedgwick Companies, an Orange County-based manufacturer, wholesaler and retailer with 192 retail outlets across the United States. Prior to that, Mr. Stapley was a member of the Phoenix law firm of Jennings, Strouss & Salmon PLC, where his practice emphasized real estate and business transactions and government relations. Having served as Executive Vice President of Ensign since 2009 and as Vice President and General Counsel of Ensign from 1999 to 2009, Mr. Stapley brings to our board of directors extensive management experience, critical knowledge of our properties and knowledge and understanding of the healthcare business in general.

Christopher R. Christensen. Mr. Christensen is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Ensign. He has served as Ensign’s President since 1999 and its Chief Executive Officer since 2006. A co-founder of Ensign, Mr. Christensen has overseen Ensign’s growth since Ensign’s founding in 1999. Mr. Christensen has

 

96


Table of Contents

concurrently served as a member of Ensign’s Board of Directors since 1999, and currently sits on the quality assurance and compliance committee of Ensign’s Board of Directors. Mr. Christensen previously served as acting Chief Operating Officer of Covenant Care, Inc., a California-based provider of long-term care. Mr. Christensen will bring to our board of directors significant experience as a chief executive officer and proven ability to manage multiple properties and businesses.

David G. Lindahl. Mr. Lindahl is a partner and Managing Director of HPSI, Inc., a nationwide Group Purchasing Organization with operations serving over 10,000 hospitals, post-acute care providers, educational, hospitality and institutional clients, which collectively purchase over $1 billion of goods and services through HPSI each year. He has been affiliated with HPSI in various capacities since 1981. During a portion of that time, he also served as President of HPSI affiliate The Home Place, an operating pediatric sub-acute facility. We invited Mr. Lindahl to serve on the board based on his executive leadership experience in the healthcare industry, his entrepreneurship and creativity, and his network of relationships with healthcare operators and their trade associations across the United States, particularly the many smaller hospital systems and post-acute providers which will constitute much of our initial target client base.

Gary B. Sabin. Mr. Sabin is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Excel Trust, Inc. (NYSE:EXL), a retail-focused real estate investment trust that primarily targets value-oriented community and power centers, grocery-anchored neighborhood centers and freestanding retail properties. He previously served as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Excel Realty Holdings, as Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Price Legacy Corporation, as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Excel Legacy Corporation, as a Director and President of New Plan Excel Realty Trust and as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Excel Realty Trust. In addition, Mr. Sabin has served as Chief Executive Officer of various companies since his founding of Excel Realty Trust Inc.’s predecessor company and its affiliates beginning in 1978. He has been active for over 30 years in diverse aspects of the real estate industry, including the evaluation and negotiation of real estate acquisitions, management, financing, development and dispositions. Mr. Sabin also currently serves as Chairman of The Sabin Children’s Foundation and Vice Chairman of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Mr. Sabin received a Master’s Degree in Management from Stanford University as a Sloan Fellow, and a Bachelor of Science in Finance from Brigham Young University. We invited Mr. Sabin to serve on the board based on his executive leadership experience in public real estate investment trusts and other real estate companies, his entrepreneurship and creativity, his network of relationships with real estate professionals across the United States and his experience in finance.

Jon D. Kline. Mr. Kline is the Founder and President of Clearview Hotel Capital, LLC, a privately-held hotel investment and advisory company focused on acquiring and asset-managing hotels in urban and unique locations. He previously served as President and Chief Financial Officer of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (NYSE:SHO) which, during his tenure, grew from a private real estate company to a $4.0 billion publicly-traded hotel REIT. Prior to Sunstone, Mr. Kline oversaw the U.S. hospitality and leisure investment banking practice at Merrill Lynch & Co., with responsibility for lodging, gaming, restaurants and other leisure industries. Prior to Merrill Lynch, Mr. Kline was a real estate investment banker at Smith Barney, focused on lodging and other real estate asset classes. Prior to Smith Barney, Mr. Kline was an attorney with Sullivan & Cromwell LLP in New York. Mr. Kline has been a member of the Board of Directors of the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, Orange County Chapter, the United Way, Orange County, Heritage Pointe, and the Urban Land Institute and its Hotel Development Council. Mr. Kline holds a B.A. in Economics from Emory University and a J.D. from New York University School of Law. We invited Mr. Kline to serve on the board based on his executive leadership experience in a publicly-traded REIT, his professional and educational background, his network of relationships with real estate professionals and his extensive background and experience in public markets and in real estate and finance transactions.

Executive Officers

Unless otherwise indicated, the following table shows the names and ages as of March 31, 2014 for executive officers who are not expected to serve as directors and the positions they will hold following the

 

97


Table of Contents

completion of the Spin-Off. A description of the business experience of each for at least the past five years follows the table. Additional executive officers may be selected prior to the Spin-Off and information concerning those executive officers will be included in an amendment to this information statement.

 

Name

   Age     

Position

William M. Wagner

     48       Chief Financial Officer

David M. Sedgwick

     38       Vice President of Operations

William M. Wagner. Mr. Wagner has served as our Chief Financial Officer since December 2013 and also serves as our principal accounting officer. Mr. Wagner served as Chief Financial Officer of First Team Real Estate, a private real estate brokerage company, from 2012 to 2013. From 2008 to 2012, Mr. Wagner served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Nationwide Health Properties, Inc., a healthcare REIT. From 2004 to 2008, Mr. Wagner served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc., a lodging REIT. From 2001 to 2004, Mr. Wagner served as Vice President, Financial Reporting of The TriZetto Group, Inc. From 1999 to 2001, Mr. Wagner worked for two internet start-up ventures. From 1997 to 1999, Mr. Wagner served as Director, Financial Reporting of Irvine Apartment Communities, Inc., a multifamily REIT. From 1990 to 1997, Mr. Wagner worked for EY Kenneth Leventhal Real Estate Group and served real estate clients including several REITs. Mr. Wagner received a B.A. degree in Business Administration from the University of Washington and is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive) in the State of California.

David M. Sedgwick. Mr. Sedgwick is currently employed by The Ensign Group, Inc., and is joining CareTrust as its Vice President of Operations. He is a licensed nursing home administrator and has served in several key leadership roles at Ensign since 2001. During 2013, he operated Ensign’s newly-built Medicare-only skilled nursing facility in Denver, Colorado, and simultaneously supported all of Ensign’s skilled nursing operations in Colorado. During 2012, he served as President of Ensign’s Maryland-based urgent care franchise venture, Doctors Express. From 2007 to 2012, Mr. Sedgwick served as Ensign’s Chief Human Capital Officer, with responsibility for recruiting and training more than 100 newly licensed nursing home administrators and directing Ensign University, which included Ensign’s administrator training program. From 2002 to 2007, he operated three Ensign skilled nursing facilities in two states. Mr. Sedgwick holds a B.S. in Accounting from Brigham Young University and an M.B.A. from the University of Southern California. Mr. Sedgwick is Mr. Stapley’s brother-in-law.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Prior to the Spin-Off, our board of directors will establish the following committees, each of which will operate under a written charter that will be posted to our website at www.CareTrustREIT.com prior to the Spin-Off:

Audit Committee

The audit committee will be established in accordance with Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act and the NASDAQ listing requirements. The primary duties of the audit committee will be to, among other things:

 

    determine the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of our independent registered public accounting firm;

 

    review and approve in advance all permitted non-audit engagements and relationships between us and our independent registered public accounting firm;

 

    evaluate our independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, independence and performance;

 

    review and discuss with our independent registered public accounting firm their audit plan, including the timing and scope of audit activities;

 

98


Table of Contents
    review our combined financial statements;

 

    review our critical accounting policies and practices;

 

    review the adequacy and effectiveness of our accounting and internal control policies and procedures;

 

    review with our management all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design and operation of our internal controls;

 

    review with our management any fraud that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in our internal controls;

 

    establish procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding internal accounting controls or auditing matters and the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters;

 

    review on an ongoing basis and approve or disapprove related party transactions;

 

    prepare the reports required by the rules of the SEC to be included in our annual proxy statement, if we are subject to the proxy rules under the Exchange Act; and

 

    discuss with our management and our independent registered public accounting firm the results of our annual audit and the review of our quarterly combined financial statements.

The audit committee will provide an avenue of communication among management, the independent registered public accounting firm, the corporate auditors and the board of directors.

The audit committee will be comprised of members that meet the independence requirements set forth by the SEC, in the NASDAQ listing requirements and the audit committee charter. Each member of the audit committee will be financially literate in accordance with the NASDAQ listing requirements. The audit committee will also have at least one member who meets the definition of an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC rules and regulations. Upon completion of the Spin-Off, the initial members of the audit committee are expected to be David G. Lindahl, Gary B. Sabin and Jon D. Kline.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The primary responsibilities of the nominating and corporate governance committee will be to, among other things:

 

    assist in identifying, recruiting and evaluating individuals qualified to become members of our board of directors, consistent with criteria approved by our board of directors and the nomination and corporate governance committee;

 

    recommend to our board of directors individuals qualified to serve as directors and on committees of our board of directors;

 

    advise our board of directors with respect to board composition, procedures and committees;

 

    recommend to our board of directors certain corporate governance matters and practices; and

 

    conduct an annual self-evaluation for our board of directors.

The nominating and corporate governance committee will be comprised of members that meet the independence requirements set forth by the SEC and in the NASDAQ listing requirements and the nominating and corporate governance committee charter. Upon completion of the Spin-Off, the initial members of the nominating and corporate governance committee are expected to be David G. Lindahl, Gary B. Sabin and Jon D. Kline.

 

99


Table of Contents

Compensation Committee

The primary responsibilities of the compensation committee will be to, among other things:

 

    review executive compensation plans and their goals and objectives, and make recommendations to our board of directors, as appropriate;

 

    evaluate the performance of our executive officers;

 

    review and approve the compensation of our executive officers and directors, including salary and bonus awards;

 

    establish overall employee compensation policies and recommend to our board of directors major compensation programs;

 

    administer our various employee benefit, pension and equity incentive programs;

 

    review and discuss with management our compensation discussion and analysis (the “CD&A”) and recommend to our board of directors that the CD&A be included in the annual proxy statement or annual report; and

 

    prepare an annual report on executive compensation for inclusion in our proxy statement.

The compensation committee will be comprised of members that meet the independence requirements set forth by the SEC and in the NASDAQ listing requirements and the compensation committee charter. The members of the compensation committee will be “non-employee directors” (within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act) and “outside directors” (within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code). Upon completion of the Spin-Off, the initial members of the compensation committee are expected to be David G. Lindahl, Gary B. Sabin and Jon D. Kline.

Other Committees

Our board of directors may establish other committees as it deems necessary or appropriate from time to time.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of our directors will have interlocking or other relationships with other boards of directors, compensation committees or our executive officers that would require disclosure under Item 407(e)(4) of Regulation S-K.

Compensation of Directors

We are currently reviewing the compensation that we will pay to our non-employee directors following the Spin-Off, but we anticipate that non-employee directors will be compensated for their service under a non-employee director fee plan, which has not yet been established, and the CareTrust REIT, Inc. and CTR Partnership, L.P. Incentive Award Plan, which we expect to adopt prior to the Spin-Off. We will provide information regarding director compensation and the decision-making process for determining director compensation in our future filings with the SEC.

Executive Officer Compensation

Executive Compensation

The following table provides certain summary information concerning the compensation paid by Ensign for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 to our principal executive officer, Mr. Stapley, and Mr. Wagner and Mr. Sedgwick, whom we expect will be our two other most highly compensated executive officers following the Spin-Off (collectively, the “named executive officers”). The amounts and forms of compensation reported below are not necessarily indicative of the compensation that our executive officers will receive following the Spin-Off.

 

100


Table of Contents

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE